Why are you posting an article published in 2005? How is it relevant to anything? This article is outdated and inaccurate.
I just read first couple of lines when I came across this - "India has the world's largest AID infested population."
Fact#1 -
India does not have the world's largest AIDS population. It has the world's third largest behind South Africa and Nigeria.
India HIV caseload seen dramatically lower | Reuters - UN USAID revised figure
Fact#2 -
India's AIDS population is in the range of 2.5 million (not 5+ million).
This has been mentioned in the source above and also, most AIDS cases in India are restricted to certain pockets in south and NE India.
Fact#3 -
India's AIDS prevalence rate is 0.30%, not 1%
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2155rank.html
Compare this with AIDS prevalence rates in developed countries -
USA - 0.6
Spain - 0.5
Portugal - 0.5
Canada - 0.4
Italy - 0.4
France - 0.4
Therefore, the AIDS prevalence rate in India is lower than that of several developed nations. As a matter of fact, the global figure is 0.80% and India's figure is 0.30%.
Yet, some people here keep presenting outdated information to taunt India. Lame really.