lack of evidence ,have you seen the new video footage of
building 7 how is it possible for a 47 story building to fall on its on footprint when theres hardly any damage to it ,its called control demolition ,any fool can see that .
There was plenty of damage something in the order of 25% structure was damaged or 'scooped out'. The NIST did a full investigation and explained
exactly what happened, whatever you or anyone else says is irrelevant, unless you personally were apart of the investigation.
This explains the collapse of wtc 7:
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released its long-awaited report on the collapse of World Trade 7 following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. "Our take-home message today is that the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder told journalists at this morning's press conference in Gaithersburg, Md. "WTC 7 collapsed because of fires fueled by office furnishings. It did not collapse from explosives or from diesel fuel fires."
After 7 hours of uncontrolled fires, a steel girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to one of the 81 columns supporting the building. Floor 13 collapsed, beginning a cascade of floor failures to Floor 5. Column 79, no longer supported by a girder, buckled, triggering a rapid succession of structural failures that moved from east to west. All 23 central columns, followed by the exterior columns, failed in what's known as a "progressive collapse"--that is, local damage that spreads from one structural element to another, eventually resulting in the collapse of the entire structure.
"Even without the structural damage, WTC 7 would have collapsed from fires."
According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. ft. of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down.
A key factor in the collapse, NIST concluded, was the failure of structural "connections that were designed to resist gravity loads, but not thermally induced lateral loads." According to Sunder: "For the first time we have shown that fire can induce a progressive collapse."
World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest - Popular Mechanics
say this to all the profs at my university that studyied wtc and found out sir that in no way wtc could collaps soo fast and with such pinpoint collapsing methods like controaled demolition . more and more people are finding out the truth you sir ignor it beacuse the way you where brought up to belive that the goverment loves and cares for you. tell me you would be still here when the cuban missel chrises your goverment had no seconds thoughts to nuke one of its own major cities . ww3? you would be here defending without knowing the truth ? correct?
How would your professor know? And the controlled demolition theory is just rediculous beyond words.
Do you have any idea what goes into a demolition? It takes months to prepare a building for demolition, this includes stripping out walls and floorboards as well as cutting through pipes for the hundred or thousands of holes that are needed for the dynamite charges, each stick of dynamite also have a charge wire, which is then connected to other sticks of dynamite, the end result is miles of charge wire. Do you really think that no one noticed this? Or anything else involved with a demolition?
them towers didnt fall, they imploded from top to bottom disintegrated in to dust even before they touched the ground at free fall speed defies gravity .
Building implode from the bottom down not the opposite. The dust is also very normal, remember the wtc was not stripped and gutted and the windows were not removed like they are in demolitions, so the dust is simply sheetrock and other materials and since the windows were not removed the compressed air made for a dramatic collapse.
I also happen to know an explosives export that worked 25 years for the FBI, if explosives were used there would be no survivors. First off the shock wave would turn your organs into soup; even if by a miracle you were to survive the shockwave you would either get your limbs blown off from the explosives or the debris would kill you. Moral of the story is, there were survivors.
Wrong, it was aluminum from the aircraft, and yes aircraft do melt:
thats what you dont get, some of them simply do not have a rational debunking, to insist there is an unchallengeable refutation is a lit
FYI none of your claims have any factual evidence to back them up and, no loose change doesn't count.
take for example the passport surviving - that was completely against the odds - but the very fact that you insist there is a "debunking" of it proves paranoia, you do not want to admit that there were some unexplainable against the odd's events - probably because you are afraid where it will lead to?
I hope you know that there were drivers licenses found from passengers. Now to 'rationally debunk' you about the passports, both aircraft hit the wtc at extremely high rates of speed, it took milliseconds from the time of impact to the time the aircraft debris exited the other sides of the buildings. The energy as well as the shockwave from the explosion expelled debris including passports, to put it in simple terms no passport, wallet, or ID will sustain major damage if it's exposed to a brief fire. Moreover, items such as passports, ID's ect, are usually stored in lugguage which would protect the items from outside forces.
So why not USA once for all let any one who wants to find out what happend give them free hands ? Why have many ppl who dout 9/11 have been visted by
CIA/FBI ?
This is just sad.
How low can people stoop when they source loose change and other youtube armatures? All of the claims from that garbage documentary(loose change) which, btw, was created by teenagers has been debunked. Crap claims such as there was no debris from flight 93 are just wrong, other claims such as the wreckage from the engines was inconsistent has also been debunked. Do you really think that some teenagers magically figured out the truth? Sad how people take their trash as facts.
...You really are that incompetent with keywords searches?
up from the deciet and lies of the zionist
, i belieive 9/11 was done by us,i feel ashamed to be an american fat slob
and once mods see you its
