What's new

Your rape culture is not my religion

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think its the opposite.
what salman taseer did
what rahman malik is doing
what zardari fouzia wahab, and asima jhangir is doing
leave munawar hassan
they are not mullas they are not beared men so u will not blame them.
 
.
why u are targeting islam, in every thing .

He isn't targeting Islam buddy. He is targeting the people interpreting their version of Islam and calling it a lifestyle. The Quran or every other religious text may have covered everything there is to make sure one leads a good life, but when a zealot reads it his interpretation of it and overzealous application of it on everyone else destroys the basis of that religion.
 
.
In Pakistan no one messes with the man with the beard.
For Secular Fascists such as naveen naqvi the former model,hassan nisar and nadeem paracha and other dope men,there are blogs and cyber world were they can make all the noise they want :lol:
 
.
what salman taseer did
what rahman malik is doing
what zardari fouzia wahab, and asima jhangir is doing
leave munawar hassan
they are not mullas they are not beared men so u will not blame them.

You are just assuming I dont blame them...
How do you know I dont blame them?
Have we spoken on this.. or are you just coming in here with ignorant bias?
 
.
I am targeting all those who are defiling Islam for their conceited selves.
Those that have in every sense of the word "raped" Islamic teachings for their own gain. And I defile those who dont have the knowledge.. nor the courage to seek it.. and contest such people.
Instead they bow their heads like goats and bleat to the music of these mullah
here u come to the point u hate mullas
and last according to ullamas (not mullas) the majority of muslim scholars will go to hell for thier misguidance to common people.
i dont like munawar hassan but dont indulge islam in it and also all mullas

How do you know I am targeting all the Mullah's?
And why have you taken on the sword of defending Islam when it is not being targeted.. Instead of debating on the "badlagam" Mullah section.. you are bringing in Islam as a scare tactic.
"thou shalt not question god" argument..
especially when the argument is not even with god, his prophet or the word of god.
Why is it when discussing Islam with a fellow Muslim you must beat the drum of "you are questioning islam" when the current crop of clergy is questioned??
Is Munawwar hasan Islam?
are JI Islam?
Is maulana Tariq jameel islam?
They are Muslims.. but they arent Islam.. get this in your head.
 
.
How do you know I am targeting all the Mullah's?
And why have you taken on the sword of defending Islam when it is not being targeted.. Instead of debating on the "badlagam" Mullah section.. you are bringing in Islam as a scare tactic.
"thou shalt not question god" argument..
especially when the argument is not even with god, his prophet or the word of god.
Why is it when discussing Islam with a fellow Muslim you must beat the drum of "you are questioning islam" when the current crop of clergy is questioned??
Is Munawwar hasan Islam?
are JI Islam?
Is maulana Tariq jameel islam?
They are Muslims.. but they arent Islam.. get this in your head.

Nobody in Pakistan dares attack Islam directly most often best way to attack Islam is to Attack the Mullah so a person can hide behind secondly Rape Doesn't require 4 witness it is judge on the circumstance evidence in today times DNA medical Tests camera and other things can be used
 
.
Nobody in Pakistan dares attack Islam directly most often best way to attack Islam is to Attack the Mullah so a person can hide behind secondly Rape Doesn't require 4 witness it is judge on the circumstance evidence in today times DNA medical Tests camera and other things can be used


Will the majority of Muslim accept that technology can overrule what is written in the Sharia?
 
. .
Will the majority of Muslim accept that technology can overrule what is written in the scriptures?

It is not really the scriptures. It is the deliberate misinterpretation of those Mullahs that are hellbent on suppressing the fairer sex. If you show them the technology that goes against their interests, they will call it anti-Islamic/blasphemic, and its supporters - blasphemers.
 
.
It is not really the scriptures. It is the deliberate misinterpretation of those Mullahs that are hellbent on suppressing the fairer sex. If you show them the technology that goes against their interests, they will call it anti-Islamic/blasphemic, and its supporters - blasphemers.

Sir most Ulemas don't agree with some technology one the basis of logic and Quran and Hadees for example TV it can be used to portray Islam as well as promote Vulgarity but as for the Rape Islam doesn't require 4 witness for Rape
 
.
Sir no where in Shariah is said that Rape Requires 4 witness most Ulemas agree to it Saudi Arabia doesn't ask for 4 witness

This is what a Blog states:

“Why did they not produce four witnesses? Since they produce not witnesses, they verily are liars in the sight of Allah” (Qur’an 24:13; see also 24:4 and Bukhari, vol. 3, book 52, no. 2661).

Islam and Christianity: Rape and Islamic Sharia

I am not sure and that is why I asked because this blog is quoting passages.

There are other places also.

I might as well add that this is what they non Muslim are told.

In fact, in this very forum long time back, IIRC, there was a debate on this very issue.

I don't remember what was the opinion held.

I can only say that many of us get confused and don't know which is the exact position on the issue.

What is the opinion of the Sharia Courts in Pakistan.

It will give us an idea.
 
. .
This is what a Blog states:



Islam and Christianity: Rape and Islamic Sharia

I am not sure and that is why I asked because this blog is quoting passages.

There are other places also.

I might as well add that this is what they non Muslim are told.

Can't talk much about a blog's authenticity, but this is what I say: The requirement of 4 witnesses is for adultery, which is, although different from rape, is often misinterpreted (on purpose) as rape.

Secondly, if four witnesses are required to report a rape, then would the four witnesses just watching the rape happening would not become partners in crime for just watching and not helping the woman while she got raped? That, kind of, defeats logic.



To add to this... If a woman/man commits adultery, the onus to provide four witnesses is on the accuser. When this part is illegitimately shoved into the rape law, the victim becomes the accuser and she bears the onus of producing four witnesses.
 
.
Can't talk much about a blog's authenticity, but this is what I say: The requirement of 4 witnesses is for adultery, which is, although different from rape, is often misinterpreted (on purpose) as rape.

Secondly, if four witnesses are required to report a rape, then would the four witnesses just watching the rape happening would not become partners in crime for just watching and not helping the woman while she got raped? That, kind of, defeats logic.
Yes Rape does not require 4 witness Consent sex and adultery requires 4 witness
 
.
Can't talk much about a blog's authenticity, but this is what I say: The requirement of 4 witnesses is for adultery, which is, although different from rape, is often misinterpreted (on purpose) as rape.

Secondly, if four witnesses are required to report a rape, then would the four witnesses just watching the rape happening would not become partners in crime for just watching and not helping the woman while she got raped? That, kind of, defeats logic.

So if a person cheats on his/her spouse you need 4 witnesses to prove it?? That interpretation is actually in favor of women who may be falsely branded as adulterers. To see it misinterpreted and used in the way it is is really sad.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom