Here are some important points which I have noted to discuss.This report is an excellent
analysis as it highlights the weak spots of our infrastructure of various sectors.
Mainly,there was a common impression in my mind before reading that
due to security lapse and weakness of our intelligence sectors,only this incident took place.
Only our law and enforcement agencies were observed guilty or responsible.
but the events highlighted above also raise questions about those sectors which are given under
the authority of civil regime.
Page No 56:
Chapter 5:Residents of kala Dhaka/Tor ghar
Abdul Munaf,resident of Kandar,Hassanzai on September 29th,2011.He was reported
to have born eyewitness to the landing to two US.helicopters on the night of May1 and 2
However he denied being an eyewitness to the commission to Abbottabad where he admitted
to having walked toward the helicopters which had apparently landed on an area
near his corps.He tired to greet the Americans thinking they were Pakistanis.He
was surrounded by them and tied up,and was later released .It was not clear whether he was
released as the helicopters towards Abbottabad or back towards Jalabad.Most likely,
he was kept tied up and under guard for the duration of Operation.
COMMISSION'S OBSERVATION:
He first told the commission that he saw nothing of the helicopters that landed near his field.
ter on summoned to Abbottabad,he went back on his story and admitted he was detained by US
Navy SEALS. there was no proper explanation for his lying to the commission on the first occasion
other then he felt pressurized to do so,by whom?There may,however be perfectly innocent explanation that
he was too embarrassed to admit to being tied up by the Americans
These reasons also seems possible to me:
--If you read the initial of the report,you will find out that during operation,they harrassed
women saying:"We will come back after 2 hours" so that they remain still inside..
So,this is also a possiblity that witness was harrassed as well and was told
to keep his mouth shut.
Where as following points are also highlighted from commission report:
--If XEN Operations have notice the use,and must have reported our Law agencies about
this excessive usage then possible measures maybe taken.But due to his negligence,
we were unable to detect any unusual attitude.
--Although,according to the director,who met commission on September 2011 said that Land
cannot be given to any foreigner,however a Pakistani has full right to buy it.THe explanation he gave
that OBL Compound was brought by the name of Pakistani Muhammad Arshad in the name of Abrar and after this
incident,when investigation takeplace the IDS were found stolen or fake.
This clearly questions that why Mr Abrar was not investigated before handling the property?
To avoid this in future I suggest:
--Buyer must be verified completely before handling a property in such area.
--His ID's must be checked by Nadra..
--If records are not found,then he must be reported to intelligence agencies.
--As mentioned in Page 61,65,102 the director was not eligible to take charge.Then how he
was given such an important vacancy??This clearly questions the selection system.
If an eligible man was given a seat rather then retired brigadier with poor knowledge then
such ignorance does not take place.
As point no 103 clearly admits:
-According to the director"ten years of bad rule in the department has destroyed it"
A non-professional retired brigadier who knew very little about the job,a/c to him
was appointed head of the department.No action was taken against CEO.An inquiry into the
to the matter is now initiated.
@
Aeronaut @
WebMaster