What's new

Yogi Adityanath: 'Muslims did no favour to India by staying here'

Don't support BJP then.
Pule, you are cute.

Congress is the main reason for more issues in India. They were in central for more than 50 years after independence but they actually failed.

Last time, 2004 to 2014 - totally wasted by UPA government
 
.
He is a comparable to yogi and pragya thakur for me.

Pls don't insult Socialism word by quoting him.

Many other good and qualified people are in India for PM post.

Congress will never RIP-Off Gandhi family and many other good people in Congress but feel sad for them.
Criticize Yogi and other extremist BJP leaders so Modi looks good and more acceptable in comparison. Nice psychological trick, bhaisahab!

Shaka IT cell has upped it's game hehe
 
Last edited:
.
Criticize Yogi and other extremist BJP leaders so Modi looks good and more acceptable in comparison. Nice psychological trick, bhaisahab!

Shaka IT cell has upped it's game hehe

I am new but I can say that you are just trolling India and not more than.

So thank you...
 
.
He is right!
But this is not the right platform to discuss such issues. Pakistanis share blood and religious ties with Indian Muslims.

Such discussions will offend them

It doesn't offend. Pakistan is too ethnically diverse to be offended.

Indian Muslims chose to remain in India which was their right. They shouldn't complain now.
 
.
Congress is the main reason for more issues in India. They were in central for more than 50 years after independence but they actually failed.

Last time, 2004 to 2014 - totally wasted by UPA government
And what makes you say that congress is failed?
 
.
“ I didn’t know him, he knew me” - a mourner standing as the casket of FDR was being drawn across the streets of the DC

Jinnah understood the future of the Muslims in India....
 
.
And what makes you say that congress is failed?
Did you miss the last elections ?

upload_2020-2-5_23-49-34.jpeg


^and that is still the collective Indian consciousness, don't bother with what we're up to in our regional elections.
 
.
This is the main problem and Indian Muslims cannot decipher it, seems as though. The more they adhere to being the 'difference' with a different culture, traditions, food, own language, own Muslim customs and above all the religion, the more otherised they become...

It is kind of double edged, the more Indian Muslims starts owing Hindustan, calling it their own country with a Millennium of history of Mughals, from Biryani to Sherwani, from Urdu to Ghazals, from owning Tehzeeb to celebrating Eids, from donning Kameez to Ghararas and loving/caring/owning all the Tehzeeb of Muslim Millennium of Hindustan, and this cultural superiority/traditional difference is the thing why Hindu hatred is showing in full light.

If Muslims of India stops doing, donning, celebrating, owning and relishing all the things mentioned above that make them(Muslims) appear different, and starts living as marginalized and at the fringe, ghettoized second class citizens, like Dalits, Hindus have no qualms about it. It is their owning of India which bothers them.

The reason Hindus will still show hatred to Indian Muslims who shows their complete loyalty to India, which they have to prove time and over again, this is a double jeopardy for them. And Indian Muslims don't understand and realise it...it is not about owning India it is about disowning the Muslim millenia and India(you are just tenants kind of thought)...this is what I realized and gathered.

@jamahir

@SIPRA
Unfortunately, even the absolute subjugation under the Hindus on a Permanent Settlement basis is no guarantee for these Muslims who hate to grab the rough butt of the sword!!! No wonder they are always at the sword’s sharp receiving end....
 
. .
He is right!
But this is not the right platform to discuss such issues. Pakistanis share blood and religious ties with Indian Muslims.

Such discussions will offend them
We share nothing at all with Indian Muslims.. We have punjabi, balochi, sindhi, phustoon, siraiki, hazara, gilgiti, balti, kahsmiri and other ethnicities, except for punjabi (which are Sikhs in Indian punjab). We share no ethnicity with India. They have no toes whatsoever. Of they wanted a merged with Pakistan come with their state. What has a hyderbadi or behari or keralite Muslim has to do with pakistan?
Nothing. Partition is done. They along with their land choose India. We already accommodated more Indians during partiton.
 
.
Jinnah made Pakistan out of those areas where Muslims were already overwhelming majority in excess of 80% i.e West and east Pakistan.
And by doing that he made Muslims of India who were minority in their regions even more weak and vulnerable and always looked with suspicion for partition of India and creation of Pakistan. In United India, muslims would have roughly equal hindu population by now.

Thanks to secular leader like Nerhu who kept the menace of Hindu rightwing at bay for so many decades, that gave muslims chance to grow in India, otherwise after partition after Pakistan became Islamic republic, India easily would have been a Hindu state which it has not become so far.
The Muslims in India have long gone below the Dalits in socio-economic aspects as per the Indian official reports. Now, even it looks too much....
 
.
You are new to this forum.

I have made posts on this topic several times. Pakistani members get emotional when their brothers in India are criticized.

Jains dominate business sector. Sikhs dominate agriculture and military. Christians dominate health and education sector.

Even few thousands Parsi left in India contribute more to Indian economy than Muslims.

I hope you understand. And let this topic die before Pakistani members feel bad.

So is it the fault of muslims if there contribution is low or is it fault of state for failing to provide them opportunities? It only proves the point that muslims in india are marginalized and hence require another separate state.
 
.
He is right!
But this is not the right platform to discuss such issues. Pakistanis share blood and religious ties with Indian Muslims.

Such discussions will offend them
You're playing your hand early Mr Pila.

Re: OP, I would have thought India has done Muslims no "favours" by "allowing" them to be citizens. Many Indian Muslims feel that Indian history is their history. Modi, Yogi and perhaps even you simply wish to disassociate Muslims from Indian history.

