What's new

U S strikes Abu Lais al Libi Killed

In a multi ethnic country, the Parliament is more representative of the ethnic balance since people are voted by the ethnic population of a constituency.

The Ministry does not have to carry the same representation since running a country is done by having the best people in the cabinet.

If representation was the criterion, then Mr Jinnah would not have selected Md Zafarullah Khan as the Foreign Minister of Pakistan ( a very important and critical appointment of a country) since he was an Ahmediyya, an Islamic sect that is not recognised as Moslem, and as per P2bP, Pakistan is but a totally Moslem and Islamic country.

Therefore, by the logic of "domination" being propounded, it would mean that a "non Moslem" was handed over the critical appointment when in actuality it should have gone to a person of a community dominating the Pakistani scene!

The contention is thus misplaced that any one community should dominate in the Ministry of a democracy, and such a statement indicates ignorance of the working of a democratic system.
 
You are a Beneficiary of Mughal Empire who didnot massacre your Ancestors!

Respect their Ignorance!
 
In a multi ethnic country, the Parliament is more representative of the ethnic balance since people are voted by the ethnic population of a constituency.

The Ministry does not have to carry the same representation since running a country is done by having the best people in the cabinet.

If representation was the criterion, then Mr Jinnah would not have selected Md Zafarullah Khan as the Foreign Minister of Pakistan ( a very important and critical appointment of a country) since he was an Ahmediyya, an Islamic sect that is not recognised as Moslem, and as per P2bP, Pakistan is but a totally Moslem and Islamic country.

Therefore, by the logic of "domination" being propounded, it would mean that a "non Moslem" was handed over the critical appointment when in actuality it should have gone to a person of a community dominating the Pakistani scene!

The contention is thus misplaced that any one community should dominate in the Ministry of a democracy, and such a statement indicates ignorance of the working of a democratic system.

One Ahmadiya in the ministry or administration or whatever you want to call it would be totally representative of the ethnic/religious balance of Pakistan. It's when you have 20 Ahmadiyas in a ministry of 30 people in Pakistan that the balance is not right. Similarly when you have 20 Tajiks/Pashtun puppets in a ministry of 25, then the balance is not right.

It's true that the administration is supposedly chosen by people, but with all the ink irregularities, and the violence occurring, Karzai's administration is not the one that the Pashtuns want.
 
Similarly when you have 20 Tajiks/Pashtun puppets in a ministry of 25, then the balance is not right.

It's true that the administration is supposedly chosen by people, but with all the ink irregularities, and the violence occurring, Karzai's administration is not the one that the Pashtuns want.

RR may be he and Sir Ray terms the selection of Karzai as balancing act :)

And one needs to remember that Karzai won beacuas Pakistan facilitated the billions of Afghan Refugees here with using right to vote otherwise he would not have won.
So saying that he was chosen by majoirty in Afghanistan is also not right.
 
One Ahmadiya in the ministry or administration or whatever you want to call it would be totally representative of the ethnic/religious balance of Pakistan. It's when you have 20 Ahmadiyas in a ministry of 30 people in Pakistan that the balance is not right. Similarly when you have 20 Tajiks/Pashtun puppets in a ministry of 25, then the balance is not right.

It's true that the administration is supposedly chosen by people, but with all the ink irregularities, and the violence occurring, Karzai's administration is not the one that the Pashtuns want.

If you have so many Ahemdiyas more intelligent than the rest, I presume that would be a better bet if the country has to do well, rather than have dumb chaps just because they are from the majority!
 
RR may be he and Sir Ray terms the selection of Karzai as balancing act :)

And one needs to remember that Karzai won beacuas Pakistan facilitated the billions of Afghan Refugees here with using right to vote otherwise he would not have won.
So saying that he was chosen by majoirty in Afghanistan is also not right.

I haven't understood this.

Are you suggesting that it was Pakistan which selected Karzai?

If so, then why the present dislike?
 
Because he has allowed Indian Terrorism camps inside for carrying terrorism in Pakistan.

And yet he was selected by Pakistan (as per you)?
 
If you have so many Ahemdiyas more intelligent than the rest, I presume that would be a better bet if the country has to do well, rather than have dumb chaps just because they are from the majority!

If you elect dumb people to rule a clever country, people will complain.

If you elect clever people to rule a dumb country, people will complain.

If you elect dumb people to rule a dumb country, people will be happy.

It all comes with education.

Btw, when I say dumb, I mean uneducated. No doubts you were thinking of dumb, as in incapable, and the Tagori in you was beaming with superior pride.
 
If you elect dumb people to rule a clever country, people will complain.

If you elect clever people to rule a dumb country, people will complain.

If you elect dumb people to rule a dumb country, people will be happy.

It all comes with education.

Btw, when I say dumb, I mean uneducated. No doubts you were thinking of dumb, as in incapable, and the Tagori in you was beaming with superior pride.

How pathetic!

You deserve everyone's pity!
 
Back
Top Bottom