So you have no proof and resort to insulying .
and that Amraam is not proof of anything , do you knew the part of the Slow TOR-M1 that we fired at Ukrain passenger jet fell how much away from the crash site , now consider how it can be for a fast moving AMRAAM that is at least 3 time faster.
Did India claimed you enter their airspace , they claimed you shoot their airplane by AIM-120 and F-16 you at first claimed it was JF-17 that it seems later you agreed with Indian version.
by the way how you reach to the conclusion that I said you guys entered Indian Air space ?
the question , why there is no atelite imagery of that. ? the eye witness may have mistaken something else
India also provided Radar data of an Pakistani F-16 vanishs from screen that it prove anything at all . do you believe on their claims according to it ?
I agree to that and their fighting strategy was a total meh , worthy of primary school child planning not a military planner. they were inconsistent , didn't used the assets acoording to situation ,didnt plan well , failed to use surprise element . failed to do even bomving a defenceles building sitting out there . thats really beg for shake down in chain of command
there cn be many reason for that , it may have been just a warning , the equipment could be faulty , the pilot may had to pull out due to enemy fire, ..... , do you have the video that can narrow the posiblities a lot.
they were in the mission , they were not gave the bombing part , they were tasked to protect the bombing planes from enemy fighters. but nevertheless they were part of the operation.
I already said Indian claims about the bombing and F-16 are just face saving and their performances in planning the operation was at best, what you expect from a primary school kid to plan. they nearly failed in all metrics.
the question why there is satellite imagery about anything else but non about that Su-30MKI and as you see again no proof provided in that post