What's new

A brilliant half an hour long interview summing up India.

This guy (Aakar Patel) lays waste to India's democracy, judiciary, secularism. He also sums up shallow Ideology of Hindutva in a few sentences. I really was shocked that so called biggest democracy doesn't have freedom of religion, you need Government's consent to change religions. One of the primary promoters of Islamophobia in India are its banana courts... A lot of other revelations in a short time.

India is a robust thriving democracy and people are free to say what's on their mind. Criticize the government, abuse the PM, question the highest court in the land, ridicule the way of life practiced by the majority, make fun of the gods. This very video you posted is proof of it.

Look for content by Ravish Kumar, Ashok Swain, Shehla Rashid, Umar Khalid, Swara Bhasker, Akash Banerjee, Dhruv Rathee etc.. there is no shortage of dissenters/anti Modi people here if you like this type of content.

Then there are the hindutva ideologues, Rajiv Malhotra, Pushpendra Kulshreshtra, Subramaniam Swamy etc, and goras Konerad Elst, David Frawley, Francois Gautier, Mitchel Danino.

You should look at their points of view as well to get a more balanced nuanced picture. It's kind of silly and self defeating to mindlessly bash India the way the overwhelming majority of Pakistanis seem to do on this forum.
 
India isn't a tolerant society by any means, but surely it is a functioning democracy, that much can't be denied. As bad as India might be, as a democracy it is a million times superior to one party state, authoritarian China.

And what about Pakistan. The opposition claims the PTI rigged the elections in 2018. The same PTI accused PMLN of rigging elections in 2013. So Pakistan's last two elections were either both rigged or at least one of those elections were rigged.


the point is india is a shithole filled with dishonestly

dont compare your selves with China... they are way better than you lot.
 
Last edited:
He also said the Messiah will come and the Mahdi will come.

But since you raised the subject, let me ask, is Prophesy (Nubuwwah) a blessing or curse? If it is a blessing why has it ceased? So the best Ummah is deprived of a blessing that God blessed an inferior Ummah (Bani Israel) with in abundance? Consider this carefully, reflect on it deeply

Qur'an partial[5:3]

الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ وَأَتْمَمْتُ عَلَيْكُمْ نِعْمَتِي وَرَ‌ضِيتُ لَكُمُ الْإِسْلَامَ دِينًا
This day have I perfected your religion for you, completed My favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir:
Once a Jew said to me, "O the chief of believers! There is a verse in your Holy Book Which is read by all of you (Muslims), and had it been revealed to us, we would have taken that day on which it was revealed as a day of celebration." 'Umar bin Al-Khattab asked, "Which is that verse?" The Jew replied, "This day I have perfected your religion For you, completed My favour upon you, And have chosen for you Islam as your religion." (5:3) 'Umar replied, "No doubt, we know when and where this verse was revealed to the Prophet. It was Friday and the Prophet was standing at 'Arafa."

Question: Why would a jew make a point out of this specific verse? It had a very specific implication as well, especially being the farewell Hajj and Ibn Kathir notates that unbeknownst to him that some schmucks will come precisely challenging this statement.

That besides the point qadiani viewpoint not only requires bending if not rejecting Qur'an, it fundamentally contradicts Ahadith...among them ones reported by Thawban ibn Kaidad and Hudhayfah ibn al-Yaman are definitely relevant.

Prophethood is all about message:

"Indeed, We sent Nooh to his people and he said, 'O my people! Worship Allaah! You have no other ilaah (god) but Him. Certainly, I fear for you the torment of a Great Day!'" [al-A'raaf 7:59]

"Indeed We have sent Our Messengers with clear proofs, and revealed with them the Scriptures and the Balance (justice) that mankind may keep up justice" [al-Hadeed 57:24]

"Whoever goes right, then he goes right only for the benefit of his own self. And whoever goes astray, then he goes astray to his own loss. No one laden with burdens can bear another's burden. And We never punish until We have sent a Messenger (to give warning)." [al-Isra' 17:15]

"Messengers as bearers of good news as well as of warning in order that mankind should have no plea against Allaah after the Messengers" [al-Nisa' 4:165]

But the message is delivered

"Similarly (to complete My Blessings on you), We have sent among you a Messenger (Muhammad) of your own, reciting to you Our Verses (the Qur’aan) and purifying you, and teaching you the Book (the Qur’aan) and the Hikmah, and teaching you that which you used not to know”
[al-Baqarah 2:151]

“And treat not the Verses (Laws) of Allaah as a jest, but remember Allaah’s Favours on you (i.e. Islam), and that which He has sent down to you of the Book (i.e. the Qur’aan) and Al-Hikmah whereby He instructs you. And fear Allaah, and know that Allaah is All-Aware of everything”
[al-Baqarah 2:231]

Message is sealed!

"This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion”
[al-Maa’idah 5:3]

"Verily, We, it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Qur’aan) and surely, We will guard it (from corruption)”
[al-Hijr 15:9]

Prophet(A.S.) obey...

"And (remember) when Allaah took the Covenant of the Prophets, saying: ‘Take whatever I gave you from the Book and Hikmah, and afterwards there will come to you a Messenger (Muhammad) confirming what is with you; you must, then, believe in him and help him.’ Allaah said: ‘Do you agree (to it) and will you take up My Covenant (which I conclude with you)?’ They said: ‘We agree.’ He said: ‘Then bear witness; and I am with you among the witnesses (for this)’”
[Aal ‘Imraan 3:81]


“And thus We have sent to you (O Muhammad) Rooh (a revelation, and a mercy) of Our Command. You knew not what is the Book, nor what is Faith? But We have made it (this Qur’aan) a light wherewith We guide whosoever of Our slaves We will. And verily, you (O Muhammad) are indeed guiding (mankind) to the Straight Path. The path of Allaah to Whom belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth. Verily, all matters at the end go to Allaah (for decision)”
[al-Shoora 42:52-53]


“By the star when it goes down (or vanishes).
Your companion (Muhammad) has neither gone astray nor has erred. Nor does he speak of (his own) desire. It is only a Revelation revealed”
[al-Najm 53:1-4]


Say (O Muhammad): ‘If Allaah had so willed, I should not have recited it to you nor would He have made it known to you. Verily, I have stayed amongst you a life time before this. Have you then no sense?’”
[Yoonus 10:15, 16]



This is what you seek ...

“Do they seek other than the religion of Allaah, while to Him submitted all creatures in the heavens and the earth, willingly or unwillingly. And to Him shall they all be returned”
[Aal ‘Imraan 3:82]
 
Last edited:
You mean Chuhras? Yes, they're free to work in the sewers perpetually.
Admit it, Pakistan and India have the same social problems. Caste and religion based discrimination. Corruption and police brutality. Pakistan has no face to criticize India for ill treatment of Muslims, Dalits and others when in Pakistan Ahmadis and Christians are also mistreated and discriminated against. If India has laws against conversion, Pakistan has blasphemy laws. Pakistan needs to get its act together. Pakistan must reconcile with America and the West. Pakistan must seriously implement full human rights like in the West.

I'm sick of this BS of the oppressed minority. What stops a religious minority in Pakistan achieving success? If a poor man from Swat can travel to Karachi to sell vegetables on a wagon what stops them? If that poor man from Swat can build a stone wall for my neighbour in AJK, what stops them? If people from my village can travel to Muree to work as cleaners what stops them?

The poor have the same economic disadvantages regardless of religion.

Try not being a Jatt and winning an election in our seat. Try not being a rajput and winning an election in the neighbouring seat. That's not religious discrimination - it's caste based.
 
Qur'an partial[5:3]
...

My Mujahid brother, hold your horses. Insha-Allah I will not die, or sleep, without posting a response to him. Lol. May Allah reward you for your good. Ameen.

I do this all day, every day. My Magnus opus response to a Qadiyani on issue of Khatamiyyah, ascension of Prophet Isa, Imam Mahdi, Mirza's character, his contradictory teaching, was 277 A4 pages. And I wrote all that in 5 days, 18 hours a day. Unfortunately I posted it on Qadiyani forum and a Islamic forum and I did not save it on my own computer. Qadiyanis deleted it from their forum, and the Sunni forum went offline. And my lazyness cost me a pdf. I was thinking I will do it, tomarrow, i still got it, I can do it tomarrow, soon as i finish this article, and ... i lost it all... Be paitent. Insha-Allah I will post it before i sleep.
 
Cherub786 Said:
“He also said the Messiah will come and the Mahdi will come.”

For the following I will abstain from quoting referrences but at any point you want one. Please do not hold back. I will be more then happy to quote direct differences as requried.

(01) He also said al-Maseeh will fight Dajjal and will Kill him at gate of Ludd (biggest sraeli millitary airfield in Ludd). Your Maseeh was minor Dajjal because non of it was fullfilled by Mirza.
(02) Will descend on Masjid in Syria. Mirza was born in Punjab to house of Charagh BiBi and lived and died in India. And didnt even to to Hajj or Umrah or Syria.
(03) He will descend get married and die and burried next to grave of Prophet. Mirza died due to excessive jalab/jalav/peychas on a toilet. And was buried in Qadiyan.
(04) We also know name of his mother was Maryam and he was born without a males interaction ... Mirza was born to Charagh Bibi and was Son of some Mirza Maja Gama (I dont know his fathers name). How can he be Maseeh Ibn Maryam? O becuz Mirza Ghulam got pregnant with himself being in his own womb ... Reference to his dream.
(05) Wahi came to Prophets via Gibraeel n Mirza said angel Teechi Teechi comes to him delivering reports. Proof that he was lieing.
(06) Maseeh Ibn Maryam was sent to Bani Israeel and Mirza said I have been sent as maseeh and later as a new prophet to to mankind and Wahi comes to me. Yet Wahis gate has been closed and no prophet will recieve Wahi after last final prophet muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wassallam).
(07) I can go on and on … Including about wars that Mahdi and Maseeeh Ibn Maryam will fight. And all this we will prove is Mirza was a al-Kazzab and al-Dajjal.
(08) Just one example. Mahdi will be forced to accept Bayyah in contrast ur Mahdi was forcing others to give Bayyah to him. And literally writing 1000 LANNAT for people for opposing him and writing those who do not accept him as children of whores and wild pigs. If u want I can find these referrences for u n others to read.
(09) Hadith also says Jesus will perform Salah behind Imam Mahdi even when Mahdi insists Prophet Isa lead prayers but Mirza said Mahdi and Isa both of them are me.If he made Hakim Noor al-Din as Mahdi and himself became al-Maseeh we could say, Hey he tried, but self centered ego maniac could not accept anyone else rivalling him and hogging lime light so he said I am both al-Maseeh al-Mahdi.
(10) Prophet said Imam Mahdis name will be my name, Muhammad/Ahmad, and his father’s name will be name of Prophets father, Abdullah. Mirza’s name was Ahmad but his fathers name was Mirza Ghulam Murtaza.
(11) Also Imam al-Mahdi will be Syed from children of Fatimah (radiallah ta’ala anha), and descendent of Imam Hassan Ibn Ali (radiallah ta’ala anhu). Mirza was from Mughal Barlas caste/qaum.

