Search results

I have no doubt that your feelings and the feelings of millions of Chinese regarding this shrine is genuine. However, like I mentioned in my original post, these are really just excuses for the Chinese armed forces to take their new toys for a spin. I mean what good could possibly come of...

No, it wouldn't. Right now, China is a global power with a lot of new toys. They want to try them out. They want to push their neighbhors around. That's what's really happening. The rest of it, likeJapanese PM's tribute to fallen soldiers or India's new "assertive" policy and all the other real...

Suing someone else for war crimes? The word "laughable" comes to mind.

I don't know if there is such a law but even if it was true, it wouldn't apply to Pakistan since it is not a landlocked country

I'm not underestimating Bangladesh at all. It's Pakistan that's the problem for Bangladesh. Everything Pakistan touches turns to shyt. That's why I'm advising them to leave anything Pakistan out of it. For the record, Killed Bin Ladin and tossed the body in the ocean, Knocked out your Taliban...

I think Bangladesh could do. The only obstacle is an incompetent ISI. I mean do they really want to trust an organization that can't stop terrorist attack on their own military bases?? @BDforever - You're better than this. Don't ruin your chances of a successful takeover by involving incompetent...

And despite that doctrine, we've been in Iraq twice, Afghanistan, Korea, Vietnam and have bases in japan, Qatar and residual forces in Afghanistan. So much for that doctrine.

I thought it was revised to no first use against non-nuclear nations. Am I wrong?

I do too. Then it occur to me that there are worse fates than being a Hindu. They could have turned out like this idiot on an Internet forum who calls himself @TeesraIndiotHunter. Now that's a fate worse than death itself.

Your comprehension of freedom of speech is pretty pathetic. Go to India and say Hanuman was a effing ape, PEOPLE might beat you up, the GOVERNMENT will not punish you. Call someone's mother a pornstar in the USA, GOVERNMENT will not punish you for it. In fact, in both cases, the police will file...

I don't agree that there should be any kind of punishment for blasphemy. I think it's ridiculous that there is a punishment for hurting someone's feelings. That's idiotic.

People use all kinds of laws to their benefit. However, blasphemy laws are stupid. Why? Because the evidence is almost always based someone's word. Have you ever seen a blasphemy conviction based on video or DNA? Putting someone death based solely on someone's word that a crime has even OCCURRED...

How did you miss the part of post I was responding to where the poster said Indians were introduced to Buddhism by the British? It's right there as part of my post. Why would you even go off on your rant without reading that? What does that guy not knowing the basics of history have to do with...

Bring an extra chair and some popcorn, I wanna be there when that dude tries :partay:

@pehgaam e mohabbat Buddha (Siddhartha Gautama) was born in what is now Nepal. Buddhism (the religion) came about after he attained enlightenment at Bodh Gaya. That's why it is one of four most important sites in Buddhism.

You know Buddhism came from India, right?

Yes there is. Take a look at the world map. It's actually a couple of years older than the People's Republic of China

Chinese have held Tibet way longer than we've held any of the north eastern states. The Yuan dynasty had it. Ming lost it and Qing got it back. Where are you learning your history from?? Tibetians don't like it? Fair enough. But somehow relating them to India really is a bridge too far

Why don't you look up the Qing empire and get back to me on whether Tibet was "historically" a part of China or not?

Now, was that really necessary? You sound like Zaid Hamid and his Ghazwa E Hind.:p: