Ambala to station first squadron of MMRCA fighters

[notorious_eagle]

What about this then?

Watch more closely, thats a test round. Look at the blue stripes on the missile, that means its a test round and not a real one.

@Mafiya

Why are you even bothering with these fanboys? Its no point, no matter what proof you post they will not accept it. To put it politely, they have a massive Indian bias and cannot be impartial when it comes to Pakistan. They are too dumb to even comprehend that the entire purpose behind the JF17 was to have a cost effective BVR fighters which could be data-linked to PAF's network centric system.

I don't rely on source-less articles.

Well than you will not find any articles because PAF does not call up journalists and release their specs.

Just give me some credible proof right here that PAF JF-17s are operational withSD-10 missile, some reliable proof with reliable visual evidence would be fine.

The pictures are right there, your too biased to accept it the pictures or even logic.

 

[Bratva]

PAF released missile in 2012 and got pics in 2009? PAF has got time machine out there??

The infopool thread is too long and too adjective, a question in page 7 is replied
on page 19 how much time will I spend on going through that thread??

I don't rely on source-less articles.

Just give me some credible proof right here that PAF JF-17s are operational with
SD-10 missile, some reliable proof with reliable visual evidence would be fine.

Sorry I meant early prototypes of FC-1 and the Super-7 which did not have DSI.

PAF GOT F-16 BLOCK 52 and delivery of AIM-120 C5 and JDAMS and Sniper Pods in 2009 but chose to release these photos attached with F-16 after 3 years.

No we are not in business to give you credible visual proof because PAF has not released photos of SD-10 A attached with JF-17. Why? It's PAF habit. Not Good in marketing something.

Until than we and sensible and neutral sources believe what JF-17 Director and a Other high ranking official said and that's why their comments were published in those articles.

That's what pakistani members are trying to put in your thick head which you are not getting!

P.S. You have been arguing for 30-45 minutes. In this time frame you could have easily go through 10 pages of info Pool thread. because your objective is to find those articles not to read it post by post.

 

[peep]

PAF GOT F-16 BLOCK 52 and delivery of AIM-120 C5 and JDAMS and Sniper Pods in 2009 but chose to release these photos attached with F-16 after 3 years.

No we are not in business to give you credible visual proof because PAF has not released photos of SD-10 A attached with JF-17. Why? It's PAF habit. Not Good in marketing something.

Until than we and sensible and neutral sources believe what JF-17 Director and a Other high ranking official said and that's why their comments were published in those articles.

That's what pakistani members are trying to put in your thick head which you are not getting!

all he is asking is, if you guys have a timestamped photo or something of 2009 which was released in 2012 ? if not how come we believe you ?

Eg. chinese ACC is a joke right now with no credible photos showing j15 landing on it.. after 2 years if they release a photo doesnt mean all the fanboy's photoshopped photos of present are real !!

 

[SamantK]

Why are you even bothering with these fanboys? Its no point, no matter what proof you post they will not accept it. To put it politely, they have a massive Indian bias and cannot be impartial when it comes to Pakistan. They are too dumb to even comprehend that the entire purpose behind the JF17 was to have a cost effective BVR fighters which could be data-linked to PAF's network centric system.

The proof is a generals word you, mafiya and secur have put forth.. Now if he is in a habit of believing only after seeing how is it a bias?

Actually if you get something in 2009 it is better to show it to the wold, it does earn you some brownie points(euphemism) or have you lost on that concept?

Well than you will not find any articles because PAF does not call up journalists and release their specs.

In 2012 they did.

 

[Bratva]

all he is asking is, if you guys have a timestamped photo or something of 2009 which was released in 2012 ? if not how come we believe you ?

Eg. chinese ACC is a joke right now with no credible photos showing j15 landing on it.. after 2 years if they release a photo doesnt mean all the fanboy's photoshopped photos of present are real !!

Does IAF photos come with time stamped? How more stupid you can become?

 

[Bratva]

The proof is a generals word you, mafiya and secur have put forth.. Now if he is in a habit of believing only after seeing how is it a bias?

Actually if you get something in 2009 it is better to show it to the wold, it does earn you some brownie points(euphemism) or have you lost on that concept?





In 2012 they did.

Our Generals work that way and if Gesseler got that habit. Than he should wait.

