Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The essential problem we have here is, we have many newbie members who loves to talk without any sources. Everyone writes in this forum whatever he likes and all the info gots jumbled.Here the informations are mixed up badly. Can some one who has knowledge about Anka, enlighten us?
Really why Anka's flight time and altitude are decreased dramatically?
The essential problem we have here is, we have many newbie members who loves to talk without any sources. Everyone writes in this forum whatever he likes and all the info gots jumbled.
Just ignore the newbie guys and those guys whom talk without a source, except Combat-Master and Cabatlı.... recently, i'm not even reading the posts, just reading CM's and Cabatlı's posts.
Where do you guys get these numbers from? 18 hours? 19k ft? that's ridiculous. This is the first time I have seen "19000 ft" and "Anka" in the same sentence. Just a couple weeks back Anka-B flew at 30.393 ft for 26 hr 20 min with full payload. What makes you think Anka-S will be that different?
The essential problem we have here is, we have many newbie members who loves to talk without any sources. Everyone writes in this forum whatever he likes and all the info gots jumbled.
Just ignore the newbie guys and those guys whom talk without a source, except Combat-Master and Cabatlı.... recently, i'm not even reading the posts, just reading CM's and Cabatlı's posts.
because of SATCOM payload
because of SATCOM payload
Since the test flight was done with full payload it should not be too much different from the actual flight (200kg according to some, 240 according to others. This means even if some components were not available a dummy weight was placed to account for their weight.). If anything the actual operational flight should be better than this.haha start by ignoring yourself. you are waste of database here.
Bro, don't you understand that 30k feet was a test flight, not operational flight as ziya said."because of satcam payload"
Since the test flight was done with full payload it should not be too much different from the actual flight (200kg according to some, 240 according to others. This means even if some components were not available a dummy weight was placed to account for their weight.). If anything the actual operational flight should be better than this.
Plus there is not too much of a difference in terms of payload between Anka-B and Anka-S in my opinion. Anka-S has a SATCOM antenna, but it lacks a SA Radar. And Anka-B has a SA Radar but it lacks a SATCOM antenna.
-------------------------------------
Anka-S
Anka-B