Conclusion: Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani did not comply with any sign which Prophet told al-Maseeh and al-Mahdi will have. He was a liar and a mini-Dajjal (i.e. mini impostor), and a false claimant of prophet-hood, for whom words al-Kazzaab (i.e. the arch liar). I can go on to about 35 such undeniable facts off top of my head but you all get the point.

Cherub786 Said:
"But since you raised the subject, let me ask:
(i) Is Prophesy (Nubuwwah) a blessing or curse?
(ii) If it is a blessing why has it ceased?
(iii) So the best Ummah is deprived of a blessing that God blessed an inferior Ummah (Bani Israel) with in abundance?
Consider this carefully, reflect on it deeply."
I do request you too think really deeply intelligently and Quranicly/Hadithly read and then respond.


Sorry. I couldn't write essay on phone so i had to switch my PC on. I will begin. with remaining part of your post. I have really deeply, intelligently, clearly, and Quranicly thought about what you asked and to write all that required time.

Question 1: (i) Is Prophesy (Nubuwwah) a blessing or curse?
Answer to Q1: Nabuwah of Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was'sallam) and all Prophets was Rahma/mercy.

I want to ask you something:

(i) Are you saying stop of Nabuwah is a curse?
(ii) If that is the case then 600 years between Prophet Isa and Prophet Muhammad there was no Nabi/Rasool during that period did Nabuwah became curse?
(iii) What is your basis for your belief/understanding:
(a) Stop of Nabuwah temporarily would not amounts to Nabuwah being curse/barbarity/injustice?
(b) Stop of Nabuwah permanently would a amount to Nabuwah; being curse/barbarity/injustice?

Bring forward your proof if you're truthful. You have nothing but your Qadiyani preachers and yourself as proof. Quran al-Kareem talks about people like you saying such people claim to be Lords/Gods beside Allah (subhanahu wa ta'ala) for inventing a religion: "Have you seen the one who takes as his god his own desire? Then would you be responsible for him?" [Ref: 25:43] “Have you seen he who has taken his desire as his god, and Allah has sent him astray due to knowledge, and has set a seal upon his hearing and his heart, and put over his vision a veil? So who will guide him after Allah? Then will you not be reminded?” [Ref: 45:23] Regarding those who follow others when they invent religious verdicts Allah says: They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allah , and the Messiah, the son of Mary. And they were not commanded except to worship one God; there is no deity except Him. Exalted is He above whatever they associate with Him.” [Ref: 9:31] If you have no proof from Quran/Sunnah and Ijmah of Ummah you’re one of the two, one who makes himself God, meaning makes religion, decides what religion is, and what he will follow. So give me evidence for whichever tickles your fancy from (a) or (b). I am expecting that you will come back saying, Mullahs have brain-washed you, you’re hate filled, go read book of Mirza he will answer your questions. In reality I do not need to proceed further because foundation on which you’re making your argument is made up and based on, I am Allah, and I can make up religion as I please. I wouldn’t expect any different because you’re following Mirza and he invented and distorted entire Islam.

Question 2: (ii) If it is a blessing why has it ceased?
Answer to Q2: It is mercy and it has ceased because Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) wanted to close the gate of Nabuwah. And why He decided to close the gate of Nabuwah? I don’t know 100% but rest assured I will do my very best IJTIHAD and provide you a very compelling/convincing why He closed the gate of Nabuwah. Let it begin. This will be answered theologically and rationally. Following will be theologically and next post will be rationally and historically.

Answer To Q2 - Part One – Foundation From Quran And Sunnah:

You’re best of people ever raised from mankind enjoining good and forobidding evil: “You are the best nation raised up for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and you believe in Allah. If only the People of the Scripture had believed, it would have been better for them (though) among them are believers, but most of them are disobedient.” [Ref: 3:110] And in another verse Allah said: “And let there arise from you a group inviting to all that is good, enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong, and those will be successful." [Ref: 3:104] What these two verses come to mean is Ummah of RasoolAllah will continue to practice preach and join in all that is good according to Islam and Ummah will continue to abstain from munkir/bad/sin and continue to preach against it and prohibit others from engaging in all that is evil/sin/shirk/kufr. And as result of this state of Ummah’s Islam/Iman will remain good.

States of Ummah will remain good until the day of judgment: "Narrated Humaid: I heard Muawiya bin Abi Sufyan delivering a sermon. He said, "I heard the Prophet saying, "If Allah wants to do a favor to somebody, He bestows on him, the gift of understanding the Qur'an and Sunna. I am but a distributor, and Allah is the Giver. The state of this nation will remain good till the Hour is established, or till Allah's Order comes." [Ref: Bukhari, B92, H415, here.] In another Hadith Prophet said the Ummah will remain victorious over the opponents till the day of judgment: “Narrated Muawiya: Allah's Messenger said, "If Allah wants to do good for somebody, he makes him comprehend the religion (of Islam). And Allah is the Giver and I am Al-Qasim (the distributor). And this (Muslim) nation will remain victorious over their opponents, till Allah's Order comes and they will still be victorious." [Ref: Bukhari, B53, H346, here.] This means Ummah of RasoolAllah will remain upon Islam until the day of judgment.And those who oppose the Ummah, Qadiyanis and others, will not be winners. Rather the Ummah will remain upon good state of Islam/Iman till the judgment day and remain victorious their adversaries till judgment day. And this will be so because Mujadids will revive Islam.[1]

Prophet said Mujadids revive religion of Islam at every century: "He also reported among the material he knew to come from God’s messenger that he said, "At the beginning of every century God will send one who will renew its religion for this people.” Abu Dawud transmitted it." [Ref: Mishkat ul-Masabih, Kitab ul-Ilm, B2, H43, here.] Same Hadith has been narrated by Imam Abu Dawood in his Sunan Abu Dawood but online version of Sunan Abu Dawood is missing two volumes therefore no Hadith does not appear in search engine. Anyhow the Mujadids in Ummah of RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’allam) revive Islamic teaching and remove the rubbish that has become associated with Islam and end up purifying Islam in their books/speeches. And result of this purification is that in area where Mujadid is born the revitalised pure Islam begins to take hold. And if it gets corrupted a new Mujadid is born in the same area. Where ever, and when ever corruption of Islam takes place and it becomes difficult to decipher Islam from innovation/misguidance then Mujadid revives Islam.[2] Mujadids guard against biddah/innovation.

Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said any action/matter which is not from Allah and Messenger is rejected: Sa'd b. Ibrahim reported: I asked Qasim b. Muhammad about a person who had three dwelling houses and he willed away the third part of every one of these houses; he (Qasim b. Muhammad) said: All of them could be combined in one house; and then said: 'A'isha informed me that Allah's Messenger said: He who did any act for which there is no sanction from our behalf, that is to be rejected. [Ref: Muslim, Book 18, Hadith 4267, here.] 'A'isha reported Allah's Messenger as saying: He who innovates things in our affairs for which there is no valid (reason) (commits sin) and these are to be rejected. [Ref: Muslim, Book 18, Hadith 4266, here.] There are different translations of this Hadith – translators have translated them in light of commentaries, here, here, instead of literally. And in another he said every (such) innovation is misguidance and every misguidance takes to hellfire: “And he would join his forefinger and middle finger; and would further say: "The best of the speech is embodied in the Book of Allah, and the best of the guidance is the guidance given by Muhammad. And the most evil affairs are their innovations; and every innovation is error." [Ref: Muslim, Book 4, Hadith 1885, here.] Every/kullu is always used in a restricted context. Ali drank all/kull water. Restricted to how much Ali can drink, a glass, bottle, jug, matka, so kull/all is restricted. Same when ever kullu is used in context of Quran/Hadith in regards to creation it is limited/restricted some how. Only time kullu is not limited/restricted is when it refers to Allah’s qualities/knowledge … then it is in meaning of unlimited. Even though it says kullu it does not include Sahih Bukhari is misguidance. Kullu is restricted to context of invented things/matters and actions which are not from Allah and Rasool. In other words every innovation which does not agree with teaching of Islam is rejcted and anywho adopts this innovation is upon misguidance and will enter fire. This teaching is introduced for protecting Islam from innovation. And it is part and parcell of perfect/completion of Islam.[3]

Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) says the religion of Islam, has been perfected/completed: "Today, I have perfected your religion for you, and have completed My blessing upon you, and chosen Islam as Dīn (religion and a way of life) for you. But whoever is compelled by extreme hunger, having no inclination towards sin, then Allah is Most-Forgiving, Very-Merciful." [Ref: 5:3] Note religion of former Prophets was also Islam. And Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) says religion of Islam meaning the religion of Islam which all Prophets were teaching has been perfected/completed. And when the religion is completed and perfected then why send more Prophets. Suppose you made a perfect square can you make it more perfect then your perfection? Your perfection might have defects but the perfected/completed religion of Allah doesn’t need any more perfection because when Allah says it is perfect/complete then it is perfect/complete beyond need of improvments.[4] This section is concluded in footnote FOUR. And that is where answer to your question is.

