What's new

1965 War Documentary Fath-e-Mobin

The butt kicking and thrashing india got in 1965 made them realize forever they cannot gatecrash Pakistan , they never attempted the failed frontal advance ever again
 
.
News paper cuttings

Khemkaran This what happend

558886649-view-of-indian-soldiers-standing-either-side-gettyimages.jpg


6533.jpg


27indian-army.jpg
6537.jpg

You are brainless hardcore pathetic Indian troll just to satisfy your humiliation keep posting random images.
 
. .
Yes because all those non-Pak news papers and pics were all made up lmao.
Do you have battle Trophies or credible Images On ground

there Lot Of articles

Neutral assessments
There have been several neutral assessments of the losses incurred by both India and Pakistan during the war. Most of these assessments agree that India had the upper hand over Pakistan when ceasefire was declared. Some of the neutral assessments are mentioned below —

The war was militarily inconclusive; each side held prisoners and some territory belonging to the other. Losses were relatively heavy—on the Pakistani side, twenty aircraft, 200 tanks, and 3,800 troops. Pakistan's army had been able to withstand Indian pressure, but a continuation of the fighting would only have led to further losses and ultimate defeat for Pakistan. Most Pakistanis, schooled in the belief of their own martial prowess, refused to accept the possibility of their country's military defeat by "Hindu India" and were, instead, quick to blame their failure to attain their military aims on what they considered to be the ineptitude of Ayub Khan and his government.

  • Devin T. Hagerty wrote in his book "South Asia in world politics"[117]
The invading Indian forces outfought their Pakistani counterparts and halted their attack on the outskirts of Lahore, Pakistan's second-largest city. By the time United Nations intervened on September 22, Pakistan had suffered a clear defeat.

  • In his book "National identity and geopolitical visions",[118] Gertjan Dijkink writes –
The superior Indian forces, however, won a decisive victory and the army could have even marched on into Pakistani territory had external pressure not forced both combatants to cease their war efforts.

In three weeks the second Indo-Pak War ended in what appeared to be a draw when the embargo placed by Washington on U.S. ammunition and replacements for both armies forced cessation of conflict before either side won a clear victory. India, however, was in a position to inflict grave damage to, if not capture, Pakistan's capital of the Punjab when the cease-fire was called, and controlled Kashmir's strategic Uri-Poonch bulge, much to Ayub's chagrin.

  • In his book titled The greater game: India's race with destiny and China, David Van Praagh wrote[8]
India won the war. It gained 1,840 km2 (710 sq mi) of Pakistani territory: 640 km2 (250 sq mi) in Azad Kashmir, Pakistan's portion of the state; 460 km2(180 sq mi) of the Sailkot sector; 380 km2 (150 sq mi) far to the south of Sindh; and most critical, 360 km2 (140 sq mi) on the Lahore front. Pakistan took 540 km2 (210 sq mi) of Indian territory: 490 km2 (190 sq mi) in the Chhamb sector and 50 km2 (19 sq mi) around Khem Karan.

  • Dennis Kux's "India and the United States estranged democracies" also provides a summary of the war,[120]
Although both sides lost heavily in men and material, and neither gained a decisive military advantage, India had the better of the war. New Delhi achieved its basic goal of thwarting Pakistan's attempt to seize Kashmir by force. Pakistan gained nothing from a conflict which it had instigated.

  • "A region in turmoil: South Asian conflicts since 1947" by Robert Johnson mentions[9]
India's strategic aims were modest – it aimed to deny Pakistani Army victory, although it ended up in possession of 720 square miles (1,900 km2) of Pakistani territory for the loss of just 220 square miles (570 km2) of its own.

  • An excerpt from William M. Carpenter and David G. Wiencek's "Asian security handbook: terrorism and the new security environment"[121]
A brief but furious 1965 war with India began with a covert Pakistani thrust across the Kashmiri cease-fire line and ended up with the city of Lahore threatened with encirclement by Indian Army. Another UN-sponsored cease-fire left borders unchanged, but Pakistan's vulnerability had again been exposed.

