What's new

27 Feb 19: PAF shot down two Indian aircrafts inside Pakistani airspace: DG ISPR

Why stop there? Lets just make him the next PM of India*.

When I saw this charming interpretation for a dogfight, I wanted to throw up, but then no one would've noticed it with the amount b.s. surrounding it.

His narrative has more holes in it than a Swiss cheese (not something to be confused with Sunny Leone).

*If this jerkoff is successful in selling this bull, and gets countless hits by frustrated Indians - than yeah, he should be the perfect candidate for a PM position.

Why Pakistanis have not shown this video poster Indians true face on youtube!!
Swiss Cheese is tasty. Sunny Leone is good filling all of her holes with something she considers enjoyable.
His holes are like of the one's Bipin had after 27th. Non stop wetting and dirtying of his dippers.
 
Pakistan ‘moves fighter jets’ amid simmering cross-border tensions with India

PAKISTAN has moved some of its fleet of F-16 fighter jets amid fears they could be targeted in possible airstrikes by India.


By SIMON OSBORNE

PUBLISHED: 14:53, Sun, May 19, 2019 | UPDATED: 14:58, Sun, May 19, 2019

Pakistan-F16-fighter-jet-1129236.jpg


A Pakistan Air Force F16 fighter jet (Image: GETTY)
Sources said Pakistan Air Force (PAF) commanders were still worried about possible attacks more than two months after an Indian Air Force (IAF) counter-terror strike on Pakistan’s Balakot region. The sources told India’s Economic Times newspaper the PAF F-16s had been flown from their home bases in Punjab province an redeployed across satellite airbases to avoid major losses in possible strikes from India.

RELATED ARTICLES
They said the PAF “has been at forward locations all along the Line of Control and the International Border after the Balakot strikes and its failure to counter India”.

The Pakistan Army has also maintained a heavy deployment of tanks and armoured regiments along Sialkot region close to Jammu region and Indian forces are keeping a close watch on their activities there.

India has also made precautionary deployments against these armoured formations on its side of the borders including its own advanced armoured forces.


The latest move comes amid simmering tensions between Islamabad and New Delhi which boiled over on February 14 when at least 40 Indian security personnel were killed in a terrorist attack in Pulwama, India.

India Pakistan: Kashmir issue cannot keep boiling says PM Khan

Responsibility for the deadly attacks was claimed by the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terrorist group.

Indian officials accused Islamabad of harbouring and sponsoring the Islamist extremists and launched retaliatory airstrikes on alleged terror infrastructure targets in Pakistani territory.

Pakistan, which denied the Indian allegations, responded with tit-for-tat raids and said it downed two IAF fighter jets in aerial clashes.

Pakistan-F16-fighter-jet-1876734.jpg


Pakistan has redeployed some of its F16 fighter jet (Image: GETTY)
An Indian pilot who ejected was released a few days later in what Islamabad called a “peace gesture”.

India has confirmed the loss of only one of its warplanes and suggested a MiG-21 Bison jet was struck after it had shot down a Pakistani F-16. The PAF denies losing any of its fighter jets.

Both sides remain on high alert after the February clashes.

UK Source: https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...-conflict-pakistan-air-force-f16-fighter-jets

What kind of crap is this?

Any competent airforce will disperse their assets in war time to smaller bases that are activated only during escalations/war.

This is to ensure that they could respond timely to any threat (see distance of Sargodha from different border regions) and cover all the airspace while increasing loiter time on station.

No one would park 40+ F-16s in a single base during escalations.

Asset disbursal is key to mobility apart from survivability.
 
most of such videos on youtube are nothing but a load of BS. and as far as intrusion is concerned, the MKI can see upto 400 kms and your F16 will get a missile hit even before they see us coming. So dont believe too much on these nonsense videos.
So it turns out it was other way around but never mind
I love how " SU 30 will shot down falcon even before falcon see Sukhoi" boys have gone AWOL since 27th Feb
 
Dnt wori more is coming..keep ur jets in bunkers to prevent escalation
3 months and counting still waiting for IAF come

This is how pakistan responded. "India only killed some trees" we can grow it again , so no worries ".
And most of Pakistanis believing in their lies for face saving bcz they don't have capabilities to counter strike.
This is how it is gonna end " Pulwama".
No it ended with 2 indian jets downed by PAF and 1 chopper wasted in fratricide
 
The big RCS of the Su30MKI is a problem that the IAF simply cannot fix and it will always be exposed to new variants of longer range AAM's because of its RCS will attract missiles at ever longer ranges as new AAMs are developed. The engagement of the 27th Feb 2019 showed that the era of WVR has for the time being taken the back seat, and the focus is on tactics and longer range AAM's and electronic counter measures.
 
. The engagement of the 27th Feb 2019 showed that the era of WVR has for the time being taken the back seat, and the focus is on tactics and longer range AAM's and electronic counter measures.

I think this is the wrong conclusion. HOBS WVRs with HMDSshould be the next challange which PAF should take on. It is a deficiency in the PAF armamentarium. However it maybe that till this is fulfilled PAF may play to its strength in BVR and engage in BVR and run back to base to reload.
A
 
I think this is the wrong conclusion. HOBS WVRs with HMDSshould be the next challange which PAF should take on. It is a deficiency in the PAF armamentarium. However it maybe that till this is fulfilled PAF may play to its strength in BVR and engage in BVR and run back to base to reload.
A
In places like Kashmir long range BVR can be avoided by simply terrain masking behind a hill or mountain within 5-15 seconds, here as we just saw with the M21 , it was a close quarter fight , hobs missile are required, BVR is not 100% reliable id say 80% but a extreme G pulling hobs is at least 98% reliable
 
Talking of WVR fight, Pakistan is using AIM-9M's latest tranche which is just a model before X series. Very capable. Can distinguish between flares and actual aircraft under circumstances.
 
Talking of WVR fight, Pakistan is using AIM-9M's latest tranche which is just a model before X series. Very capable. Can distinguish between flares and actual aircraft under circumstances.
Not on thunders though , the South African option by denel would be good for thunders or preferably , local hobs in the next 5 years
 
Talking of WVR fight, Pakistan is using AIM-9M's latest tranche which is just a model before X series. Very capable. Can distinguish between flares and actual aircraft under circumstances.




Bro are you sure that we downed their Su30 on Feb 27 or did they manage to evade the AMRAAM's?? How have they been able to hide the wreckage from their media?
 
We managed to integrate AIM-9 lima and papa versions on F-7s. God willing, we will integrate mike too on thunder. Who knows. ;)

But we have like 200 of the M versions. Hardly enough to cover full inventory of F-16s and the JF-17s at the same time.

We need a long term solution for JF-17s in form of a Chinese/SA/Brazilian solution.
 
Back
Top Bottom