Kharian_Beast
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 1,645
- Reaction score
- 0
The circus is in Mumbai, get your tickets here folks!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The circus is in Mumbai, get your tickets here folks!
I changed the title of the thread to reflect Kasab's confession.Hey mods why did u change the title of the thread? Didn't you read the following in the post?
"a serving member of the Pakistani Army, Colonel Saadat Ullah, who is alleged to have helped to set up the internet telephony system through which the gunmen received instruction from their Pakistan-based handlers."
I changed the title of the thread to reflect Kasab's confession.
Are you suggesting the title is not what Kasab alleged? Please indicate how it is inaccurate.
Are you comparing a rape incident with the Mumbai attacks. If you are then pls confirm then we can further continue the discussion.Now you'll tell me that because an Indian Army officer rapes a woman in kashmir, that's an institutional policy followed by the IA?
The only surviving suspected gunman in the Mumbai terror attacks has retracted his confession after claiming it was extracted by torture, his defence lawyer says.
Mumbai Terror Attacks: Mohammed Ajmal Kasab Retracts Confession And Alleges Torture | World News | Sky News
I would rather ask you what was wrong with the title that I had kept? It read "Kasab's confession suggests Pak Army involvement in 26/11 Mumbai attacks."
Are you comparing a rape incident with the Mumbai attacks. If you are then pls confirm then we can further continue the discussion.
I suggest having a Single and preferably sticky thread for KASAB TRIAL to avoid any similar confusion. If we want to have discussions a single thread will be more successful. All the various KASAB TRIAL threads should be mreged nd made sticky - A request to MODS.
Your title suggested that the Pakistan Army as an institution was involved, whereas kasab's confession alleges someone claiming to be a Colonel met him (gave him his name and rank and how he was going to be assisting in a terrorist attack). There is a distinct difference between the two.
I am not suggesting that a rape or terrorist attack are the same crime, what I am pointing out if you argue that one crime allegedly committed by a serving Army officer can be used to justify institutional involvement (this alleged colonel setting up internet telephony), then so can another (Army personnel raping women) - its a fallacious argument.