 

[peep]

Does IAF photos come with time stamped? How more stupid you can become?

nope but we do announce it .. whatever we have, the entire world knows. In today's world every weapon's deterrent value should be taken full advantage of..

In this age where chances of all out war is almost zero, saving something for a surprise in war is foolish.

And, I meant "timestamped or something" ie. I am open to accept any proof of the photo being taken in 2009..

 

[SamantK]

Our Generals work that way and if Gesseler got that habit. Than he should wait.

Maybe he will but you guys are hell bent on him to take yours and your general's word for it.

However, generals can lie for whatever reasons esp Pakistan's so his advice and insistence on demanding visual proof is still valid.. for good or bad..

embolden part part added later..

 

[Windjammer]

2 Indian Su-30 MkI ingressed in the Lahore sector, Pakistan's second most important city after Karachi. 3 Indian Mirage 2000H ingressed in the Kashmir sector. The Su-30 Mki "FLANKER" were intercepted by 3 F-16s and 3 F-7 combat aircraft from the Pakistan Air Force, while the Mirage 2000Hs were intercepted by 2 F-16s and 2 Mirage IIIs. The intercepts were made within 4 miles of entering Pakistani territory, and the intruders were escorted out of Pakistani airspace. According to the PAF, the Indian aircraft were fully armed.

Don't mean to spoil the fan boy party but i'm sure you have either heard or read about the above incident.....just like to add that the F-7s involved were the "PG" version which Pakistan acquired in the middle of 2002 hostilities with India and the Mirages were of "ROSE-III" standards.......
The reason i pointed this out is that these weapon systems were sent to confront IAF aircraft....not exactly for WVR combat. !!!

 

[Bratva]

nope but we do announce it .. whatever we have, the entire world knows. In today's world every weapon's deterrent value should be taken full advantage of..

In this age where chances of all out war is almost zero, saving something for a surprise in war is foolish.

And, I meant "timestamped or something" ie. I am open to accept any proof of the photo being taken in 2009..

Maybe he will but you guys are hell bent on him to take yours and your general's word for it.

However, generals can lie for whatever reasons esp Pakistan's so his advice and insistence on demanding visual proof is still valid.. for good or bad..

embolden part part added later..

Remember our our babur cruise missiles came out of no where?. No matter how much you cry for visual proof. Either Our military don't make tall claims, but once they claim something than it does not meant lie.

i bet you don't even know what is H-2 and H-4 and their associated history and how something developed in 2002 were shown it's visual proof in 2010. So point being, Out Gernals don't make hoo haa on every thing they have.

 

[SamantK]

Remember our our babur cruise missiles came out of no where?. No matter how much you cry for visual proof. Either Our military don't make tall claims, but once they claim something than it does not meant lie.

i bet you don't even know what is H-2 and H-4 and their associated history and how something developed in 2002 were shown it's visual proof in 2010. So point being, Out Gernals don't make hoo haa on every thing they have.

Ok, if you say so but please read some about your generals in the past..

 

[chauvunist]

Actually Gessler and his fanboy friends are frustrated over the failure of their LCA tejas whom they are dreaming to see in air for the previous 2 or 3 decades but that ugly fatboy has sworn to disappoint them time and again.....Come guys dont be so jealous our smart boy ...

 

[peep]

Actually Gessler and his fanboy friends are frustrated over the failure of their LCA tejas whom they are dreaming to see in air for the previous 2 or 3 decades but that ugly fatboy has sworn to disappoint them time and again.....Come guys dont be so jealous our smart boy ...

go run to your momma kid ! big boys are talking

ontopic: yeah even we had agni-v way back from 1975 immediately after the pokhran tests.. we choose to reveal it now

 

[Tshering22]

Actually Gessler and his fanboy friends are frustrated over the failure of their LCA tejas whom they are dreaming to see in air for the previous 2 or 3 decades but that ugly fatboy has sworn to disappoint them time and again.....Come guys dont be so jealous our smart boy ...

This is not a versus thread. DOn't make it into one.

First, it is about an aircraft that is in a different league.

Second, let's not bring apples to oranges.

 

[Bratva]

Ok, if you say so but please read some about your generals in the past..

Please enlighten us if our Generals claimed a defense capability and later it was turned out to be fake? and other than that is totally offtopic and is no way is related to topic.