FootNotes:

[1] As per Qadiyanism only Mirza’s followers are following true Islam and the rest are all liars and angry Mullahs spreading hate and persecuting people. These Ahadith completely undo the lie of Qadiyanism because it states Islam from time of Prophet to the judgment day will be pure/true. If we go by Qadiyanism and those who believe there can be no Prophet after Prophet Muhammad and Khatamiyyah means last/final Prophet have been upon falsehood and will remain so till judgment day. Anyhow state of Ummah will remain good and they will remain victorious because Mujadids will revive true teaching of Islam.
[2] I am going to focus on just one part. As per Qadiyanism the al-Maseeh and Imam al-Mahdi are one and the same. And this is against Ijmahi understanding and against clear emphatic text of Ahadith. NO MUJADID HAS COME AND SAID … HEY, HEY, WAT-AP MATIES, THIS IS WRONG. Only Mirza claimed said this is wrong. Not only this Mirza also distored meaning of Khatamiyyah which the entire Jammah of of Mufassireen/Mujtahideen/Mujtahideen said means last/final read Khatam, or Khatim. Instead Qadiyanis have said Khatam is in meaning of signet-ring. Which is Majazi meaning and there is no reason to choose Majazi meaning when Haqiqi/Zahiri meaning of last/final is in agreement with prophetic teaching. Prophet himself said Khatam means last, final, Aqib (i.e. one at the end of line).
[3] So this mechanism will allow some innovations but others it will prohibit and deem rejected. This teaching is part of perfection/completion of Islam. And corner stone which protects Islam from corruption. Prophets before last/final Prophet could not spread this and did not have this mechanism in their religions to protect themselves from corruption. Islam having this is demonstration of completion/perfection of Islam.


[4] When the religion is perfected/completed to a degree when no improvements needs to be made. Then there is no need for a new Prophet. Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) declared it complete/perfect and there was/is no need for another Prophet. No need for Mirza, or Bab, or Baha-ullah, or anyone else for that matter. To say and to believe more Prophets are needed; is to say religion of Islam was not completed/perfected. Every Prophet that was sent was either sent to teach Islam from scratch, or reknew aspects of religion which the people have distorted but same cannot be said for Islam because Mujtahid/Mujadids were continously reviving/purifying Islam upto present and will continue till the day of judgment. Thus removing need of Prophets. The jobs which the Prophets of Bani Israeel did before Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) the Mujadideen/Mujtahideen of this Ummah are doing. This is why Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said station of scholars of my Ummah would be of Prophets of Bani Israel. These scholars were not your daily joe Maulvis/Mullahs but Mujadideen and Mujtahideen of Ummah. This Hadith is Khabr Mashoor and narrated by Imam Fakhr al-Din al-Raazi (rahimullah) in his Tafsir ul-Kabeer. Khabr Mashoor is what Ummah accepts it is also called Ummat Talluqi bil-Qubul. It is recorded in Hadith: “Whatever Muslims deem to be good, is good in the sight of God and whatever they deem evil, is evil in the sight of God" [recorded by Ahmed] Even if saying scholars will have station of Prphets of Bani Israeel is not Hadith it is a Athar of a companion. And even if that is not true its meaning and understanding is true. The job of Mujadideen/Mujtahideen of Ummah is Tat’heer purification which is what Prophets of previous nations also did.

Answer To Q2 - Part Two A – State Of Ummah of Prophet Muhammad:

Question 2:
(ii) “If it is a blessing why has it ceased?”
Answer to Q2: Ummah of RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) was is best of Ummah. ISLAM became it’s inner and out. Islam became a system and its teaching took hold in lands, hearts, minds, and souls of people. Its teaching were established by Muslims upon themselves and they took the Noor of Islam and established states/kingdoms upon it. Islam was/is learnt, and taught. Its core teaching of Tawheed, worship, charity, and virtually every aspect of it remains in knowledge of people and in books. Its scripture, Quran, and prophetic explanation i.e. the Sunnah remain with us. Every 100 year a Mujadid is born. Where where ever Islam gets corrupted and begins to loose its true form the Mujadid revives its spirit and teaching again and performs Ijtihad in light of Islamic core teachings and updates it to fit into then society. Islamic teaching of good/bad are still known. And Muslims still enjoin good and forbid evil. Tawheed is still dominant, and worship of Allah still performed by Muslims. Islam contains within it mechanism of revival, protection against biddah/innovation. Despite there are Ijtihadi disputes in Fiqh and some aspects of Aqahid there is no dispute over what is clearly stated in Quran/Sunnah. Pig is Haram amongst all, Kufr takes out of Islam, Shirk is not allowed, worship of others beside Allah is unanimously not allowed. They have disputes in these aspects but the principle on which they dispute on is unanimously held. All say Shirk is wrong. Allah has no partner. Worship is of Allah, Fasting is in Month of Ramadhan, Hajj is to be performed in places stated. And regardless their disputes they have a uncorrupted scripture and Sunnah. The dominant Islam/sect is of Ahlus Sunnah, the Wahhabis, Deobandis, Shias, and other factions, in total would not amount to 25% of total world Muslim population. So state of Islam is good, and Prophet said stick to the Jammah, the main-body, the Jamhoor i.e. majority when disputes arise. But despite these disputes Prophet said state of his Ummah will be good. He said about the whole Ummah/majority. Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) said, Allah will perfect it, and protect it promote it. He took the burden of protecting Islam upon Himself. And said: "It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth, to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikoon hate it." [Ref: 9:33] This means Islam will remain upon earth and become superior/dominant. And according to Hadith this will happen during life time of Imam Mahdi and when Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) returns. They will live, die, and Allah will send a cold/musky fragrant wind which will take life of kullu muslimun wa mominun (all muslims and all righteous-believers). Those who will be left on earth, atheists, kafirs of other type will return of idol worship. So Islam will stay and will stay strong from time of Prophet till death of Muslims before judgment day. Why Muslims would die before judgment day? Another story. To put it simply Allah doesn’t want to torment Muslims by inflicting destruction what would precdeed judgment day.

Answer To Q2 - Part Two B – Affairs Of Ummahs Of Earlier Prophets:

Religions of previous Prophets to begin with never took off. Just take Prophet Musa (alayhis salam) soon as he crossed the sea they worshipped the calf. When Prophet Musa said to them go and fight them and claim that land, they said, o Musa you and your God go and fight. Religion of Islam which Prophet Musa brought didn’t establish strongly. And its scripture was/is lost. What remains behind is extremely corrupted form with some teaching of Prophet Musa alayhis salam. Prophet Noah (alayhis salam) his entire Ummah went down with the flood. Two other Prophets, ones nation was destroyed by a fire tornado, and others nation had mountain toppled over it because they disobeyed. Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) nation, they not only refused to believe in his teaching they tried to kill him. Yes he did gain few followers, mentioned in Quran as Hawariyoon/supporters, but again his Islam was not accepted by people, and those who accepted were out muscled by Paul of Tarsus and other forgerers. Forgeries about Prophet Isa’s teaching were so wide spread that true followers of his religion … disappeared. Point I am making is religion of all formers Prophets never took off, their Ummahs never really accepted its teaching and their followers never became strong enough to establish religion on their hearts, minds, souls and bodies. Only success in establishing religion of Islam had was Prophet Sulayman and Prophet Dawud and what followed thereafter was rebellion/Kufr/Shirk Baal worship and etc and consquently they ended up in bondage/slavery at hands of Nebuchazaar. Any/Every religion of Islam which a previous Prophet brought disappeared with in a 100 year of their death. There was/is no enjoining good/forbidding evil. Their teaching of Tawheed, worship of Allah, all have disappeared for two main reasons. One they didn’t have huge following, two their teaching did not become solidly established in hearts, minds, souls and on bodies. Nor it became a solid self reviving self protecting institution. Why? Because before the people were tasked with protecting all aspects of teaching of their prophets and they eventually failed and result was that their religions got distorted and forgotten.

Answer To Q2 - Part Two C – Envoriment And Condition Of Bani Israeel:

Originally Prophets were sent as in father to son … generation after generation. Then this changed and Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) sent Prophets to Bani Israel at intervals. And then gap increased. Prophets either brought new revelation, or explained guarded revelation of a previous Prophet. This is how Bani Israeel were dealt with. Jews killed Prophets even before they could teach/preach to them. Others they imprisoned and tortured. With Jews spread of Islam was constant struggle, required constant micro-managing and direction. Sometimes things went south and they killed the Prophet because they didn’t like what he taught or didn’t agree with their i.e. Jewish nations world view. Jews as whole nation were happy when there needs were met and Prophet was teaching what they liked. And went Kufr whent they didn’t as consequence they would kill Prophets. You get the image. THE JEWS REQUIRED BABY-SITTING. They were rebellious people and to keep them upon Tawheed … it required constant maintaince. Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) decided enough is enough after they tried to kill Prophet Isa (alayhis salam). And chose a new people, Arabs, the most backward nation on earth at that time. They were so backward they didn’t even have a king/government. They still were tribal era where as nations around them had kings and emperors and Allah knows what else. They had one good quality they were a committed people. Whatever cause they committed to they committed to. I mean take , 300 year war, started between two tribes because a bird from orchard of one flew to anothers. And second got offended because bird hinted he was second best. So started 300 year war. Look at the dedication … to kill and get killed because of bird. Plus they were the most back-ward nation on earth. What better place to demonstrate what RELIGION of Allah can do for people if they accept and follow it sincerely. What better way to rubb it in the face of Jews then to transform a backward nation and make them reach pinnacle of education and englightenment. So Allah did. The Arabs fought, killed, got killed, but eventually came to Islam. ISLAM BECAME THEM AND THEY BECAME ISLAM. They took the NOOR of Islam and implanted that commitment and dedication and that knowledge and that love of Allah and His Messenger into hearts and minds of all those around them. And as far as Multan. Islam became the bright shinning star. Its teachings established, with solid roots on globe. And where as religion of former Prophets would get distorted and disppear in absence of a Prophet. The religion of Islam 1430 years and counting … it is strong and spreading. And here begins new chapter.

