ALL Xinjiang related issues e.g. uyghur people, development, videos etc, In here please.

[bsruzm]

Lol. That's an interesting one actually. . However,even though China has Muslims it will be ironic if they were to lead them due to that then it will be a paradox, since by that measure countries like India can even less them as well given its size and vast population of Muslims (over 200million) . An officially an atheist government/country a Hindu led country leading Muslim world. Now that will be interesting

Not funny, that's something UK tried but failed miserably.

 

[UKBengali]

See the double sided face of this hyprocrite. The money earn from bangladesh can help us build more sophsiticated equipment or better armed police to deal with local violence and control. Right?

Look BD actually wants China to do well economically and militarily as then it is good for China, BD and most of the world in general.
We just do not understand why you do not understand that trying to destroy someone's culture is wrong?

 

[OIO]

Look BD actually wants China to do well economically and militarily as then it is good for China, BD and most of the world in general.
We just do not understand why you do not understand that trying to destroy someone's culture is wrong?

Arabization is destroying Uighurs' culture.

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

Lol. That's an interesting one actually. . However,even though China has Muslims it will be ironic if they were to lead them due to that then it will be a paradox, since by that measure countries like India can also lead them as well given its size and vast population of Muslims (over 200million Muslims, more than the population of any Muslim country except Indonesia) . An officially an atheist government/country and a Hindu led country leading Muslim world. Now that will be interesting

The more I think about it, the more I go "why not?"

 

[Beast]

Look BD actually wants China to do well economically and militarily as then it is good for China, BD and most of the world in general.
We just do not understand why you do not understand that trying to destroy someone's culture is wrong?

We never try destroy one culture. The one really want to destroy uyghur culture are wahabbism and salafism..

China ban these 2 sect who encourage abandon uyghur customes, folks singing and traditional. It ask woman to dress Burqa instead of traditional Uighur dress. China for once never outlaw uighur langauges since the creation of PRC 1949 while its Turkey who only legalize Kurdish languages and Indonesia too legalize Chinese language in year 2000 only. Feel free to checkout my facts of what I mention.

There are exceptions to laws and regulations that ban the use of Mandarin. The use of Mandarin in traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions, for example, is not prohibited, since legal proceedings related to this case have been suspended after lobbying made to the Attorney General (Jaksa Agung) of Indonesia by INI (Ikatan Naturopatis Indonesia).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legislation_on_Chinese_Indonesians

The use of Kurdish language, dress, folklore, and names were banned and the Kurdish-inhabited areas remained under martial law until 1946.[7] In an attempt to deny their existence, the Turkish government categorized Kurds as "Mountain Turks" until the 1980s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_of_Kurdish_people_in_Turkey

While Uighur language CCTV channel long existence ever since Xinjiang TV created in the late 70s. You can feel free to google those channel upload in youtube.

 

[UKBengali]

Arabization is destroying Uighurs' culture.

We agree that Arab influence is not good but why do you not come and ask Muslim countries like BD how to deal with Wahabi culture?

 

[OIO]

We agree that Arab influence is not good but why do you not come and ask Muslim countries like BD how to deal with Wahabi culture?

You don't succeed, and China is different, why should China follow you step?

 

[Spy Master]

Well done Indonesia. Should have been Pakistan asking this question.

 

[UKBengali]

You don't succeed, and China is different, why should China follow you step?

Yes BD succeeded.
BD is still largely free of Wahabi influence.

This Rohingya and Uighur issue is not helping China to make friends.

 

[Beast]

Yes BD succeeded.
BD is still largely free of Wahabi influence.

This Rohingya and Uighur issue is not helping China to make friends.

Thing is not always just black and white. Uighur is never an issue but more of misinfo by west and you foolishly believe it.

