What's new

300 Pakistani students stranded in Bangladesh cry out for help

Out of all renowned institutes in pak and across Asia, these students could only manage to find Bangladesh knowing fully well that its the scaled down version of India and they can get victimized for being Pakistanis?
Every would-be doctor in Pakistan does not deal with politics as you are doing here for nothing. Is it a thread on bilateral politics? Think why your govt has failed to evacuate your citizens, a BD govt local organ is supposed to look after them, though!!
 
.
Out of all renowned institutes in pak and across Asia, these students could only manage to find Bangladesh knowing fully well that its the scaled down version of India and they can get victimized for being Pakistanis?

C'mon yaar - no one victimizes Pakistani students in Bangladesh. Bygones are bygones.


 
Last edited:
. . .
Out of all renowned institutes in pak and across Asia, these students could only manage to find Bangladesh knowing fully well that its the scaled down version of India and they can get victimized for being Pakistanis?

Sirji, it's simple formula of supply and demand, supply in this case is lesser facilities among many other reasons. Many female students out perform male students in Pakistan and therefore get seat priority based on merit. Whereas many rich pay for private universities and institutes. Where will a male student from middle class or poor class, who also work to run his house, go to complete his education and dreams? Unfortunately in Pakistan anyone who is bachelor or below is mostly rejected from my high class job positions.
 
.
I do not consider Kashmiris Indian.:p:
But it does not change the reality. They use Indian passport, they are Indian citizen legally. They travel to the world including Bangladesh as a citizen of India, not as a Kashmiri. As long as India continue to control Kashmir, they are Indians in a legal point of views whether someone like it or not.
 
.
But it does not change the reality. They use Indian passport, they are Indian citizen legally. They travel to the world including Bangladesh as a citizen of India, not as a Kashmiri. As long as India continue to control Kashmir, they are Indians in a legal point of views whether someone like it or not.

World considers Kashmir to be disputed territory and so legally Kashmiris are not Indians, even though out of necessity they hold Indian passports.
 
.
But it does not change the reality. They use Indian passport, they are Indian citizen legally. They travel to the world including Bangladesh as a citizen of India, not as a Kashmiri. As long as India continue to control Kashmir, they are Indians in a legal point of views whether someone like it or not.




india controls 45% of Kashmir. Not all of it.
 
. . .
Kids, your bad luck of choosing mini India for studies. Let's wait for this corona sh¡t to end then we'll air pick you from that sh¡t hole.
 
.
World considers Kashmir to be disputed territory and so legally Kashmiris are not Indians, even though out of necessity they hold Indian passports.
Who told you territorial dispute legally nullify citizenship of the country who exercise control over the people? Then what is the citizenship of Kashmiri? Or they stateless?
 
.
Who told you territorial dispute legally nullify citizenship of the country who exercise control over the people? Then what is the citizenship of Kashmiri? Or they stateless?


They are not technically recognised as Indians in international law as Kashmir is seen as disputed territory.

They have opted to use Indian citizenship for now and this is just for practical purposes. Kashmiris have not gained Indian passports through choice but through necessity.

If you do not agree then that is fine as this is a complex topic.
 
.
They are not technically recognised as Indians in international law as Kashmir is seen as disputed territory.

They have opted to use Indian citizenship for now and this is just for practical purposes. Kashmiris have not gained Indian passports through choice but through necessity.

If you do not agree then that is fine as this is a complex topic.
As a foreigners, We only have to look at passport. If they carry Indian passport then they are legally Indian citizen irrespective of the status of their territory. What if any ethnic Kashmiri individual not the resident of Kashmir but from other part of India? Or personally satisfied to be a Indian citizen? Should not we consider such Indian passport holder a Indian citizen just because he is a Kashmiri? Not doing so does not make any sense. That's why I say, look at their passport rather than what ethnicity or territory they belongs.
 
Last edited:
.
World considers Kashmir to be disputed territory and so legally Kashmiris are not Indians, even though out of necessity they hold Indian passports.
I agree with you on this case. But unfortunately our govt doesn't recognize it. They consider kashmir as part of india, or at least remain silent by saying it as India's internal matter. But I wish one day we will officially support our kashmiri brothers and sisters, as Pakistan is doing.

They are not technically recognised as Indians in international law as Kashmir is seen as disputed territory.

They have opted to use Indian citizenship for now and this is just for practical purposes. Kashmiris have not gained Indian passports through choice but through necessity.

If you do not agree then that is fine as this is a complex topic.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom