F15's F100 engine also had poor quality but now it is reliable.The latest batches of WS-10A has solved most of the problems and our naval aviation is still receiving flakers with WS-10A.The picture captured by P8A had proved it.
Su-27sk only service in PLAAF and they are now retiring,our naval aviation only have J11BHs J-15s and Su-30MK2s.The fighter in the picture is a typical J11BH(equiped with domestic engines and missiles) from one of the naval aviation division in Hainan.BTW,that division is also one of the main...
Estimated number of towed artillery in service:
(18 guns per battlion)
≈60 battlions of PL66 (152mm)
≈30 battlions of PL59A (130mm)
≈20 battlions of PL96 (122mm)
≈10 battlions of PL83 (light weight 122)
That's because PLAN haven't developed for almost 20years.In 1994,PLAN got its first modern destroyer type 052.And from 2005 to 2012,PLAN didn't put any new destroyer into service.We are just fixing the lag.
At least we can make the conclusion by analysing the public data and technical paper.Of course we dont have any blue prints but the tech level can be roughly speculated by its basic physical data and working mode.SO,by your logic,how can you make that comment without any proof?
Restricted...
lol,
9.7Ma HQ-19 with KKV can be proved by techical paper.Go back and play with your low-tech PDV and PAD which is only capable to intercept few out-dated SRBMs with its poor frag warhead.