=================
Sir plz never speak big words .... Your country is passing form the the very same phase .... RELIGIOUSLY MOTIVATED NEO NATIONALISM .... you people will witness its full effect after some time but will realize its immediate effect 'soon'
According to your tinted glasses as you have never known anything other than religious theocracy. Thus whatever you look at , all you can focus on is the religion and nationalism. Anti incumbency and rhetorical noises and anti corruption issues that causes a change in government causes a political change, but all you can focus on is religion, but then again i do sympathize with the position. being a nation that is progeny of AIML, all you want to focus on is the other fringe on the opposite side of the spectrum, ignoring the successful democratic rule and governance in accordance to a sacrosanct constitution since the inception of the republic.
& India adventure in 1971 just after the Indo-Russian agreement .... what was that ... History of your country have no such events ...??
So 1971's was was based on Indo-Russian agreement? or was the root cause lying somewhere else. The statement is so ludicrous that it's not even worth discussion, but if you want we can touch on this later.
just to remind you Kargil was with us till 1971 which India capture it in that year, secondly Kargil was planed as a local level operation not as a full-fledged war ....
So was op Gibraltor, and brasstacks in 65, how did that work out for you. I hope you don't want to hear from your military generals about state of planning and preparations that you brass is quite famous for. In other words your establishment quite terrible at planning, managing and containing conflicts in any stage irrespective of it's detterence levels vis-a-vis India.
Thirdly most important lesson of the Kargil episode is that you can not judge the reaction of your opponent before time a miscalculation at the time planing of Kargil operation about the reaction of India bring both state at the verge of war this also indicate the BIGGEST mutual weakness of India & Pakistan as NUCLEAR STATE that both countries don't haven any agreed ESCALATION LADDER so there is no guarantee that which country will take what measure at the time of crises.
Siachin was initiated by Indian forces, did it snowball into a full scale war? The imprtant lesson than neither you or your military is aware of strategic planning, where you weigh all of the outcomes of your action, and plan for the wort possible outcome. That is how Risk Management in all aspects i handled all over. Like for example this missile, we will consider it as a fully functional MIRV nuclear asset deployed against all strategic targets in India and add that to our threat perception.
& Lastly do you think Kargil was a right incident (crossing the frontiers) at right time (after the nuclearization of South Asia) if not then it there any mechanism or guarantee that no such event form both side will occur again ....???
Especially when one of the party is prone to whims and fancies of dictatorial regime every couple of decades, there is no judging what it can do.
If India can move its Navy in response to a local level operation of Kargil, then why the Indians think Pakistan will not respond with ALL THE RESOURCES AT ITS DISPOSAL ....
When have I stated that Pakistan will no respond with all resources at it's disposal. please show me.
Usual Indian rhetoric .... ?? have you put some thought to it .... ???
Pakistan Military even at time when it rule Pakistan always engage India with Dialogues, secondly its does not require India as enemy for its existence particularly after 1979 it have many option.... think yourself
A military that's sole objective is minimum detterence against India, whose entire orientation is based on India, does not require India. Sound odd but sure your military your choice. Count the number of years of democratice rule vs military rule in Pakistan you will gt the answer of political relevance of your military.
BTW should quote anti Pakistan speeches of Indian politicians at the time of elections ....??
Who is required to go to General public after every 5 years ... politicians or some institution ...???
Yes please do quote the Anti-Pakistan Speeches of Elected representatives that deal with Foreign affairs. What they are stating is the general feeling in India. A nation that since it's existence has taken pride in killing Indian civilians via it's proxies right from will have public backlash in India. It's part of national identity.
Who need JOB SECURITY ... politicians or some institution ...???
Who is required to prove themselves PATRIOT in front of general public ... politicians or some institution ...??
How is that relevant, when your military junta doesn't need a mandate. It can march it's div in your airports and capital and dethrone your political leader in a day as demonstrated by Musharraf. When he ousted nawz sharif, you may see it as right or wrong, that;s up to you. What he really did was oust the Public Mandate of 200 million pakistanis. It doesn't need prove anything to anyone, all it needs is consolidation of it's power and your constitution till very recently provided such avenue to it.
Biggest of all
POLITICIANS OF WHICH COUNTRY ARE SELLING THE DREAMS OF WORLD POWER .... WITH HALF POPULATION IN POVERTY .... INDIA OR PAKISTAN ... ??
So who has more chances of failure INDIAN POLITICIAN or PAKISTANI MILITARY ....???
From the track record it is Pakistani Politicans? just answer how many years of Democratic rule? lol