Answer To Q2 - Part Two D – Why Allah Stopped Sending Prophets:

(i) Prophets were needed to purify, to spread, their own versions of Islam, but religion of Islam is perfected and Mujadideen, Mujtahideen, scholars, and common Muslims like me are busy spreading it. Prophets were needed when a absence of a Prophet wuld mean there would be no one to purify it and no one to explain it to people. Ummah of RasoolAllah in all levels is promoting, teaching, protecting, sharing, and inviting non-Muslims to Islam. And this is why we are said to be best of Ummah, we enjoin good, we invite to good, and we prohibit evil/sin/kufr/shirk and we abstain from kufr/Shirk, and abstain from sin to best of our ability. Islam is alive, Islam is spreading, Muslims are promoting it, protecting it, and there is no need for a Prophet. When it has been perfected/completed wth Mujadids/revivers then what is need of a Prophet. When a Mujadid is doing what in previous nations prophets did then there is no need for new Prophet. And Mujadid is not something we have invented this is what Allahs Messenger told us. And He Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) does not speak religion except what Allah tells him to declare this is Islam. And he declared Mujadids will be born doing job of Prophets then what is need of Prophets. Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) replaced system of Prophet-hood with system of Mujadids.

(ii) Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) stopped Prophets as a mercy/rahma. He stopped sending more Prophets because some followers of previous Prophet, maybe most would not follow the new Prophet, and they would become Kafir. Jews killed prophets because their teachings went against teaching of previous Prophet and this is why they tried to kill Isa (alayhis salam). So it was act of mercy for us Muslims. And to prevent the Ummah dividing on fault like of Islam/Kufr. Take Mirzas claim of Prophet-hood as example. New one claims it, and guess what, we say you’re Kafir, Mirza is Kafir, and if Muslims got chance we would have killed him. Originally one Muslim Ummah now we fractured on line of Islam/Kufr. To prevent this divison of Kufr/Islam Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) stopped sending more Prophets. These are two main reasons I could think of.

(iii) Third is that Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) honoured Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) by stopping sending of more Prophets. Because any new Prophet would become centre of attention and pole of guidance and previous would be replaced. New ones teachings would become central and previous would loose position of authority. For us Muslims Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is authority as source of religion. For you Mirza has become this central figure. His teaching takes precedence over teaching of what Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) taught in Ahadith. Whatever Prophet said now is looked through pin hole of Mirza’s teaching. And I believe when Allah completed perfected religion of Islam on efforts of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa alaihi was’sallam). And saw struggle, suffering of believers and their Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) it was decided as matter of honouring him to not to send more Prophets. Ofcourse Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) knew this even before any of the events transpired so He decided to end Nabuwah on him to show that he has been honoured by Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) above all Prophets.

Question 3: (iii) “So the best Ummah is deprived of a blessing that God blessed an inferior Ummah (Bani Israel) with in abundance?”
Answer to Q3: The reason best of Ummah has not received a Nabi to guide them is preciously because they are, best of Ummah raised from mankind and they enjoin good and forbid evil as they were commanded which earlier Ummahs did not do. And thus they required constant baby-sitting and guidance and protection from misguidance.


Please be kind enough to disprove what I wrote. And it has to agree with Quran/Sunnah and common sense logic/rationalism that goes in line with what Quran/Sunnah teach.

Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen.
Muhammed Ali al-Qadiri, al-Razavi.
 
Last edited:
Muhammed Ali al-Qadiri, al-Razavi.

If Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم is chronologically the last Prophet, then how is it that the Messiah son of Maryam عليهما السلام , who is a Prophet of God, will descend in the latter days? How do you resolve this puzzle?
 
Everytime i hear the name Patel, it reminds me of Mubarek Patel, the Iranian terrorist who is in Pakistani custody.
India is a robust thriving democracy and people are free to say what's on their mind. Criticize the government, abuse the PM, question the highest court in the land, ridicule the way of life practiced by the majority, make fun of the gods. This very video you posted is proof of it.

Look for content by Ravish Kumar, Ashok Swain, Shehla Rashid, Umar Khalid, Swara Bhasker, Akash Banerjee, Dhruv Rathee etc.. there is no shortage of dissenters/anti Modi people here if you like this type of content.

Then there are the hindutva ideologues, Rajiv Malhotra, Pushpendra Kulshreshtra, Subramaniam Swamy etc, and goras Konerad Elst, David Frawley, Francois Gautier, Mitchel Danino.

You should look at their points of view as well to get a more balanced nuanced picture. It's kind of silly and self defeating to mindlessly bash India the way the overwhelming majority of Pakistanis seem to do on this forum.

Don't worry. You have your soft power safe unlike women in India.

As far as what Pakistanis do is considered, we cannot do anything else as we are financially weak and morally corrupt.
 
Last edited:

I am working on it. It is not being written on urgent basis, because you're not answering ques asked or even acknowleging you were wrong. Instead you just proceeded to new direction. And typically that is a sign person will not respond to anything and will continue to ask questions till cows fly. I will respond to your last post and after that if you do not respond to what i wrote in my previous post as it deserves to be responded to, then I will just leave you to it.
 
I am working on it. It is not being written on urgent basis, because you're not answering ques asked or even acknowleging you were wrong. Instead you just proceeded to new direction. And typically that is a sign person will not respond to anything and will continue to ask questions till cows fly. I will respond to your last post and after that if you do not respond to what i wrote in my previous post as it deserves to be responded to, then I will just leave you to it.

I shall respond to some of your points, but I advise you not to write such long winded answers. Let's have a dialogue
 
Wahi came to Prophets via Gibraeel n Mirza said angel Teechi Teechi comes to him delivering reports. Proof that he was lieing.

Is Archangel Gabriel عليه السلام the Angel of Revelation exclusively, or is it that other Angels can also bring revelation from Allah جل جلاله?

Maseeh Ibn Maryam was sent to Bani Israeel

If Masih Ibn Maryam عليهما السلام was sent to Israel how will he be sent for this Ummah in the latter days?

Yet Wahis gate has been closed and no prophet will recieve Wahi after last final prophet muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wassallam).

What is the proof that the gate of Wahi has been closed? Is there any Ayah in the Quran or a Hadith to that effect?

Hadith also says Jesus will perform Salah behind Imam Mahdi

Please quote this Hadith will full citation

If that is the case then 600 years between Prophet Isa and Prophet Muhammad there was no
Nabi/Rasool during that period did Nabuwah became curse?

First let me prove that Nubuwwah is a blessing from the Quran itself:

وَ اِذۡ قَالَ مُوۡسٰی لِقَوۡمِہٖ یٰقَوۡمِ اذۡکُرُوۡا نِعۡمَۃَ اللّٰہِ عَلَیۡکُمۡ اِذۡ جَعَلَ فِیۡکُمۡ اَنۡۢبِیَآءَ

And when Moses said to his people, ‘O my people, call to mind Allah’s favor upon you when He appointed Prophets among you' (Surah 5:20)

So the Quran describes the appointing of Prophets among Israel as a Ni'mah.

The period between the Messiah and Prophet Muhammad عليهما الصلوات والتسليمات is known as the Fatrah. Although there is a Hadith which says "there was no prophet between me and him" according to Surat Ya Sin (36:13-14) there were three Messengers of Allah sent to a town (Antioch). According to majority of the exegetes they were Messengers who came after the Messiah, being from his Ummah or from his disciples.

That should be sufficient for now.
 
Pakistan v India - who is better with minorities .. for education of the ignorant

 
Readers should note, my previous response will include more material and referrencee. and the following response, both would feature here:

Refuting Qadiyani, Prophet-Hood End Is Curse, And Descension At Odds With Khatamiyyah.

Click and save location, and share.

----------------------------------------

If Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم is chronologically the last Prophet, then how is it that the Messiah son of Maryam عليهما السلام , who is a Prophet of God, will descend in the latter days? How do you resolve this puzzle?

0.0 - Prophet Isa Return As Ummati And Belief Khatammiyyah Is Uneffected:

Questions
: “If Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is chronologically the last Prophet: (i) Then how is it that the Messiah son of Maryam who is a Prophet of God, will descend in the latter days? (ii) How do you resolve this puzzle?” Answer One: There is no, if, or but. He said la-Nabiya ba’di (i.e. there is no Prophet after me). And scholars said it means there will be no prophet newly commissioned to propogate a Shariah. And he said this without making any Takhsees/distinction. Meaning he did not say, there is no prophet after me except Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will be sent as a prophet to mankind with Wahi. Or there will be Ummati-prophet after me. Nothing whatsoever. As much I can recall there is not a single Hadith in which Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) EXPLICITLY used word prophet while informing us about return of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam). Meaning he did not even say, Prophet Isa Ibn Maryam (alayhis salam) would descend. In fact in such Ahadith he explicitly said, Isa Ibn Maryam (alayhis salam) will descend, here, here. In the following link you can see all Ahadith which mention descension of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) but none from it indicates Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said; Prophet Isa Ibn Maryam (alayhis salam) will descend amongst you, here. Absence of this title indicates Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) was making sure his words cannot be misconstrued to mean return of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) would be of a Prophet. There is no proof he would descend as a Nabi. He was/is a Nabi but his descension will be as an Ummati. We do not believe, and there is no proof, which Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will descend as a Nabi, and therefore our understanding of Khatamiyyah meaning last/final Prophet is not contradicting our belief. If you believe he will return as a Nabi you provide proof that his return will be of Nabi sent to last Ummah.

1.0 - Ascension And Descension Of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam):

Quran says:“And because of their saying (in boast): ‘We killed Messiah Jesus the son of Maryam, the Messenger of Allah.’ But they killed him not, nor crucified him, but it appeared so to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely, they killed him not but Allah raised him up unto Himself. And Allah is ever all-Powerful, all-Wise. [Ref: 4:157/158] The Jews tried to kill Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) like they had killed Prophets before him. And Jews in life time of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said in boast/arrogance that we killed Prophet Isa (alayhis salam). Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) responds to them saying it was made to appear that he was crucified and he died. And Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) in context of saying no death took place says but he was raised-up by Allah (i.e. bal-rafa’ullahu).

