Mistakes from Indian side(official)? Please share a few? The only mistake i see is that they took freaking hours before they open their mouth...I mean for god sake, when you took initiative then you are expected to maintain it. We lost perception warfare right there and then. As said, i am sure...
I dont think that was the case here. It was DGP ISPR who said they have two Indian pilots with one in custody and other in hospital. They claimed, they downed two Indian jets and specifically called out, they have nothing to do with helicopter crash. This made Indian claim of downing F-16 even...
nada...basically the clearance was given in 2016 itself. If you have heard saraswat then he is crystal clear. Simulations proved that India can do it, with some work(both ABM and Agni 5 capabilities were used for simulation). Had they got clearance in 2012 they would have accomplished it in...
Actually there you can count on us, no matter what the situation is, we are very well capable of harming Indian narrative. To be honest, we are in a very new territory and still smarting up on it. Actions on other side of LOC was unheard of(atleast in Public domain), let alone IB. Just to set up...
I cant agree more on bold part. Precedents have been set and GOI would be hard pressed to not go hard should there is another significant terror attack. So region will again find itself in boil sooner or later...
If you think it was rectified pretty quickly then sure, however it went all the...
Very dangerous and can be very escalatory...however this is one aspect that can't be ruled out, should there is another terror attack...from an Indian point of view, no matter who is in power...another big terror attack and sitting PM should either resign for good or else give a nod...dangerous...
what has mi17 to do with this fiasco? I mean i know it crashed due to technical snag...but it was not a result of any combat...have i missed some information? please throw some light..
Good...one should never make sweeping comments on an entire state..because some lonely souls said something...
what...WTF happened to you and that too in the same post? :o::o:
well that is the actual issue...though i don't blame you...in today's world...confirmation bias is exponentially rising...doubts on media outlets(they are equally to blame for it) is on the rise..with media houses favoring one side over another...
I like the idea...this way we can easily become a top contender for banana republic...a country of billion plus buffoons....i would say...let pass on this for now...
agreed with all points...having said that matching nuclear warheads is not the aim we are after and i am sure that's what you meant as well...point is simple...effective deterrence is all we should seek and investing money on effective nuclear delivery system is what should be our focus on..once...
AC crowds? who are they? b/w unfortunately answer is no...problem is the block voting...whichever way it goes, candidate wins...now unless BJP is able to dent it...there is hardly a chance..we have multiple examples so far...BSP and SP combo, complemented by Congress is a major threat in...
I dont see a reason to have more than 130-140 warheads...i understand we want to produce more plutonium, so that we can produce weapons(in short time) should need arise, however above than the number we have, apart from wasting time and money, we wont achieve much. Effective delivery system is...
This issue has no meaning at this stage...this is the new strategy...before elections, raise issues out of the blue, make everyone talk about it..cash on it and then go silent.. This strategy of cry foul and then look other way, was started by AAP and now seems to be mastered by all...says a lot...
u do realize that aid is not being given to India govt. .... I hope you can clear your thoughts on such a basic thing...it might be very well a waste of effort on my part...yet...here is a link for you...
http://swachhbharaturban.gov.in/writereaddata/SBM_Guideline.pdf
The idea is to be...
its a signed deal...BJP is going ahead with it...Congress hardly have a case..unless and until...Indians loose their head....bring pappu as a PM and then he loose whatever is left in his head...and back off from the deal...then yes...there is a chance...but then think about it...headless indians...
Because they can't...Geo-politics is not about good guy/bad guy...good deeds/bad deeds...it is very much transactional...It was the same US in 71, that sent 7th fleet and had USSR not covered us, would have smacked us right and left....At that time Pakistan as an ally was more important than so...