Developereo
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
- Messages
- 14,093
- Reaction score
- 25
- Country
- Location
I have explained this is extreme detail
You keep digging a hole for yourself. Catholics are a subset of Christians.
For you to claim they are not Christians is not a mater of personal opinion. it is bigotry plain and simple.
Provide evidence for you discriminating against Christianity? Are you being sarcastic? Almost every single one of your posts in this thread are supporting discrimination against Christians. And it's not only me with this viewpoint many other people here agree that this is discrimination.
More desperate ramblings from you.
I am against fraudulent practices by anyone. In this case, it happens to be Christian missionaries. There are others, including Christian scholars familiar with the tactics of missionaries, who agree with me.
It is only people like you who refuse to accept that Christian missionaries are engaging in misconduct. You keep finding excuses for their misconduct, you keep rejecting the reports by other because they are "Catholic", you keep living in denial that their actions precipitated this ruling.
You have argued yourself into a corner by your denials, and now you keep digging a hole for yourself by spouting bigotry against Catholics to salvage your state of denial.
I can make the same argument for Jesus, the Christian concept of Jesus is different from the Muslim concept of Jesus. Yet this does not stop Muslims from talking about Jesus to Christians, it does not stop Muslims from calling Isa Jesus.
And I showed you why your clueless argument is invalid. Jesus as an individual is legitimate in both Islam and Christianity.
It is only if Muslim missionaries claimed allegiance to the Trinity, or claiming Jesus to be the Son of God, that their tactics would become fraudulent.
I am enjoying your desperate flailing, going back and forth and back-peddling, when your illogical point doesn't stand.
ts for your personal preferences when it comes to Christians using 'allah', how ironic. I stated i have no problem with Muslims talking about the trinity when talking to Christians after you mentioned the trinity and how it would be deceitful for Muslims to speak about it when talking to Christians. I'm not insecure for this to bother me.
It is not about my personal preference and nobody gives a damn about your securities.
It is the opinion of theologians and people who are familiar with the history of misconduct by Christian missionaries that the missionaries are using deceptive means.
Words matter because words have meanings.
YOU may be fine with people misusing words to deceive people, but it doesn't mean the world has to be as careless as you are.
i made one spelling mistake
You did NOT make a spelling mistake. You made a deliberately false claim about Dr. Reynolds, saying that critics of missionaries agreed with your position. They do not. Only apologists for missionaries agree with you.