1.2 - Qadiyani Argument Based On Usage Of Rafa And Response:

Here Qadiyanis argue, word rafa (i.e. raised) in Quran is used in meaning of raised in maratib/maqam (degrees/stations) of honor and not raising of his body in literal sense. We say, rafa is jismani, because that is natural meaning of these two verses. Verse says; he was not killed, not crucified, it appeared so, they didn’t kill him, Allah raised him; logically the verse only gives meaning of being raised alive in body. If death had taken place then Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) would have said, they didn’t’ kill him, he died a natural death, and Allah raised him. Why force something on the verse which is not in the verse or hinted in the verse? Word rafa is used in meaning of physical raising of body because many Ahadith word rafa is used to mean raising of hands in beginning of Salah, during Ruku, and Sujud, and raising of hands in Dua, here. And in many verses of Quran word rafa has been used in meaning of raising something material high, example, in verse Q55:7, Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) said he raised the sky above earth. Raising of stations is also agree-able if we say rafa was used as a Zameer/hint toward rafa Darajaat, in light of following verse where raising of Darjaat is clearly stated in it: “Those Messengers! We preferred some of them to others; to some of them Allah spoke (directly); others He raised to degrees (of honour); and to Isa, the son of Maryam. We gave clear proofs and evidence, and supported him …” [Ref: 2:253] But natural meaning of verses, Q4:157/158, as quoted above is that he did not die and was raised without death. Even if we say the verse means, raising of Darjaat, question still remains Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) did not say he died after clearly negating his death. It is worth noting a minority from scholars of Islam have said natural death of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) did occur but he was not killed/murdered and was not crucified on cross. Majority holds to understanding he did not die and was raised alive/bodily. And we are instructed to follow majority: “It has been narrated on the authority of Ibn 'Abbas that the messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: One who found in his Amir something which he disliked should hold his patience, for one who separated from the main body of the Muslims even to the extent of a handspan and then he died would die the death of one belonging to the days of Jahiliyya.” [Ref: Muslim, B20, H4559] “Abu Dharr (Allah be pleased with him) reported from the Prophet (Peace be upon him) that,"Two are better than one, and three better than two; so stick to the Jama'ah for verily Allah, Most Great and Glorious, will only unite my nation on guidance." [Ref: Musnad Ahmad, Kitab Al-Ansar, Abu Zar Al Ghaffari, Hadith 20776] Anas bin Malik said: “I heard the Messenger of Allah say: ‘My nation will not unite on misguidance, so if you see them differing, follow the great majority.’” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H3950] No death of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) is belief and understanding of dominant group of Muslims. And this is the truth which we are instructed fo adhere to by Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam).

1.3 - Proving Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) Is Alive And Will Return Therefore:

Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) said Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will return as a sign of judgment day to come in following verse: He ( Prophet Isa alayhis salam) is a Sign of the Hour. Have no doubt about it. But follow me. This is a straight path.” [Ref: 43:61] If he died a natural death as Qadiyanis believe this means when he returns he will be son of another mother/father and will die again and will be burried next to grave of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). That is two births and two deaths. And this is not allowed everyone has one chance to live and die. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said none from paradise will want to return except martyrs: “Narrated Anas bin Malik: The Prophet said: ‘Nobody who enters Paradise likes to go back to the world even if he got everything on the earth, except a Mujahid who wishes to return to the world so that he may be martyred ten times because of the dignity he receives (from Allah).’" [Ref: Bukhari, B52, H72, here.] And he said Prophets are in paradise: “Narrated Hasana daughter of Mu'awiyah: She reported on the authority of her paternal uncle: I asked the Prophet: Who are in Paradise? He replied: Prophets are in Paradise, martyrs are in Paradise, infants are in Paradise and children buried alive are in Paradise.” [Ref: Abu Dawud, B14, H2515, here.] If Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) had died he would not have returned. His returning is proof that he has not died and the rafa/raising mentioned in the verse is bodily ascension. And Ahadith talk about bodily descension of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam): “Certainly, the time of prayer shall come and then Jesus (peace be upon him) son of Mary would descend and would lead them. When the enemy of Allah would see him, it would (disappear) just as the salt dissolves itself in water and …” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6924, here.]

1.4 - Why Descension Of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam):

(i) Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) said: “Every soul will taste death. Then to Us will you be returned.” [Ref: 29:57] His ascension was to save him from humiliation and help cause of Islam by sending him as an Ummati of RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). (ii) His descension is for promotion of perfected/completed Islam of last/final Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) as mentioned in following Hadith: “Narrated Abu Hurayrah: The Prophet said: There is no prophet between me and him, that is, Jesus. He will descent (to the earth). When you see him, recognise him: a man of medium height, reddish fair, wearing two light yellow garments, looking as if drops were falling down from his head though it will not be wet. He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross, kill swine, and abolish Jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except Islam. He will destroy the Antichrist and will live on the earth for forty years and then he will die. The Muslims will pray over him.” [Ref: Abu Dawood, B38, H4310, here.] His return is to help the cause of Islam because through his Jihad, preaching, struggle, and support of Muslims, Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) will bring end to all religions. Like I said he is helping the cause of Islam. If he was helping cause Islam by inviting to his own Shariah that would be like me helping your shop by taking your customers to my shop. That would hardly be helping the cause of Islam. Qadiyani can say since religion of all Prophets was Islam therefore return of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) and Islam dominating could be referrence to his version of Islam (i.e Shariah). We say Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) said: "It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth, to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikoon hate it." [Ref: 9:33] Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) said Islam will be championed by Him and this he said in context of teaching of last/final Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) therefore domination of Islam mentioned in Hadith is fullfilment of the verse. And eradication of all religions will be result of and due to spread of last perfected version of Islam. (iii) Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) instructed to fight the disbelievers until there is no more Zulm: “And fight against them until there is no more zulm (transgression) and all Deen belongs to Allah alone.” [Ref: 8:39] Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) stated that Luqman (alayhis salam) said to his son Shirk is a great Zulm (i.e. oppression/transgression) in following Ayah: "O my son! Do not commit Shirk with Allah. Verily Shirk is a tremendous Zulm (transgression)." [Ref: 31:13] And Shirk being a Zulm has support from following Hadith, here. In conclusion we the Muslims are instructed to fight/Jihad against Mushirkeen until there is no more Shirk. And Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) as a Muslim will fight as an Ummati until all religions are eradicated and Shirk completely disappears. (iv) He will then abolish Jaziyah because Jaziyah is a tax levied on non-Muslims living in Khilafat. These words can also mean that Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will abolish Jaziyah in the beginning of his milltary compaign. And therefore make rule that you accept Islam, or you die. In other words he will offer no choice of paying Jaziyah and living under Islamic rule as a non-Muslim Dhimmi (i.e. conquered) people. Some scholars have taken this position and it is position of a minority. This interpretation is problematic for two reasons: (a) It seems Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) indicated a chronological in which things will unfold. (b) Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) said: "There shall be no compulsion in (acceptance of) the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut ..." [Ref: 2:256] In this light second interpretation is invalid and rejected. My understanding is Muslim armies will conquer lands and providing free access and people of conqered lands will get to see true Islam and true Muslims as opposed to what they saw in Media and they will accept Islam. And maybe Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will perform Karamat/Mojazaat to convince people of truth of Islam. Bottom line is he will work to end Shirk in line with Quranic teaching and this is proof that he will be Ummati of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). And he will end Jaziyah after domination of Islam because there will no longer be need for it. The Kafirs/Mushriks living in lands of Islam all will convert to Islam and thus there would be no need to pay Jaziyah. And Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will then cancel Jaziyah contracts made with former Dhimmis. This is also proof he will be a Ummati and under Shariah of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam).

2.0 - He Was Sent To Bani Israeel As a Prophet To Guide Them:

Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) narrates regarding Prophet Isa (alayhis salam): “And He will teach him the Book and Al-Hikmah (and) the Taurat and the Injeel. And will make him a Messenger to the Children of Israel (saying): ‘I have come to you with a sign from your Lord, that I design for you out of clay, a figure like that of a bird, and breathe into it, and it becomes a bird by Allah's Leave; and I …” [Ref: 3:48/49] And (remember) when Isa, son of Maryam said: ‘O Children of Israel! I am the Messenger of Allah unto you, confirming the Taurat before me, and giving glad tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad.’ But when he came to them with clear proofs, they said: ‘This is plain magic.’" [Ref:66:6] Quran makes it very clear that Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) was sent to Bani Israeel with Taurat and understanding of it, and a scripture called Injeel.

2.1 - Prophet Muhammad Was Sent To Entire Mankind:

Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) has been sent to entire mankind according to following verses: And We have not sent you except as a giver of glad tidings and a warner to all mankind, but most men know not.” [Ref: 34:28] “Say: ‘O mankind! Verily, I am sent to you all as the Messenger of Allah (from) to Whom belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth.’" [Ref: 7:158] Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said he has been sent to entire mankind where as Nabis before him were sent to just one group of people: “The Messenger of Allah said: … I have been given the intercession which was not given to any Prophet before me; and I have been sent to all of mankind whereas the Prophets before me were sent to their own people.’" [Ref: Nisai, B4, H432, here.] It means Nabis were exclusive to Ummah which the Nabi belonged to. Prophets of Bani Israeel were exclusively for them because they belonged to them. Yet our Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is an Arab and from Banu Quraysh tribe yet he is sent to all races/nations and tribes in mankind. In another Hadith he said the same but added he is last Prophet in line of Prophets: “… the Messenger of Allah said: … spoils have been made lawful to me: the earth has been made for me clean and a place of worship; I have been sent to all mankind and the line of prophets is closed with me.” [Ref: Muslim, B4, H1062, here.]

2.2 – Contradiction In Quran From Qadiyani Belief And Resolution:

IF we believe Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will return as a Nabi with Wahi like he did before Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) then it his prophet-hood can only be limited to Bani Israeel. And this is because he was sent to them as a Prophet with Wahi/Injeel and Hikmah (i.e. wisdom). He was not sent to mankind with Wahi/Injeel. In contrast according to text of Quran/Sunnah Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) was/is sent to entire mankind. His Prophet-hood is inclusive of all people, all races, all nations, and all Ummahs, including Bani Israeel. How can all encampassing prophet-hood be replaced with prophet-hood of a Nabi who was sent to a particular Ummah. If Qadiyani belief is true that Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will return as a Nabi then it means he will act as a Nabi of entire mankind. And this goes clearly against what Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) taught in Quran because he was sent to Bani Israeel. In context of Qadiyani belief it will boil down to a Nabi over-stepping boundary set by Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). And Prophets of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) only say and do as instructed by Him and do not assign for themselves tasks which weren’t His directives. He would not only be over-stepping the set boundary but also unjustly become partner in Wahi/Quran of Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). And this is something he was not tasked as a Nabi as evidenced by verses quoted above. Only way he would not over-step boundary set by Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and not be a Nabi partner in Quran is; if he was Ummati of last final Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). Indeed he is and evidence will follow in the sections 3.0 on wards.

