Abe Denies Japan Invaded Asian Neighbors in WWWII

[Fsjal]

I wonder what happens if the shrine was destroyed by some North Korean or Chinese spy.

Japanese people would flip like crazy

 

[kawaraj]

Even Japanese are frowning at what Abe said, he's consuming a lethal pill.

I'd like to see DPJ is peeking the light of regaining power.

 

[GR!FF!N]

Don't know why everybody worries so much about that shrine..It was built to record every man/woman who died for Japan during war..so,even war criminals(as per condemned by Allied Forces) were fought and died for Imperial Japan..Those were not criminals in Japan,they were Heroes and Martyrs,just like Japan sees USA as a murderer for dropping nukes in Japan and killing millions of civilians..thats the difference of perception..


and every country has similar memorial for their dead soldiers.In India,we've India gate,USA,UK,France has several just for WW II.every country honor their soldiers..Even Germany has their share of memorials made during Nazi Period..

I wonder what happens if the shrine was destroyed by some North Korean or Chinese spy.

Japanese people would flip like crazy

A chinese man, Liu Qiang tried to burn that shrine's gate for some personal and family revenge(he attacked Japan embassy in seoul too)..he was extradited to china..

 

[northeast]

Don't know why everybody worries so much about that shrine..It was built to record every man/woman who died for Japan during war..so,even war criminals(as per condemned by Allied Forces) were fought and died for Imperial Japan..Those were not criminals in Japan,they were Heroes and Martyrs,just like Japan sees USA as a murderer for dropping nukes in Japan and killing millions of civilians..thats the difference of perception..


and every country has similar memorial for their dead soldiers.In India,we've India gate,USA,UK,France has several just for WW II.every country honor their soldiers..Even Germany has their share of memorials made during Nazi Period..




A chinese man, Liu Qiang tried to burn that shrine's gate for some personal and family revenge(he attacked Japan embassy in seoul too)..he was extradited to china..

So，you say it's ok if merkel build a tomb for hitler and himmler and hold ceremony every year？
How would jews and polish think about that？I am sure some jews would destroy that tomb.stupid ，heartless and brainless indians.

 

[zxmint]

Don't know why everybody worries so much about that shrine..It was built to record every man/woman who died for Japan during war..so,even war criminals(as per condemned by Allied Forces) were fought and died for Imperial Japan..Those were not criminals in Japan,they were Heroes and Martyrs,just like Japan sees USA as a murderer for dropping nukes in Japan and killing millions of civilians..thats the difference of perception..


and every country has similar memorial for their dead soldiers.In India,we've India gate,USA,UK,France has several just for WW II.every country honor their soldiers..Even Germany has their share of memorials made during Nazi Period..




A chinese man, Liu Qiang tried to burn that shrine's gate for some personal and family revenge(he attacked Japan embassy in seoul too)..he was extradited to china..

Since Japanese Hitlers are in that shrine. Maybe Merkel should also visit Hitler's tomb, if there is one, and claim it is Germany's own issue and other countries should not overreact.

 

[GR!FF!N]

So，you say it's ok if merkel build a tomb for hitler and himmler and hold ceremony every year？
How would jews and polish think about that？I am sure some jews would destroy that tomb.stupid ，heartless and brainless indians.

Noob chinese,thats what germany did..they don't make ceremony about Hitler and Himler though,but hundreds of war memorials are still exists in Germany..and for the word criminal,I think you should read what Justice Radha Vinod Pal(Indian member of International Military Tribunal for the Far East) said about it...

"I might mention in this connection that even the published accounts of Nanking 'rape' could not be accepted by the world without some suspicion of exaggeration... Referring to the same incident, Sir Charles Addis on that occasion could say: 'Between two countries at war there was always a danger that one or other of the combatants would seek to turn public opinion in his favour by resort to a propaganda in which incidents, inseparable alas from all hostilities, were magnified and distorted for the express purpose of inflaming prejudice and passion and obscuring the real issues of the conflict.'"

and also this...

"I would hold that every one of the accused must be found not guilty of every one of the charges in the indictment and should be acquitted on all those charges." (about Japanese war criminals)..because he thought its the spirit of retribution, and not impartial justice, was the underlying criterion for passing the judgment against generals..