Rohingya issue cannot be solved in a single day. No countries even the US are willing to send troops to force repatriation against Myanmar. By provoking Myanmar, what good will it do to Rohingya even they are expatriate back? China believe in dialogue to coax them slowly take back their citizen with dignity. Its lengthy but is the best solution. Economic sanction will applies if all dialogues failed and let them realise its themselves to reach that stage.

 

[Indos]

Ok so who should.be the leader then? Do you think if say Turkey is the leader other countries like say Iran will agree to follow their lead? If Indonesia was to be the leader you think others like Malaysia, Turkey, etc will agree to follow behind them as juniors ? Etc etc. I don't think it's feasible to be honest. Moreover the gap between these countries (technologically, economically, scientifically , militarily etc ) isn't that big. So there's no way any country will agree to be a junior or follow the leadership of the other.

I dont think there should be any leader for this group in order to be able to make any joint action whether in diplomatic front, economic front, or possibly military front. Common aspiration can be the best glue for making such cooperation, particularly among members with strong economy and military. We have OIC for the start, and I think this organization can be utilize for bigger and significant objective like imposing economic embargo to any particular country who persecute Muslim. We have actually done that with Israel.

If for instance Western European countries can make union like EU so why Muslim nations cannot make similar union? If we look on the past, those countries were fighting each other for hundreds of years before but they now can make such union. We also see effective union like African Union who even have their joint military force and has made military intervention in Somalia.

 

[UKBengali]

Thing is not always just black and white. Uighur is never an issue but more of misinfo by west and you foolishly believe it.

Rohingya issue cannot be solved in a single day. No countries even the US are willing to send troops to force repatriation against Myanmar. By provoking Myanmar, what good will it do to Rohingya even they are expatriate back? China believe in dialogue to coax them slowly take back their citizen with dignity. Its lengthy but is the best solution. Economic sanction will applies if all dialogues failed and let them realise its themselves to reach that stage.

Ok, let us agree to disagree as both BD and China have good economic and military relations.

 

[OIO]

Yes BD succeeded.
BD is still largely free of Wahabi influence.

This Rohingya and Uighur issue is not helping China to make friends.

Glad to see you succeed, China also succeed, people dont need to go through the same way to succeed.

 

[UKBengali]

Glad to see you succeed, China also succeed, people dont need to go through the same way to succeed.

Which other country in modern history needs to erase a culture to fight terrorism?
No one disputes that Xinjiang is legally Chinese territory, it is your methods are far far too extreme to deal with your problems in that territory.

 

[mike2000 is back]

I dont think there should be any leader for this group in order to be able to make any joint action whether in diplomatic front, economic front, or possibly military front. Common aspiration can be the best glue for making such cooperation, particularly among members with strong economy and military. We have OIC for the start, and I think this organization can be utilize for bigger and significant objective like imposing economic embargo to any particular country who persecute Muslim. We have actually done that with Israel.

If for instance Western European countries can make union like EU so why Muslim nations cannot make similar union? If we look on the past, those countries were fighting each other for hundreds of years before but they now can make such union. We also see effective union like African Union who even have their joint military force and has made military intervention in Somalia.

Yes a union sound more feasible. However, there also needs to be some sort of understanding and common interest in play here before such a grouping can succeed. Also the Muslim world is too vast and diverse unlike Europe is on the same geographical region/continent and shares similar links/history/culture to some extent and after the first and second world world's they had to come to an understanding given the world's changing landscape and their shared interests in forming a grouping/union to counter balance the emergence of the mighty Soviet Union which posed a big security/existential threat to European countries back then , hence it made forming a union to counter this shared threat easier.
However it's different for muslim countries since they are spread over the world , from Balkans in eastern far side of Europe to Mediterranean to Africa to Middle east to South East Asia to South Asia etc. They are to diverse and complicated. Moreover they don't share the same history, culture/tradition is world's apart, interests and threats are totally different , realities they are facing are completely different from each other etc. So this makes a Islamic union similar to E.U almost impossible to work like E.U. So it will always be limited in what they can achieve.