2.3 – Qadiyani Objections New Prophets Explained Scriptures Of Previous Prophets:

Qadiyani could argue earlier Prophets explained scriptures of Prophets that were before them. And we say, Sunnah of Prophets and objective of their scriptures is that they expose corruption in previous scriptures and explain the truth about them in their new scripture. Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) was sent to Bani Israeel to expose corruption of and to explain Taurat and to bring them new scripture, Injeel. He was sent to do this very job as evidenced by the verse: And He will teach him the Book and Al-Hikmah (and) the Taurat and the Injeel. And will make him a Messenger to the Children of Israel (saying): ‘I have come to you with a sign from your Lord, that I design for you out of clay, a figure like that of a bird, and breathe into it, and it becomes a bird by Allah's Leave; and I …” [Ref: 3:48/49] There is no proof in Quran/Sunnah which indicates he was or will be commissioned as a Nabi upon his return and will be tasked to do explain Quran as a Nabi. In light of all evidence in support of Islamic understanding and in absence contradicting proof; it is natural to conclude he will/can only return as an Ummati of Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam).

3.0 – Covenant Of Prophets To Be Ummatis Of Last Prophet Upon His Commission:

Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) took oath from Prophets that when Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) comes they would believe in his prophet-hood and aid him and they all said we will including Prophet Isa (alayhis salam): "And (remember) when Allah took the covenant of the Prophets saying: ‘Take whatever I gave you from the Book and Hikmah/wisdom and afterwards there will come to you a Messenger confirming what is with you. You (prophets) must, then, believe in him and help him.' Allah said: 'Do you agree (to it) and will you take up My Covenant?' They said: 'We agree.' He said: 'Then bear witness and I am with you among the witnesses (for this).'" [Ref: 3:81] When this is undeniable truth then how can Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) return as a Nabi. And how can he be sent as a Nabi to Ummah of RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) when he himself is Ummati of RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam).

3.1 – Evidence Establishes Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) Will Be Ummati:

And proof of this is that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) lead all the Prophets in prayers in Masjid al-Aqsa. Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will perform Salah behind Imam al-Mahdi: “He said: 'On that day they will be few, and most of them will be in Baitul-Maqdis (Jerusalem), and their leader will be a righteous man. When their leader has stepped forward to lead them in Subh/Fajr prayer, 'Isa bin Maryam will come down to them. Their leader will step backwards so that Isa can come forward and lead the people in prayer, but Isa will place his hand between his shoulders and say to him: ‘Go forward and pray, for the Iqamah was given for you.’ Then their leader will lead them in prayer. When he has finished, Isa will say: ‘Open the gate.’ So they will ...” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H4077, here.] Note this Hadith is Daif/Weak but other authentic Ahadith establish the same point. What this proves is that will be a follower of Shariah of last/final Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam).

3.2 – Qadiyani Counter Argument Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) Will Lead Prayers:

A Qadiyani once argued according to more authentic Hadith in Sahih of Imam Muslim Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will lead the Muslims in Prayers: “And when they would come to Syria, he would come out while they would be still preparing themselves for battle drawing up the ranks. Certainly, the time of prayer shall come and then Jesus (peace be upon him) son of Mary would descend and would lead them. When the enemy of Allah would see him, it would (disappear) just as the salt dissolves itself in water and …” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6924, here.] And he argued this proves he will not be an Ummati but returning as a Nabi. It was pointed out to him, that the Hadith does not say Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will lead them in Salah. Hadith says he would lead Imam al-Mahdi and Muslim army in battle against Dajjal his Zionist army.

3.3 - No Evidence In Quran/Sunnah Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) Will Return As Nabi:

No where in Quran/Hadith it is stated Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will be sent as a Prophet to us, or he will receive Wahi upon his return, and via which he will guide us. It makes no sense that he will return as a Prophet who has believed in Prophet-hood of Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). And as help to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) he invites toward a new Shariah, or his own religion. That is like saying, I am helping your buisiness by taking your customers to my own shop. Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will be an Ummati of Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). And as an Ummati he will be help to cause of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and to spread/promote religion of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) as he promised in world of souls: “’Take whatever I gave you from the Book and Hikmah/wisdom and afterwards there will come to you a Messenger confirming what is with you. You (prophets) must, then, believe in him and help him.' Allah said: 'Do you agree (to it) and will you take up My Covenant?' They said: 'We agree.' He said: …" [Ref: 3:81]

3.4 – Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) Nabi Of Bani Israeel And Ummati:

Here the Qadiyanis typically say, how come Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will return as an Ummati and is still a Prophet, being Ummati is in contradiction with being a Prophet. We say, he will return as an Ummati of last/final Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) but his status of Prophet is not revoked. Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) remains a Prophet even after his Shariah has been replaced by Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). Now he is bound by duty and agreement mentioned in verse, “You (prophets) must, then, believe in him and help him.' … They said: 'We agree.' Allah said ..”, to believe and follow Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and aid him in spread of his last, perfect version of Islam. And just as in world of souls Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) took oath from Prophets, and he referred to them as Prophets, and they were Prophets without Wahi-Kitabi, and without an Ummah, in the same way Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) can be a Prophet without receiving any Wahi and without being sent to an Ummah to guide. Only distinction that needs to be made is that he is not as a Prophet sent to this last/final Ummah, he was a Prophet sent to Bani Israeel, and he is Prophet of Bani Israeel and an Ummati of last final Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam).

3.5 – As Believer Of And Helper He Invite Jews To Perfected Islam:

His return is so that he can convince Bani Israeel (i.e. the Jews) to believe in him as they should have believed him when he was sent to them. And in light of Quranic teaching to set record straight about his elevation to status of God-hood and Lord-ship. Upon his return/descension the Jews will believe in him as whole nation: “There is not one of the People of the Book who will not believe in him ('Isa) before he dies; and on the Day of Rising he will be a witness against them.” [Ref: 4:159] With regards to Christianity, he will break cross, this could mean he will literally break a cross associated with his alleged death (i.e. true cross non-sense). It could mean he will dismantle Christianity and its teaching of crufixion and death of Jesus being an attonement for mankind. With regards to Jews who do not believe in him will die in wars. The killed/dead will be soilders of Jewish Zionist state of Israel. Hadith which records saying, even stones will speak and tell the army of Imam al-Mahdi and Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) a Jew is hiding behind me is about Israeli Zionist army: “Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Messenger said: ‘The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say: ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.’’ [Ref: Bukhari, B52, H177, here.] Even though Ahadith make no Takhsees/distinction between Jews; Islamicly killing civilians, destroying civilian infrastructure, crops, water sources, is all prohibited, as evidenced by Ahadith. Hence army of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) will not target Jews residing in Israeel but those fighting defending this Jewish Nazi state will certainly meet their end in this final battle. Returning to main subject. Jews will come to believe in him in light of Quranic teaching: He was sent to them as a Messenger of Allah, Ruh-ullah, Maseeh-ullah, his miraclous birth, affirm righteousness of his mother, they did not kill him, and nor crucified him, but he was raised alive etc. In addition he will inform Jews/Christians that Prophet which he prophecised is the last/final Prophet Muhammad. And such people will earn double reward: “Narrated Abu Burda's father: The Prophet said: ‘Three persons will get double reward. (One is) a person … marries her. Such a person will get a double reward. (Another is) a believer from the people of the scriptures who has been a true believer and then he believes in the Prophet (Muhammad). Such a person will get a double reward. (The third is) a slave who observes ...’" [Ref: Bukhari, B52, H255, here.] Logically he cannot call toward a new religion or his own version of Islam with which he was sent before his ascension. He can only invite people to Shariah and beliefs/teachings of Quran. And this is what an Ummati, I, you the Muslims, all do, and this is precisely what he will invite to as an Ummati. Therefore he will not be sent as a Nabi but he will return as an Ummati of last/final Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam).

3.6 – Conclusion - Bani Israeel Ummah Of Last Prophet And Return As An Ummati:

Question One
: “If Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is chronologically the last Prophet: (i) Then how is it that the Messiah son of Maryam who is a Prophet of God, will descend in the latter days?” Answer One: He will not return as a Prophet of Bani Israeel because Bani Israeel was formerly his Ummah. All Bani Israeel from his own anouncement of prophet-hood to beginning of Prophet Muhammad’s (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) prophet-hood were Ummah of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam). Believers and disbelievers of Bani Israeel were his Ummah. Bani Israeel became Ummah from beginning of prophet-hood of Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and will remain so till judgment day. This includes those who believed as Muslims/Momins and those who remained upon misguidance/Kufr of old. This is because Ummah of RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is of two types; (i) to whom he was sent - this is entire mankind, (ii) and those who accepted him as their Nabi from mankind – these are Muslims. Those Jews who believed in his prophet-hood and affirmed, la ilaha il-Allah, Muhammadur rasoolAllah, they became part of Muslim-Ummah. And those who for whatever reason could not accept Islam they are part of sent-to-Ummah. All nations, races, castes, tribes, families, and any other conceivable division; Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is sent to them, including Bani Israeel: “And let there arise from you a group inviting to all that is good, enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong, and those will be successful." [Ref: 3:104] And therefore Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) cannot and will not be returning as a Nabi of Bani Israeel. His role as an active-Nabi came to end upon his ascension and time granted to Bani Israeel to believe believe him as Nabi came to end when Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) anounced his Nabuwah. His return can only be as an Ummati.

