What's new

Ahmedis in a Chakwal village fear for their lives

They are not Muslims no other sect say that HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW is not the last PROPHET or a PROPHET came after HAZRAT MUHAMMAD SAW they are not Muslims but still as non Muslims they should be fully protected by state.
You accept Isis and Taliban as Muslim but Ahmad is as not. Then there is something wrong with your interpretation.
 
Why is it so difficult to comprehend ?

Easy buddy, was kidding. Temples can't have minarets I know.

Edit: And regarding law, well you can say its an identification crisis. A non Qadiyani may be misguided by minarets to enter that worship place as mosque, both of them won't like to pray in each other's worship places.
 
Last edited:
Or are you saying that Allah cannot give anymore knowledge to humans.
What about Sai baba in India who is thought to be a messenger from God revered by all religions. Tell, tell

I have seen your posts before dothead, not worth my time **** off. :)
 
And a takfiri wahhabi would say you are both non-muslim infidels who should be executed immediately :D

Well life and death is the decision and in hands of ALL MIGHTY only, who cares what a sunni, shia, ahmedi, deobandi, bralevi, wahabi says.

LOL. Tell that to your blood thirsty clerics :D

My blood thirsty clerics :undecided:

If it was up to me I would have all non compromising extremist clerics and secular executed by a firing squad. And for you I would have punished you similarly like if you have watched that bollywood movie "Mard" where the hero's (Amitabh's) hands and legs are tied to four horses and stretched in opposite direction. After that I would hang you up side down, then water board you, sleep deprive you, confine you in a cell 3' x 3' without day light. :police:
 
I have seen your posts before dothead, not worth my time **** off. :)
Chill mister. I know how you are.

Well life and death is the decision and in hands of ALL MIGHTY only, who cares what a sunni, shia, ahmedi, deobandi, bralevi, wahabi says.



My blood thirsty clerics :undecided:

If it was up to me I would have all non compromising extremist clerics and secular executed by a firing squad. And for you I would have punished you similarly like if you have watched that bollywood movie "Mard" where the hero's (Amitabh's) hands and legs are tied to four horses and stretched in opposite direction. After that I would hang you up side down, then water board you, sleep deprive you, confine you in a cell 3' x 3' without day light. :police:
But mard ko dard nahin hota
 
Or are you saying that Allah cannot give anymore knowledge to humans.
What about Sai baba in India who is thought to be a messenger from God revered by all religions. Tell, tell


Point to ponder indeed...the knowledge imparting stops in the 7th century.
 
That is what Qadyanis say. anyway this is known to all how ahmediya/qadyani movement started in India.

Indians are keen to take Pakistani non-Muslims and give them Indian citizenship . One wonders why India does not start an annual pilgrim for qadyanis in India. As qadyan is in India where the qadyaniyat was born

You are mistaken, they are keen to offer citizenship to Pakistani Hindus only. Deep down they have Ahmedis on their hate list (ranking is probably 4th or 5th).
 
You are mistaken, they are keen to offer citizenship to Pakistani Hindus only. Deep down they have Ahmedis on their hate list (ranking is probably 4th or 5th).
Indians don't hate Islam,we just don't agree. It is not more than 0 instance when Hindu have knocked down a functioning mosque and not more than 1 instance when a non functioning defunct mosque was torn down.
Muslims live happily here and 90% of then will not want to move to Pakistan if offered.
On Ahmad is, since they are Muslims we don't offer them citizenship.
 
Pakistanis are hypocrates. Why Ismaelis are not persecuted on goverment level? There is huge differences between Ismaili Islam and sunni islam. Is that because Agha Khan is rich? Or the fact that Jinnah was also Ismaili.

Ismailis own their identity.
 
Pakistanis are hypocrates. Why Ismaelis are not persecuted on goverment level? There is huge differences between Ismaili Islam and sunni islam. Is that because Agha Khan is rich? Or the fact that Jinnah was also Ismaili.

Both the Aga Khan and the Ahmadi "Caliph" are rich, both live off of chanda from their followers. The only difference is the Aga Khan is richer because his family has been at it for over a thousand years and has invested the chanda in profitable ventures. So no richness is not a factor.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom