Search results

He said a lot more than just that. Watch the full video. Even these words essentially mean : ''If I think any country is planning something against my country, I will support terrorists there''. Having some supposed justification does not make it legal, moral or otherwise ok to support...

Okay, here's your proof for both cases Mr Elite Member. Case 1, Parrikar's statements in his interview: Case 2, LTTE attacked the Sri Lankan Army in 1983. Actual story of the attack that sparked the riots - Flashback: Tinneveli, July 1983 Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), Terrorist...

The majority of militants and terrorists are completely uneducated. A few educated people being radicalized here and there does not discredit the importance of education, because ultimately the chances of an educated person being radicalized are much, much less than that of an uneducated person...

Congratulations @WAJsal I was about to say the exact same thing.

The Police is what enforces the legal system. It was the legal system. Do you realize that the cleric who was arrested was arrested under the part of the legal system that declares incitement to violence illegal? You expect too much morality of them. They can put sanctions whenever they want...

Some points may be accurate, but the conclusions derived from them and the context they are in completely distorts them. @AgNoStiC MuSliM described it very well in his post There are too many stupidities, fabrications and contradictions for any of it to be take seriously.

Yes, it does. You actually made a good analysis right there. Illiteracy and intolerance are the root causes. The Blasphemy law is a representation of intolerance in particular. We've been arguing against the Blasphemy Law for a long time, it has to be gotten rid of or massively reformed if we...

What a mind boggling bunch of bullshit this entire article is.

Do you honestly think angry mobs wouldn't form if the Blasphemy Law didn't exist?

Good that a murder was averted, now all that's needed is for the mullah to be hanged for inciting violence and terrorism. Set an example. The law is what saved the couple and arrested the cleric. Read the article. And show your real flags.

No, I don't. Your surety is misplaced. He mentioned both Pakistan and China in his speech. When they started fighting them after the LTTE attacked a Sri Lankan Army patrol. 1983. One can easily conclude anything, but these conclusions mean absolutely nothing unless they're backed by proof.

Apparently there's an exception if the discussion is of any quality and not just trolling. Though the mods really do need to clarify their stance on this. As for playing holier-than-thou, I'm not saying I am better than @Zarvan or @Peaceful Civilian . I am saying I disagree with their...

How do you know that he took the picture to look arrogant? What if he took the picture to prove that he actually met British authorities so as to shut people like you up? You can rant as much as you want about ''media superman'' or whatever nonsense you're feeding yourself, but there is now...

It is common knowledge that Pakistan allied with the US and supported the Afghan Mujahideen to fight the Soviets. Back then, well, the image below shows what the world thought of the people we were supporting: We never supported terrorists. We supported freedom fighters who wanted peace and...

Meray bhai kidher hai pessimistic behaviour? Since when did my opposing militancy become bigotry? Please quote one post in which I have said anything that amounts to sectarian bigotry. You have to leave this habit of jumping to conclusions and declaring others pessimists or bigots. None of my...

So now that both Scotland Yard and Mr.Merchant have verified the report, your only counter-argument is that somehow because this 'mindset' failed to prove 35 punctures, every allegation must be wrong. Hadd hai. What's filthy about eating food with non-Muslims? They are humans. We are allowed...

The rules for the Prophet's time were different. Desperation, direct divine intervention - not applicable to today's Muslims. What's new, meray bhai, is that we Muslims need to start taking a more logical approach to things. Develop our nations. Then worry about Qital and Jihad for others. At...

No, I interpreted ''a Muslim ruler'' as a ruler. Read the Hadith again. This is backed even further by the point that half the strength of the enemy is required to begin an armed struggle. Can a small group have half the strength to win against an oppressing state? Not very likely. Therefore...

We can't deny the Quran's verses, but we can read them properly and in context. That verse is specific to the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) and his time period. The verse is addressed to the Prophet (s.a.w), not the believers in general like many other verses are. Like I said, unless someone here...

That ayah is addressed to the Prophet (s.a.w). Unless someone over here thinks they are the Prophet (nauzubillah), it is not relevant to the discussion.