4.0 - Last And Final Prophet – After Prophet Muhammad There Is No New Prophet:

(i) There is no if or but in regards to Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) being last and end of Prophets. Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) said: Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the last (end) of the Prophets. And Allah is Ever All-Aware of everything. [Ref: 33:40] The all important word in phrase Khatm al-Nabiyeen is Khatm and it is read with Zabr and Zer on t/ta (i.e. Khatim, Khatam). Khatim means last/final. Khatam has many meanings including signet and seal (i.e. to tightly close). Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) explained the Shari meaning of Khatam al-Nabiyeen in various Ahadith. (ii) He said I am Khatam al-Nabiyeen in following Hadith and followed it by saying there is no prophet after me to make it clear that Khatam is in meaning of seal (i.e. to tightly close/shut): “… the Messenger of Allah said: ‘The Hour shall not ... And indeed there shall be thirty imposters in my Ummah,each of them claiming that he is a Prophet. And I am the last of the Prophets, there is no Prophet after me.’" [Ref: Tirmadhi, B7, H2219, here.] (iii) Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said his example is of a missing piece effecting completion of otherwise beautifully built house: “Abu Hurairh reported Allah's Messenger as saying: The similitude of mine and that of the Apostles before me is that of a person who built a house quite imposing and beautiful, but for one brick in one of its corners.” He continues and goes on to say he is that missing piece and I am the last of Prophet (i.e. wa ana Khatam al-Nabiyeen): “People would go round it, appreciating the building, but saying: Why has the brick not been fixed here? He said: I am that brick and I am the last of the prophets.” [Ref: Muslim, B30, H5675, here.] (iv) Bani Israeel were lead by one prophet replacing another. And this tradition of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) could have caused some to postulate just as Bani Israeel were guided by consecutive chain of prophets so there would be a continous chain of prophets amongst Arabs like Bani Israeel. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) in this regard said Bani Israeel were led by prophets, one replaced by another, but there is no Prophet after me: “… The Prophet said: ‘The Israelis used to be ruled and guided by prophets: Whenever a prophet died, another would take over his place. There will be no prophet after me, but there will be Caliphs who will increase in number.’ The people asked: ‘O Allah's Messenger! What do you order us (to do)?’ He said: ‘Obey the one who will be given the pledge of allegiance first. Fulfil ..." [Ref: Bukhari, B55, H661, here.] Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) drew our attention to context of Bani Israeel being sent one prophet another. Why did Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) frame the statement of there is no prophet after me, in context of Bani Israeel? Prophets of Bani Israeel were acting many roles and carrying out many duties. And to let us know, no prophet whatsoever type of duty/role, would be sent after him Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) framed, there is no prophet after me, in context of Bani Israeel being guided by consecutive prophets. (v) In another Hadith Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said Ali (radiallah ta’ala anhu) is guardian of believers in his absences as Prophet Haroon (alayhis salam) was guardian of Bani Israeel in absence of Prophet Musa (alayhis salam). He then said but there is one distinction that there is no Prophet after me: Narrated Sa`d: Allah's Messenger set out for Tabuk. appointing Ali as his deputy (in Medina). `Ali said: ‘Do you want to leave me with the children and women?’ The Prophet said: ‘Will you not be pleased that you will be to me like Aaron to Moses? But there will be no prophet after me." [Ref: Bukhari, B59, H700, here.] This Hadith indicates Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) knew Ali (radiallah ta’ala anhu) would out-live him therefore Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said there is no Prophet after me. Tashbih/comparison is always in relation to a single component/quality there was possibility prophetic saying being misconstrued so Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said, there is no prophet after me. (vi) In following Hadith Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said I am al-Aqib: “… Allah's Messenger said: ‘I have five names: I am Muhammad and Ahmad; I am Al-Mahi through whom Allah will eliminate infidelity; I am Al-Hashir who will be the first to be resurrected, the people being resurrected there after; and I am also Al-Aqib (i.e.the end, the last).’” [Ref: Bukhari, B56, H732, here.] In many verses of Quran derivatives of Aqb are linguistically employed to mean end and last. Meaning of al-Aqib in Shari sense is given in following Hadith: “This hadith has been transmitted on the authority of Ma'mar (and the words are): I said to Zuhri: What does (the word) al-Aqib imply? He said: One after whom there is no Prophet. And in the hadith transmitted on the authority of Ma'mar and Uqail there is a slight variation of wording.” [Ref: Muslim, B30, H5812, here.] (vii) Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is reported to have said there is no prophet, nor a messenger after him, because prophet-hood has come to end. Only thing that continues which has a flicker of prophet-hood are true dreams: “Anas bin Malik narrated: The Messenger of Allah said: 'Indeed Messenger-ship and Prophethood have been terminated, so there shall be no Messenger after me, nor a Prophet.' He (Anas) said: ‘The people were concerned about that, so he said: 'But there will be Mubash-shirat.' So they said: 'O Messenger of Allah, what is Mubashshirat?' He said: 'The Muslim's dreams, for it is a portion of the portions of Prophethood.'" [Ref: Tirmadhi, B8, H2272, here.] This Hadith absolutely makes it clear nothing of prophet-hood remains. Sending of Wahi to prophets has come to end and prophets being sent to nations has come to end. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) was/is last Prophet and the final Messenger and after him there is no prophet, or messenger. If there was ever chance of a sub-ordinate prophet being sent after Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) he would have said, there are no Prophets/Messengers after me; except sub-ordinate Prophets/Messengers; or except Prophet/Prophets stamp approved by me. He made no such distinction. Why? Because Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) wasn’t sending any such prophet. He also said, mother of Risalah (i.e. messenger-ship) and Nabuwah (i.e. prophet-ship) has ceased, except true dreams. Wahi is foundation of both of these and Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) put an end to it. There can be no Nabi/Rasool without Wahi. If there was a Nabi being sent, or more then one, Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) would not have said door of Wahi is closed with me. And only thing of Nabuwah, Risalah, Wahi that can be received is true-dreams which are 1/40th of Wahi: “Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah's Messenger said: ‘A good dream (that comes true) of a righteous man is one of forty-six parts of prophetism.’" [Ref: Bukhari, B87, H112, here.] One forty’th, that’s all of Wahi one can access in form of a true dream after Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and nothing more. Note Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said messenger-ship and prophet-hood has ceased and I interpreted that to mean Wahi has ceased. Companions of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) understood his statement to mean Wahi has ceased: “… (this worldly life). She said: I weep not because I am ignorant of the fact that what is in store for Allah's Messenger (in the next world) is better than (this world), but I weep because the revelation which came from the Heaven has ceased to come. This moved both of them to tears and they began to weep along with her.” [Ref: Muslim, B31, H6009, here.] “… People were (sometimes) judged by the revealing of a divine inspiration during the lifetime of Allah's Apostle but now there is no longer any more (new revelation). Now we judge you by the deeds you practice publicly, so we will trust and favor the one who does good deeds in front of us, and we will not call him to account about what he is really doing in secret, for Allah will judge him for that; ...” [Ref: Bukhari, B48, H809, here.] There can be no prophet/messenger without Wahi. And anywho claims Wahi after Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is a liar and an impostor (i.e. minor Dajjal).

5.0 - Hadith Of Dajjal Claiming To Be A Prophet And Lord:

Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) while describing Dajjal said: O slaves of Allah, remain steadfast. I will describe him to you in a manner in which none of the Prophets has described him before me. He will start by saying: ‘I am a Prophet.’And there is no Prophet after me. Then a second time he will say: ‘I am your Lord.But you will not see your Lord until you die. He is one-eyed, and your Lord is not one-eyed. And written between his eyes is Kafir.” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H4077, here.] Casual readers of this Hadith may not be able to understand much from literal reading of this Hadith but when this Hadith is contextualized with other Ahadith then it reveals great details. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) chose his words very carefully. Ahadith reveal he will claim to be a Prophet impersonate al-Maseeh. Yet the Hadith doesn’t explicitly state if Dajjal will claim to be a new Prophet/al-Maseeh, nor does Hadith indicate Dajjal will claim to be a former Prophet/al-Maseeh whom as returned. And I believe this is to convey a wider meaning. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: “I heard Allah's Messenger saying: "I have been sent with Jawami al-Kalim … Muhammad said Jawami al-Kalim means that Allah expresses in one or two statements or thereabouts the numerous matters that used to be written in the books revealed before (the coming of) the Prophet.” [Ref: Bukhari, B87, H141, here.] This Hadith is perfect demonstration of comprehensiveness of prophetic words.

5.1 – Dajjal Will Claim To Be Al-Maseeh:

(i) Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: “Narrated Abu Huraira: ‘Allah's Messenger said: ‘Neither Messiah nor plague will enter Medina.’” [Ref: Bukhari, B71, H627, here.] al-Maseeh mentioned in the Hadith is not Prophet Isa Ibn Maryam (radiallah ta’ala anhu) it is Dajjal: “Narrated Abu Bakra: The Prophet said: ‘The terror caused by Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal will not enter Medina and at that time Medina will have seven gates and there will be two angels at each gate (guarding them).’” [Ref: Bukhari, B88, H240, here.] In Jami at-Tirmadhi Abdullah Ibn Salam (radiallah ta’ala anhu) is reported to have said Prophet Isa Ibn Maryam (alayhis salam) will be burried next to grave of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) in Madinah: “Narrated 'Abdullah bin Salam: ‘The description of Muhammad is written in the Tawrah (and the description that) 'Eisa will be buried next to him.’ (One of the narrators) Abu Mawdud said: ‘(And) there is a place for a grave left in the house.’" [Ref: Tirmadhi, B46, H3617, here.] These Ahadith establish Dajjal will be called al-Maseeh. And implications of this is in the beginning Dajjal will claim to be al-Maseeh which the Jews are waiting for.