  • English historian John Keay's "India: A History" provides a summary of the 1965 war[122]
The 1965 Indo-Pak war lasted barely a month. Pakistan made gains in the Rajasthan desert but its main push against India's Jammu-Srinagar road link was repulsed and Indian tanks advanced to within a sight of Lahore. Both sides claimed victory but India had most to celebrate.

  • Uk Heo and Shale Asher Horowitz write in their book "Conflict in Asia: Korea, China-Taiwan, and India-Pakistan"[123]
Again India appeared, logistically at least, to be in a superior position but neither side was able to mobilize enough strength to gain a decisive victory.

Conflict resumed again in early 1965, when Pakistani and Indian forces clashed over disputed territory along the border between the two nations. Hostilities intensified that August when the Pakistani army attempted to take Kashmir by force. The attempt to seize the state was unsuccessful, and the second India-Pakistan War reached a stalemate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1965


 
. .
Lol we would think that Indian would keep their integrity and kept the war focused on Kashmir. But that wasn't possible was it?
Want to know another hilarious thing? While we were fighting you guys, China could have technically opened up another front to relieve you guys, but they never showed up LOL
 
.
Guys don't reply to this compulsive troll who just posting wikipedia copy paste stuff ignore him.
 
.
You are brainless hardcore pathetic Indian troll just to satisfy your humiliation keep posting random images.
Random Unlike your country we have Historical archives of Entire War if you have Any Intellectual capacity Read it
Those Picture are Well Documented Like these
Surrender-1.jpg


© History Division, Ministry of Defence, Government of India

http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/ARMY/history/1965war/275-war-history-1965.html


Guys don't reply to this compulsive troll who just posting wikipedia copy paste stuff ignore him.
Yeah Like you guys don't use it when it Suits you Lines
Do you Have any thing Historical

On ground Pictures Like I Posted
 
.
Random Unlike your country we have Historical archives of Entire War if you have Any Intellectual capacity Read it

© History Division, Ministry of Defence, Government of India
Haha lols pathetic third grade defense forum.

Bharat kakshak
why not you join there why you are polluting this forum? and acting like a headless chicken.
 
.
Want to know another hilarious thing? While we were fighting you guys, China could have technically opened up another front to relieve you guys, but they never showed up LOL

First of all we never asked for help. Second, our relations with China were not that strong.
 
. .
Haha lols pathetic third grade defense forum.

Bharat kakshak
why not you join there why you are polluting this forum? and acting like a headless chicken.
That Is Not Defense Forum But Defense Portal And redible are those Picture Fake No they are Publically available And Historical Authenticated




 
.
We still halted the invasion. Also, the defender always loses more land than the aggressor.
We were the defenders, you were the aggressor. The war started with Operation Gibralter. But you ended up losing territory.
 
.

Mighty SSG Commandos :woot::azn:

0592.jpg


Burnt Out Turret
Major General Korla poses for a photograph inside a destroyed turret of a Pak Army Patton tank.


\
6532.jpg



Major General Sparrow
Major General Rajinder Singh Sparrow, MVC, GOC 1st Armoured Division, leans on a captured Pakistani Patton tank in this rare color photograph, after the Battle of Assal Uttar (True Answer). It is here where Pakistan's 1st Armoured Division, consisting of American-supplied Patton tanks, suffered a humiliating defeat from the Indian Army.
0597.jpg
 
.
So whats your point it was your army's plan to capture Lahore which they failed even commander ran away leaving his jeep behind So my point is that your army fails to achieve its goals which considered failure and defeat.

Jeep left behind by Indian Maj. Gen. Prasad near Lahore, Pakistan, on 8 September 1965.
Lahore1965.jpg

1965-Indo-Pak-War-Memorabilia-Jeep-of-Maj-Gen-Niranjan-Prasad-GOC-15th-Indian-Infantry-Division-captured-by-18-Baluch-Regt-on-8-September-1965-Photos-and-Mementos-of-1965-War.jpg
Our Major Gen escaped, but your GoC was killed when our tank shot down your helicopter on 12th September
hcpak.jpg
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom