Zakir Naik: Pakistan should not have been created

[SrNair]

Ok I get it you don't want to say that to them because they are belligerent and will try to label you as a traitor for having a soft spot for indian muslims.

They do blame us for the turmoil in their country but instead they should blame bush it was his so called operation to hunt obl and steal oil from iraq.

What are you trying to prove ?
When we files case against certain groups in court it would be Indians together irrespective of their religions.

There is no turmoil in India. And noone points fingers against some other nation.
All of this are just your imagination.
We have venues for proves their own pointb.Noone will blames you .

It was Obama that ordered ops to hunt OBL not Bush .I dont get this point.

 

[Nexus]

You didn't loss any land. It was our land all along. Similarly Indian muslims are living in their own land and Israel like solution is needed to give them huge piece of continues land as per their population number at that time when it happens. You can't control few Kashmiris now imagine 500 millions in 100 years from now.

RSS are pushing Indian muslims to the wall, revolt should be expected sooner or later.

Hindus are 3% in kashmir, 90% on average in mainland.

Only few thousand hindus have gone to India. We on the other hand have received millions of illegal Indian muslims migrants till 90's.

Only 50 muslims left for Pakistan, including jinnah and Lia ali khan.

Personally 2002 was but thing happened on my state, and we are eagerly waiting for another round. This time death match.

 

[SrNair]

Disappointment?! Lay off the toddy @SrNair

And do you actually believe you can justify human shields?

Once again for your eyes, the minorities of India:

Source: Blind in Kashmir with 100 pellets lodged in his head

If that is not disappointment then what is that ?
These cuts both ways. Terroists also uses human shields when they pelt stones or shooting against soldiers. Where was you at that time .
In here both soldiers ,officials and locals also have their own human rights .
Through his out of box thinking he protected everyone .kudos to him

We also didnt see cry when they tortured 4 lakh Pandits

 

[Khanate]

If that is not disappointment then what is that ?

A reality check on your delusions.

These cuts both ways. Terroists also uses human shields...

Then the Indian forces in Kashmir are also terrorist. Glad you made that clear.

Through his out of box thinking he protected everyone .kudos to him

Not according to Indian media:

An HT investigation found that locals in 17 villages of central Kashmir refuted the army’s claim that Major Gogoi faced massive stone pelting.

Major Gogoi says he tied Kashmiri Farooq Dar to his jeep on April 9 in order to save lives while facing a huge stone-pelting mob. When HT retraced his steps for 28 km over 5 hours, eyewitnesses dismissed the army’s claim and said the jeep drove around unprovoked.​

Read: ‘Human shield’ row: Claims, counter-claims by army Major, Kashmiri tied to jeep (Hindustan Times)

 

[SrNair]

A reality check on your delusions.





Then the Indian forces in Kashmir are also terrorist. Glad you made that clear.





Not according to Indian media:

An HT investigation found that locals in 17 villages of central Kashmir refuted the army’s claim that Major Gogoi faced massive stone pelting.

Major Gogoi says he tied Kashmiri Farooq Dar to his jeep on April 9 in order to save lives while facing a huge stone-pelting mob. When HT retraced his steps for 28 km over 5 hours, eyewitnesses dismissed the army’s claim and said the jeep drove around unprovoked.​

Read: ‘Human shield’ row: Claims, counter-claims by army Major, Kashmiri tied to jeep (Hindustan Times)

Well,Kashmiris in those 5 districts already gives enough experience So that noone trust them.

 

[Soumitra]

Only a very small insignificant minority of them. The vast majority of indian so called "Muslims" are more anti-Pakistani than even the sikhs and hindus are. Any way, to hell with the lot of them. They've got nothing to do with us. We may as well be discussing the lives of Eskimos in the North Pole. In fact I care more about Eskimos than indian Muslims.

I hope there are other pakistanis like you You mind your business we mind ours

 

[Mugwop]

What are you trying to prove ?
When we files case against certain groups in court it would be Indians together irrespective of their religions.

There is no turmoil in India. And noone points fingers against some other nation.
All of this are just your imagination.
We have venues for proves their own pointb.Noone will blames you .

It was Obama that ordered ops to hunt OBL not Bush .I dont get this point.

I was talking about afghanistan not india since you mentioned the afghan refugees.

Exactly, ultra liberal society doesn't embrace Blasphemy so overwhelmingly that murderers can be exalted to iconic stature in the society.

embrace? Have you heard of zia?

 

[MadDog]

Interesting. He said that in the past. While today in Hindutva ruled India, he has to escape and can't even come back
to India. Saudi King had to give him Saudi citizenship to protect him. This is the reality of today's India, I wonder what would be his views now.
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20170519-indian-terror-suspect-granted-saudi-citizenship/

 

[TMA]

Partition was the best thing to happen. But it would have been better if total exchange of population was done. I don't hate any religion.but I think practically. Muslims can not be loyal to any nation. It is against their religion. We are sitting on time bomb of 200 million potential traitors. That would be bloodiest civil war in history.
question is not will indian muslims revolt against India. Question is when? It is inevitable.

Well this was very difficult to have total exchange, it would have been better and more practical to have a few more Muslim countries from British India.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

I hope there are other pakistanis like you You mind your business we mind ours

The ground reality is that the majority are. The internet is not a place to gauge this fact. Far too many trolls. As far as I'm concerned, indian Muslims are identical to hindus & sikhs bar religion & beliefs. That's it. Which explains why the majority of them are anti-Pakistani.

If anything, Pakistan shares a border (aswell as centuries of culture) with Iran & not including language, we have far more in common with Iranians/Persians. Especially in terms of looks, genetics, physical appearance and culture. Yet we don't interfer with them. So who are indian so-called "Muslims" to us?

 

[utraash]

I was talking about afghanistan not india since you mentioned the afghan refugees.


embrace? Have you heard of zia?

Have you heard of blasphemy law?

 

[Zibago]

hellooooo...theres nothign wrong with Indian muslims.
Remember APJ Abdul Kalam was our president and the man heading our intelligence bureau is also a muslim. Two key positions that will never be given to a hindu in your country. or prove me wrong.

Yes there is nothing wrong thats why hudreds were blinded in Kashmir


Never say never?

 

[maximuswarrior]

Na ghar ka na ghat ka

This Indian takfiri Mullah is leading a third rate life in India. We understand the frustration. They cannot eat cow meat without getting murdered by their Hindu brothers.

 

[saurav jha]

Apart from religion and beliefs, indian Muslims are identical to indian hindus and sikhs in EVERY OTHER WAY. They are your people, your problem. Your race, culture, heritage, genetics & physical appearance. Why should Pakistan be burdened with them? The creation of Pakistan & bangladesh was just as much about race, ethnicity, genetics, heritage and culture as it was about religion.

Look after your race, don't expect Pakistan too. If members of your race and gene pool hate you then there is something seriously wrong with your country.

They voted for Pakistan and muslim league. This gives them every right over pakistan.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

They voted for Pakistan and muslim league. This gives them every right over pakistan.

Didn't know the indian Muslims in india at the moment are avid time travellers. Going back to before 1947 and voting for the creation of Pakistan? Cleaver bunch aren't they?

Fact is that not including religion and beliefs, current indians Muslims have everything in common with someone like you and nothing in common with someone like me. They probably have your physical characteristics and not mine's either.

The fact that nearly a century ago, SOME indian Muslims may have had affinity with the idea of Pakistan is neither here nor there. I have an affinity with the idea of Germany, Brazil and the Eskimos. Doesn't mean I have the right to go to these places and claim them as mine.