Search results

The most disturbing part is the following: Earlier Dr Kapila had indicated here, of PA's penchant for moving around their 'crown jewels'. A terrible, terrible habit. Also, it appears Indian intelligence is tracking the Pakistani nukes pretty closely and they are doing a pretty good...

There is a lesson for us all - never make fun of someone's misfortune. That Karma has a way of sneaking up from behind and bite you in your azz.

After the war the Mukti Bahinis were indeed disarmed to ensure that further political violence didn't spread. Mukti Bahinis were not the official armed force of Bangladesh. They were still armed civilians. They needed to be disarmed. The Pakistani POWs were also taken in custody and given...

You and I should get together sometime, sit down and exchange our stash. Yours is obviously of better quality than mine.

Joe, this is the response from the owner of this site regarding Headley-Rana case. The rot is way too deep. PS: Welcome back.:yahoo:

All the live twits by Mr Colin Freeze have consolidated by Mr Steppen Wolf. This is day 1. Steppenwolf: Dr. Tuhawwar Rana’s Trial in Chicago as Tweeted by Colin Freeze Mr Freeze's twitter a/c: Twitter

Your agony has just begun. We will drip feed you as the case progresses. You can count on that. And now for some live twits from inside the courtroom. Follow her: https://twitter.com/#!/natashakorecki Also him: https://twitter.com/#!/Colinfreeze

Question that you should be asking is if those very same leaders acted in any belligerent manner so as to give an impression that India was looking to militarily annex Pakistan. Sticks and stones may break your bones, but words will never hurt you. Yes, thats why we did 1965. Oh wait.....

We don't need Mr Obama to tell us about Pakistan's disturbing obsession with India. We suffer from it. Have been doing so for 60 odd years. Without a break.

Thanks for confirming Mr Obama.

Playing victim comes naturally to some Pakistani hawks. First poke your neighbour, many orders in magnitude bigger and stronger, and then when this neighbour eyeballs you, you go all over the town complaining how this big neighbour is a threat to your existence. 80% of Indian military is on...

Rich Pakistanis living in US, Canada and all over Europe don't want US aid. Hmmm....why am I not surprised.

Void ab initio. Taliban had no locus standi as far as US was concerned. Taliban didn't carry out 9/11. But they harbored, willingly, a known terrorist and his infrastructure of terror. That itself is a crime.

So. How does that prove that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is not a Pakistani. Did I make any other claim?

Sure you can go back to the point when someone in middle of Africa suddenly stood up and started to walk on two legs many millenia ago and claim if that hadn't happened nothing would have happened to Pakistan. However, the point is, if Pakistan had conducted itself in a manner that is expected...

Oh, the news is confirmed by my 1st cousin's ex-girlfriend's dad's best friend's wife's brother's boss who knows someone in Pakistan, whose wife's father's neighbour's cousin's driver used to know the maid who used to work for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Or you could use google.

That was meant to illustrate how PA is viewed outside of Pakistan. At the end of what?

One twitter comment about PA reads: PA is like Anna Kournikova of tennis. Never won anything but gives everyone a hard-on.

This is exactly the 'tangled web' that Sir Walter Scott was talking about. You still don't get it, do you? Had there been no Taliban there wouldn't have been a OBL hiding in Afghanistan, no complication of law regarding sharing of evidence (see below) and therefore no Yankee hopping mad in...

...and they don't cross the border. Rehman Malik is right so far as terrorism originating from Pakistan is concerned. You can't say the same about 'saffronis' now, can you?