Pal believed that the Tokyo Trial was incapable of passing a just sentence. He considered the trial to be unjust and unreasonable, contributing nothing to lasting peace. According to his view, the trial was the judgment of the vanquished by the victors; such proceedings, even if clothed in the garb of law, resulted in nothing but the satisfaction of the desire for vengeance. In his lone dissent, he refers to the trial as a "sham employment of legal process for the satisfaction of a thirst for revenge." According to Norimitsu Onishi, while he fully acknowledged Japan’s war atrocities — including the Nanjing massacre — he said they were covered in the Class B and Class C trials.[1]
Furthermore, he believed that the exclusion of Western colonialism and the use of the atom bomb by the United States from the list of crimes, and judges from the vanquished nations on the bench, signified the "failure of the Tribunal to provide anything other than the opportunity for the victors to retaliate." [2] In this he was not alone among Indian jurists of the time, one prominent Calcutta barrister writing that the Tribunal was little more than "a sword in a wig". Fear of American nuclear power was an international phenomenon following the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

thats due to that war crimes happened by both parties.every country performed crime against other country by waging wars and killing millions of civilians mercilessly..But always winner writes the history.If Japanese generals are War Criminals,then what about American Generals who nuked millions of civilians in Japan??They are still your hero,right??thats what I say matter of perception..

German War Memorials


thats not against something against any country but to honor their own soldiers..Japan fought hundreds of battles against
various countries.and its the honor they are showing their dead soldiers,its not against any country..

 

[Jungibaaz]

Shameless people.
Disgraceful comments from their leader.

 

[applesauce]

Noob chinese,thats what germany did..they don't make ceremony about Hitler and Himler though,but hundreds of war memorials are still exists in Germany..and for the word criminal,I think you should read what Justice Radha Vinod Pal(Indian member of International Military Tribunal for the Far East) said about it...

"I might mention in this connection that even the published accounts of Nanking 'rape' could not be accepted by the world without some suspicion of exaggeration... Referring to the same incident, Sir Charles Addis on that occasion could say: 'Between two countries at war there was always a danger that one or other of the combatants would seek to turn public opinion in his favour by resort to a propaganda in which incidents, inseparable alas from all hostilities, were magnified and distorted for the express purpose of inflaming prejudice and passion and obscuring the real issues of the conflict.'"

pretty sure you are just a troll, but..

dont compare germany to japan, this would be an insult to germany.

germany has apologized in every way and the world has forgiven them as they should. japan however has continued to whitewash its history and refuse to admit something as basic as its war crimes. japan builds shrine to and worships class AAA war criminals as determined by the war tribunal, in germany any worship of nazis is banned and can land u in jail. any offical in germany darning to say hitler is great and the holocaust didnt happen will get fired immediately and sent to jail, in japan the pm, the very top of their government, can refute widely known war crimes and worship convited criminals and have nothing happen to him.

would the jews be mad if the german government officials started saying hitler was great, he never harmed the jews, and germany of ww2 only wanted to help europe develop, then starting building and visiting shirne to hitler? of course they would be mad, as they should

same situation here, the chinese, koreans, and other asians are angry about these shrines and the behavior of the japanese government, as they should be

 

[BDforever]

It would be better if Japan said there was no WWII, that is a fairy tail

 

[BoXilai]

Japanese has right to think so, no one can bans them. I'm sure although Abe accept they were invaders, Chinese will not stop ideological hatred. When Chinese are victims, they reacts violently but when they make crimes, their attitude is very impassible.

 

[Genesis]

Japanese has right to think so, no one can bans them. I'm sure although Abe accept they were invaders, Chinese will not stop ideological hatred. When Chinese are victims, they reacts violently but when they make crimes, their attitude is very impassible.

As oppose to the japanese current reaction on diaoyu island?

 

[BoXilai]

As oppose to the japanese current reaction on diaoyu island?

Do you understand what I mean?

 

[Genesis]

Do you understand what I mean?

yea, you said when China is the victim we scream foul, and when we are the aggressor we support it.

All the Japanese are doing is in reverse first aggressor then victim, and we first victim then aggressor.

How is what I said not true and not to your point

 

[SURYA-1]

I hope he could do something in diaoyu islands other than barking.

I hope he could do something in diaoyu islands other than barking.

He overtaken that Senkaku island. What else do you want ??

 

[Sedqal]

There should be some Japanese here to provide their side of story