Search results

dude, before anything ... with joint mechanism terrorist would be taken out, terrorist infrastructure would be removed only kashmiri would be allowed to reside ... there are many clauses avain thodi demarcation hoyegi

demarcation after 15 years not now, he mentioned immediate porus border, after 15 years they would jointly administer the state

I do agree about economic benefits, but as i said before .... these talks don't matter ... we already have a formula given by musharaf and manmohan ... realistically other than that both nations will not agree to anything else Why don't they take it up remains a mystery

It is understood bruv, non of our points are our govts Sir lets talk relevant here, India is pissed off because you are talking to separatist, now even if you tell me they are representatives they don't even hold minority seats in the assembly hence neither they are Representative of people of...

He would be in US

Our tough talks are not meant to appease pakistan, you are more than welcome, you intelligence agencies have been trying for decades now ... you can do that in the future too Pakistan never ever had desire for peace, the civilian govt might have, can't say the same about military Lets not...

Explain Paktun population in Azad kashmir and their surge from 1946 onwards The Untold Story of the People of Azad Kashmir Christopher Snedden also explains the same The Hindu : Miscellaneous / This Day That Age : dated July 20, 1954: Pakhtoons in Kashmir history was funny Again sir, agreed but...

you can't just talk randomly Musharaf and manmohan both agreed upon a fact of give and take presently they don't, you can't talk to someone who isnt ready to listen to you And yes, we have learned to live alone, it is a bit hard, but thats the bitter reality

india has learned to live without pakistan we are looking at alternate route's, unless both sit like mature individuals talks are waste of time and money ... only way ahead in Musharraf formula

Obviously large part of Pashtoon settled in Kashmir as far as massacre goes sir, it was partition both hindu's and Muslim where being Massacred There was no sympathy for muslims, if there was, more got massacred in UP than Kashmir Pasthoons where pushed to gain territories, in 1965 also the same...

Shaheed in Urdu means Martyr Martyr Urdu Meanings: شہید - shaheed - English to Urdu Dictionary

Crafting Peace in Kashmir: Through A Realist Lens - Verghese Koithara - Google Books Pakistan would not have had ownership of what is Azad Kashmir if the tribal Pakhtuns from FATA, in general, and of North and South Waziristan, in particular, had not arrived in Kashmir in 1947 and fought for...

Look at hurrayat 10 years ago and now, they have lost their relevance , putting them behind bars will make them a Hero

So ? aapne Quran ka theeka le rakha hai ?? There are more Muslims in India than Pakistan

we can't tackle with naxal's for this long ... yup we lack But you can't bomb the naxals .. 90% of naxals fight for injustice we have meted out to them, it is our fault ... it is in our interest to resolve things with dialogue .. same is with NE We need strong policies and need to act quick

The differences have out-grown co-operation the problem is population! nations here first need to develop themselves before they look for SAARC as a major player IF they want to look upto SAARC then disputes must be settled, it is stupid to see india doing more trade with china than SAARC...

Yes but we have paid a price for such We have lost our influence in our neighborhood esp sri lanka, nepal and bhutan we have to realize without taking out neighborhood into confidence we cannot move forwards, a progressive south asia will elevate india from regional powerhouse to a major world...

nah pakistan won't see another army coup, PA calls the shot behind the civilian govt anyways and they wouldnt want to spoil this arrangement India and Pakistan have been talking in air to be precise, pakistan wants kashmir and India doesnt want to budge both have to do a little give and take

u are right but the soft image have their draw-backs when you want to be influential you cannot rely in the soft-image, India would not completely abandon its soft-image neither would we participate in world fight against terrorism by invading countries. We would just have a tougher stand in...

sadly these projects are never take to industrialization level