Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
many facts prove that IA coudn't stand a single blow by PLA in 1962. If you feel itchy this time again, then sorry we have to let it happen again.
That's why he is lame to the most. How China won't fight back while you build hundreds of post along the borer and erosed our land? This is the most funny excuse that i ever come across. Go tell it to Pakistanis.
****How can you count on those lame Tibetan soldiers *****
Show me the photo.
many facts prove that IA coudn't stand a single blow by PLA in 1962. If you feel itchy this time again, then sorry we have to let it happen again.
Sometimes i just curious about the real combat ability of the Indian soldiers, maybe 1962 is a hallucination?
oh come on, Nehru is not a saint. He shall be punished in hell for what he had done. called backstabbing? or blinded by aspiration.Withstand? haha.
and for FACTS: PLA back in bunkers, IA gets Sikkim for India, IA also has AP, IA pummels PLA in Nathu LA.
Other then fake showoff, there is nothing in substance done by PLA. PLA needs to recover lot of ground before being considered as capable enough to take on IA.
What has PLA gained ever?
Nehru made mistake in trusting China. Agreed. and mistakes do happen. But to correct you. In your earlier post you didn't call Nehru lame. You called Tibetan soldiers as Lame.
Although I am a pacifist against war,I have to say you are really too optimistic for IA.You have not held on to any area. Chumur also you went back. 1962 also you went back. While India has made handsome gains in Sikkim. From 1962 onwards IA has got more in terms of actual results on the ground then PLA.
Also today IA is better entrenched and better suited for mountain war then PLA. IA also enjoys total support from people of Bhutan and Nepal, and great support from inside Tibet.
So overall IA has a lot more chance of winning a border war with China, then PLA has against IA. its based on facts, and not chest thumping (based on 62) or over nationalism.
Its minimal conflict, said IA is gonna win the war if IAF attended the conflict?A few thousand men in a few weeks time of conflict without any involvement of airforce or navy or regular army but a single division cannot be catagorized as an actual war.
Its just a confrontation.
The weakest China in 1962 defeat the strongest IA, what you say?Although I am a pacifist against war,I have to say you are really too optimistic for IA.
In 1962,India had support from both USA and SU,you lost the game.At that time,China was under chaos and famine.
Nowadays,IA become more powerful,so is PLA.
If we remember the pain of war,we'd better value peace life and refuse wasting blood of any Indian or Chinese.
Its minimal conflict, said IA is gonna win the war if IAF attended the conflict?
oh come on, Nehru is not a saint. He shall be punished in hell for what he had done. called backstabbing? or blinded by aspiration.
Although I am a pacifist against war,I have to say you are really too optimistic for IA.
In 1962,India had support from both USA and SU,you lost the game.At that time,China was under chaos and famine.
Nowadays,IA become more powerful,so is PLA.
If we remember the pain of war,we'd better value peace life and refuse wasting blood of any Indian or Chinese soldier.
The weakest China in 1962 defeat the strongest IA, what you say?
India is a supa powa back in1962?
Compared to the Indian Army, which is arguably the world’s most battle hardened military, the PLA is relatively inexperienced, with limited exposure to wars over the last 50 years, save for the one with Vietnam in 1979, from where it retreated in ignominy, besides some border skirmishes with India. Indian Army’ professionalism and mastery of the entire spectrum of conflicts, ranging from decades of counter-insurgency and guerrilla style operations to four wars with Pakistan, including Kargil, in a diversity of terrains and climatic conditions, remains unsurpassed.
armed insurgencies may be bad for the country, but they do contribute to military experianceOuch !
That hurts. Stop it.
New Recruit
China lacks in real Battle experience when compared to other asian countries like pakistan, india but China is trying to compensate lack of experience with equipments.
When was the last time China went to a battle in last 50 years. ??