we don't need an ICBM bro
We do need it, we need to look beyond the Eastern Border and have capability to target any nation which threatens us.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we don't need an ICBM bro
No, if we will then get ready for extreme sanctions like North Korea/Iran haveWe do need it, we need to look beyond the Eastern Border and have capability to target any nation which threatens us.
the chap was head of design and one of the 1st PHD qualifier from USA working in that organization....he was hanged...
I was just talking about the dimensions e.g the diameter mobility etc if we put The loadwe don't need an ICBM bro
Main reason for cancelling ghauri-3 not that you stated but main reason for cancelling ghauri 3 was liquid based system and takes hours to fuel and launch hence it easy target for the enemy preemptive strike (India)The time to test an ICBM is when we are faced with a valid threat. With Shaheen 3 the range was increased to such a specific amount one can't help but think uncle sam is watching the missile program closely, since shaheen 3 could hit israel from west balochistan but Pakistan had to emphasise it was to strike India. Similarly Musharraf terminated the Ghauri-3 program (iirc) because it would bring Israel into striking range. I can't imagine the American's reaction if Pakistan increases the range without any valid reason. Increasing the range would also bring Chinese and European cities into range which will not be good for diplomacy and the economy.
We can use MIRV with maneuverable warheads and does we need IRBM also???I was just talking about the dimensions e.g the diameter mobility etc if we put The load
Of an mirv bus with penaids on this one it will end up in the range of an I.r.b.m.
We need heavy lifters not for range but for
1) higher apogee 2) higher speed to evade abms 3) to lift heavy mirv bus with lots of penaids so
If you want a sizable and survivable bus yesMain reason for cancelling ghauri-3 not that you stated but main reason for cancelling ghauri 3 was liquid based system and takes hours to fuel and launch hence it easy target for the enemy preemptive strike (India)
We can use MIRV with maneuverable warheads and does we need IRBM also???
Speed doesn't guarantee to hit the target trajectory is predictableIf you want a sizable and survivable bus yes
It will give us 1) higher apogee 2) higher speed to evade abms 3) to lift heavy mirv bus with lots of penaids 4) shoot and scoot( mobility)
capability. We will need all of the above if India buys thaad missiles. And they will
and then there is a small problem of us ages system with sm -3 missiles in arabian sea so I hope you understand what I am contemplating.
It's not just speed and we don't have marvs for our mrbms at this point in time.Speed doesn't guarantee to hit the target trajectory is predictable
And tell me India buying THAAD they are buying s400 from Russia done deal and Israel using arrow-3 MANEUVERABLE warheads will have more chance to hit the target because of unpredictable trajectories
remember Shaheen 1A bro it said to be have some kind of anti abm tech on it, most probably boost glide vehicleIt's not just speed and we don't have marvs for our mrbms at this point in time.
Good enough for now but not for the future.remember Shaheen 1A bro it said to be have some kind of anti abm tech on it, most probably boost glide vehicle
its not boost glide vehicle. How could a 1,000 km missile could have glide capability? Do you even know what a boost glide vehicle is?remember Shaheen 1A bro it said to be have some kind of anti abm tech on it, most probably boost glide vehicle
We do, but not before we have a stable thriving independent economy and a self sufficient defence industry.we don't need an ICBM bro