5.2 – Dajjal Will Claim To Be Prophet Isa Ibn Maryam (alayhis salam):

(ii) Question arises why did Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) used words al-Maseeh ad-Dajjal for Dajjal? Word Dajjal is derived from Djl which means to decieve and to falsify. In this light Dajjal means deciever, impostor, charlatan etc. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) employed words al-Maseeh ad-Dajjal for Dajjal to indicate he will be an impostor Christ/al-Maseeh. He will be impersonating someone he is not. And in light of Islamic teaching Dajjal will claim to be Prophet al-Maseeh Isa Ibn Maryam (alayhis salam). To score his point he would seemingly will perform iconic miracle of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) – the giving of life to dead. And will say to people if I kill and restore his life will you then accept I am the al-Maseeh [Isa Ibn Maryam] whom you been waiting for: “He will land in some of the salty barren areas (outside) Medina; on that day the best man or one of the best men will come up to him and say: 'I testify that you are the same Dajjal whose description was given to us by Allah's Messenger.' Ad-Dajjal will say to the people: 'If I kill this man and bring him back to life again, will you doubt my claim?' They will say: 'No.' Then Ad-Dajjal will kill that man and bring him back to life. That man will say: 'Now I know your reality better than before.' Ad-Dajjal will say: 'I want to kill him but I cannot.' " [Ref: Bukhari, B30, H106, here.] Another Hadith says the man who will expose reality of Dajjal to people of Arabia will be Prophet Khadir (alayhis salam); mentioned in Quran due to his interaction with Prophet Musa (alayhis salam): “The Dajjal would then make an attempt to kill him (again) but he would not be able to do that. Abu Ishaq reported that it was said: That person would be Khadir.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H7017, here.]

5.3 – Dajjal Will Claim To Be al-Maseeh Jesus Son Of God, And Then God:

(iii) Much like Muslims Christians are also waiting for Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) to descend. In order to win Christians over to his side. And for them to believe him Dajjal will claim to be Christ (i.e. al-Maseeh) of Christians. Then to sweeten the deal for them Dajjal will take the logical step and claim to be God/Lord: “Then a second time he will say: ‘I am your Lord.’ But you will not see your Lord until you die. He is one-eyed, and your Lord is not one-eyed, and written between his eyes is Kafir.” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H4077, here.] Note Dajjals ‘supernatural’ actions would give credence to his claim in of being al-Maseeh and Lord/God and provide justification for Jews/Christians and maybe illiterate Muslims to accept his claim.

5.4 – Why Would Jews Follow A Claimant Of God-Hood:

(iv) Someone may argue why would Jews follow a man who would claim to be Lord/God when it goes against their teachings of monotheism? Answer is that there is no indication all Jews would follow him. Hadith record’s seventy thousand Jews from Isfahan would follow him: “Anas b. Malik reported that Allah's Messenger said: The Dajjal would be followed by seventy thousand Jews of Isfahan wearing shawls.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H7034, here.] It is quite possible these followers could be first wave of Jewish followers from Isfahan and he might gain more following on his arrival to Israel. All fallow him or seventy thousand fallow him it is irrelevent. Dajjal’s claim of Lordship/Godhood does not go against teaching of Judaism and their Bible. In Christian Bible, John 10:34, Jesus allegedly said to Jews that you accuse me of claiming to be god but your Bible says, you’re gods and children of God most High. And this is refference to Psalm 82:6 and John 10:34 exactly replicates it. In Exodus 7:1 Prophet Musa (alayhis salam) is said to be a God to Pharaoh and Prophet Haroon (alayhis salam) is said to be a Prophet. Thus my understanding is that these Jews would be extremely literate about their Old Bible. Their literacy and dedication is illustrated by their usage of Shawls. These Shawls are worn by Jews who are dedicated to study and practice of Judaism. Therefore they would be able to reconcile his claim of Lordship with their scripture without compromising their understanding of monotheism. It is worth noting Dajjal will be lieing/decieving to Jews as well. Therefore he will likely concoct a explanation justifying his claim to his Jewish followers. Dajjal’s reality would be no more then of a flamboyant Jewish Tele-Evangalist type Rabbi – with moto ends justify the means. However the cookie crumbles he would move with his followers from Isfahan/Iran to present state of Israel. His arrival on the scene would lead to a major war between Muslims and state of Israel. This war would end in destruction of destruction of Israel. (v) In conclusion it needs to be said Dajjal will claim to be al-Maseeh of Jews, Christians, and Muslims. And to do this he will juggle three different al-Maseeh roles. Al-Maseeh as a new Prophet. Al-Maseeh Jesus the son of God and Lord of Lords returning again. Al-Maseeh as a Prophet Isa Ibn Maryam (alayhis salam) descending again to fulfill what is foretold in Quran/Hadith. Dajjal being impostor, a charlatan will fool, Jews, Christians, and tiny minority of Muslims.

5.5 – Understanding No Prophet After Me In Relationship To Three Religions:

(i) Observant readers would be asking: what does the previous A4 page had to do with Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) being last and final Prophet? The previous section was foundation to explain following Hadith: “O slaves of Allah, remain steadfast. I will describe him to you in a manner in which none of the Prophets has described him before me. He will start by saying: ‘I am a Prophet.’And there is no Prophet after me. Then a second time he will say: ‘I am your Lord.But you will not see your Lord until you die. He is one-eyed, and your Lord is not one-eyed. And written between his eyes is Kafir.” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H4077, here.] Dajjal will claim to be al-Maseeh and a Prophet of Jews. Jews believe their al-Maseeh will and is always a Prophet. Jews also rejected Prophet-hood of Prophet Isa (alayhis salam). Therefore when Dajjal will claim to be al-Maseeh of Jews he will be claiming to be a [new] Prophet. From Islamic point of view Prophet-hood has ended. And to refute his claim of being a [new] Prophet Allah’s Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: “He will start by saying: ’I am a Prophet. And there is no Prophet after me.’” (ii) We the Muslims are waiting for Prophet Isa Ibn Maryam (alayhis salam) to return as a Ummati of last/final prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). Dajjal will also claim to be a Prophet and Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) added that there is no Prophet after me: He will start by saying: ‘I am a Prophet.’And there is no Prophet after me. Then a second time he will say: ‘I am your Lord.But you will not see your Lord until you die. He is one-eyed, and your Lord is not one-eyed. And written between his eyes is Kafir.” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H4077, here.] This establishes that Dajjal will claim to be a Prophet. But not any Prophet; Dajjal, the impostor, the charlatan will falsely claim to be Isa Ibn Maryam (alayhis salam), and on back of this Dajjal will claim he is a Prophet. To shut this door, Dajjal claiming to be Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) the last Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said, there is no Prophet after me. When Dajjal claims to be al-Maseeh and on back of this says I am Prophet whom you’re waiting for; we will know he is Dajjal because Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said there is no Prophet after me. (iii) Christians believe him to be part of God, part of Trinity as the Son of God. They also believe him to be a prophet. To be precise the Son of God acting as a prophet. They apply Biblical passages, Deutronomy 18:18, upon him in order to prove he was prophecised by Prophets of old. Also Christian Bible in book of Acts 3:22/23 indicates his followers believe him to be a Prophet. In regards to their belief; Jesus a Prophet and the son of God, Lord of Lords; and Dajjals claim of being Prophet al-Maseeh and Lord; Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa’sallam) said: He will start by saying: ‘I am a Prophet.’And there is no Prophet after me. Then a second time he will say: ‘I am your Lord.But you will not see your Lord until you die. He is one-eyed, and your Lord is not one-eyed. And written between his eyes is Kafir.” [Ref: Ibn Majah, B36, H4077, here.]

5.6 – Mirza And His Claim Of al-Maseeh And Prophet-hood:

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani claimed to be Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) and said as a Prophet he recieves Wahi, here. Scribd image can be seen, here. Mirza’s claim of Wahi goes against following Ahadith which explicitly indicate revelation has ceased after Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam): “… (this worldly life). She said: I weep not because I am ignorant of the fact that what is in store for Allah's Messenger (in the next world) is better than (this world), but I weep because the revelation which came from the Heaven has ceased to come. This moved both of them to tears and they began to weep along with her.” [Ref: Muslim, B31, H6009, here.] “… People were (sometimes) judged by the revealing of a divine inspiration during the lifetime of Allah's Apostle but now there is no longer any more (new revelation). Now we judge you by the deeds you practice publicly, so we will trust and favor the one who does good deeds in front of us, and we will not call him to account about what he is really doing in secret, for Allah will judge him for that; ...” [Ref: Bukhari, B48, H809, here.] Why revelation has ceased? Prophet recieves Wahi that’s why Mirza claimed to be a Prophet. Despite his claim of Prophet-hood there is no Prophet after last Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and therefore no revelation. Mirza’s claim of being Prophet goes against following Ahadith: “Anas bin Malik narrated: The Messenger of Allah said: 'Indeed Messenger-ship and Prophethood have been terminated, so there shall be no Messenger after me, nor a Prophet.' He (Anas) said: ‘The ...'" [Ref: Tirmadhi, B8, H2272, here.] He (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) also said he is al-Aqib and it means, last, after whom there is no Prophet: “… I am Al-Hashir who will be the first to be resurrected, the people being resurrected there after; and I am also Al-Aqib (i.e.the end, the last).’” [Ref: Bukhari, B56, H732, here.] “… I said to Zuhri: What does (the word) al-Aqib imply? He said: One after whom there is no Prophet. And in the hadith transmitted on the authority of Ma'mar and Uqail there is a slight variation of wording.” [Ref: Muslim, B30, H5812, here.] These Ahadith establish Mirza’s claim of being a Prophet and receiving Wahi goes against teaching of Islam. Qadiyanis typically argue Mirza is a prophet of former era and the verse of Khatam al-Nabiyeen prohibits coming of new Prophets but not old Prophet returning (i.e. Prophet Isa alayhis salam) and receiving Wahi. First of all the Ahadith make it clear REVELATION/WAHI has ended. Secondly even if a former Prophet was to return his return would be of an Ummati and not Nabi. Section 5.5 sub-section (ii) provides explanation that even a former Prophet returning as a Prophet not possible because Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) computed three different belief of al-Maseeh and regarding all three he said there is no Prophet after me. Please referr to mentioned subsection.

6.0 – Conclusion:

Khatam al-Nabiyeen means last/end of Prophets and is explained in Ahadith to mean after whom there is no Nabi. Prophet Isa (alayhis salam) was sent to Bani Israeel and not to mankind. His return would be as an Ummati of last/end of Prophets. Thus his ascension and Khatamiyyah are in total agreement.

Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen.

Muhammed Ali, al-Qadri, al-Razavi
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom