Search results

Considering both Tejas and JF17 has a very similar internal fuel capacity i highly doubt the quoted range for both fighters would be that different. JF17 has shirt legs just like Tejas. It's the downside for having a light weight fighter

Yes Chaff and/or flares Two more located underneath the aircraft as well

FSD is still in beta testing. These guys were using autopilot which still requires a human on driver's seat. Their own stupidity killed them.

I breath in tritium every other day working in a nuke plant. It's not that dangerous unless exposed to large quantity.

PLA would never order C919 for at least a couple of decades. Militaries like to operate proven platform with known limitations, flaws and aircraft with easily accessible spare parts. There is a reason Airbus offers a 30 year old A330 and Boeing a 40 year old 767 for air tankers and transport...

Labeling someone's wealth as new money is one way people are trying to remain relevant. No one cares about "old money". "New money" can buy old money thousand times and more. And no, the elite do not drive Toyotas and Hondas. And don't use Warren Buffet as an example either, he flies in...

Lovely to see a lot of butt hurt Pakistanis again. Why can't we be happy for someone else? Or better yet mind our own business. Buddy got himself a car that he likes, he paid for it and the exuberant taxes along with it. And Lucifer is a perfectly good name.

First of all, all investigations start from the crew whether its a maritime incident or aviation. SecondbMajority of the cargo ships and cruise ships are manned by Indians and other ethnicities from east asia. It's hard work to operate these ships especially considering the crew remains away...

Read the news again. It says Port Qasim, NOT Pakistan Navy

These are not "private" jets. These are business jets and if one trying to run a successful business they need them as tools to cut time traveling to see clients or make deals. Time = money if you're an important individual or a group.

So you're saying you understand the Americans better than the turkish military themselves?

Everything runs on electronics. Everything either has a shelf life or in service life (hours). If they load live weapons on aircraft just for the show, they will deplete through them fairly quickly.

We're refurbishing our 4 units at the cost $12.8 billion CAD This just includes replacement of certain parts, not the whole facility...

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/09/teslas-china-sales-more-than-doubled-in-2020.html Tesla is making constantupdatesto its cars while keeping up with the production. Not an easy task, most manufacturers update their designs when they start building cars for the new year.

Spent fuel has to sit in the pools of water for 10 years at least before it's safe for transport. Do you think they can work with that while it's still buzzing hot? No.

My educated guess would be TBO for certain parts and ease of maintenance. Certain helicopters are notorious for difficult access because of their poor internal layout. All that plays into operational capability. Airbus equipment has longevity and high reliability, A-stars are super famous up...

There are literally a handful of countries that build military helicopters and most of them have the same suppliers. I.e. Pratt and Whitney Canada, Turbomeca, Rolls Royce, Honeywell and so on. Even if you're able to get foreign license for critical parts such as engine, transmission, avionics...

Panasonic makes batteries for Tesla but they didn't design those Batteries, Tesla did. They're just producing them using Tesla's drawings and what not. Same goes for China making "iphones, laptops, too notch electronics" They're all designed in house by the companies and China just...

The amount of space, hydraulics, and other parts needed to have that done would be more detrimental to the performance. It would make it heavier and more complicated. It's beneficial to have them outside