This is unfortunately what happens when you fall for your own propaganda. Indian Muslims built India into a superpower hundreds of years ago. India has not yet attained that status again. The sooner the rest of India swallows this bitter pill, the sooner your nation will find peace.
 
.
You're playing your hand early Mr Pila.

Re: OP, I would have thought India has done Muslims no "favours" by "allowing" them to be citizens. Many Indian Muslims feel that Indian history is their history. Modi, Yogi and perhaps even you simply wish to disassociate Muslims from Indian history.

This is unfortunately what happens when you fall for your own propaganda. Indian Muslims built India into a superpower hundreds of years ago. India has not yet attained that status again. The sooner the rest of India swallows this bitter pill, the sooner your nation will find peace.
what?? muslim superpower .:laughcry:
mate you make me laugh all the time , keep it up though.
You mean mughals made INDIA superpower ??
Didn't the mighty mughals vanished in just 27 years ,By the hands of the maratha confedracy .
that led to today's hindu INDIA. was that easy for maratha's to destroy the 1000 year ruling mughal superpowers,
and when you come against me come with history , that would be appreciated,:big_boss:
 
.
Yogi Adityanath: 'Muslims did no favour to India by staying here'
  • 5 February 2020

_110781986_gettyimages-1142508433.jpg
Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Muslims who chose to stay in India when it was partitioned following independence from Britain did the country "no favours", Yogi Adityanath, one of India's most controversial right-wing politicians, has said.

"They should have opposed partition, which led to the formation of Pakistan," he told BBC Hindi's Nitin Srivastava in an exclusive interview.

Mr Adityanath is the chief minister of the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, India's most populous state and home to nearly a quarter of India's 200 million Muslims. He is also a top leader in the governing Bharatiya Janata Party, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

His government has recently been accused of using excessive force against protesters, especially Muslims, opposing a contentious new citizenship law. But Mr Adityanath has denied these widespread allegations, even though they have been backed by compelling evidence.

The 47-year-old, saffron-robed, head priest of an influential Hindu temple is no stranger to controversy - he has made headlines for his hardline rhetoric, often directed against Muslims.

His comments appear to have intensified amid anti-government protests spurred by the citizenship law, known as the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).

_110777422_gettyimages-1129399248.jpg
Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionMr Adityanath (R) is a close ally of PM Modi
It offers amnesty to non-Muslim illegal immigrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. It has been criticised for targeting Muslims, but Mr Modi's government insists it does no such thing, and only seeks to indentify unauthorised immigrants.

But the law sparked massive protests in December, including large sit-in demonstrations, some of which are still continuing. The most notable of these is in Delhi's Shaheen Bagh, where hundreds of Muslim women have been camped out in protest for more than a month now.

In a veiled reference to the protesters in Shaheen Bagh, the chief minister told the BBC: "Men of a particular community, who are cowards, are sitting in their quilts and sending women and children out of their homes to protest against this law."

While accepting that "everyone has the right to peacefully protest in India", he claimed that the protest in Shaheen Bagh was "not peaceful, and was causing trouble to commuters and residents".

p0815xcx.jpg


Media captionThree generations of one family join women camped out in a Delhi suburb in protest against the citizenship law
The protest has been peaceful, but its location on one of Delhi's biggest roads has led to traffic snarls, although demonstrators allow emergency vehicles to pass through.

But this is not the first time Mr Adiyanath has spoken put against the protests in Shaheen Bagh.

During the interview, he repeated an accusation he has levelled against Arvind Kejriwal, the chief minister of the national capital, Delhi: that he "feeds hundreds of protesting women and children biryani", a popular rice-based dish that's associated with Muslim cuisine.

_110777446_gettyimages-1196483004.jpg
Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionThe citizenship law has sparked huge protests
This is a claim he has made while campaigning for this Saturday's state election in Delhi, where he has invoked "Hindu nationalistic pride", while ridiculing neighbouring Pakistan.

Mr Kejrwal, a fierce critic of the BJP and Mr Modi, is up for re-election. His party won an emphatic victory in 2015, defeating all opposition, including the BJP.

"We aren't the biryani-eating people", Mr Adityanath has said on the campaign trail, adding that after becoming PM, Mr Modi has been "shooting terrorists with bullets rather than giving them biryani."

He told the BBC he stood by this statement.

The protests against the CAA saw hundreds injured, and many even died amid violent clashes with police. And protesters often accused the police of using excessive force against them.

p07z1zgp.jpg


Media caption'Our son was shot dead by police'
Nowhere have the allegations been more serious than in Mr Adityanath's Uttar Pradesh, where at least 19 people died in the protests.

There have been numerous of reports of intimidation and threats against Muslims - videos from Kanpur city show policemen allegedly vandalising cars and homes in Muslim-populated areas. Thousands, mostly Muslim men, were detained across the state. The BBC reported on similar incidents in other cities.

Mr Adityanath justified the firing against "violent protesters", while denying allegations of police using force against peaceful protesters. He said, "armed, rampaging mobs were dealt with by the police when they started damaging public property".

_110777424_gettyimages-1189741753.jpg
Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionPolice in Uttar Pradesh have been accused of using excessive force by protesters
Asked if he would order action against protesters again, he said, "Yes, if they damage public property in the garb of opposing a law, which is non-discriminatory."

His government has also been accused of a series of extra-judicial killings since Mr Adityanath came to power in March 2017 - a charge he denied.

"There have been no [such] killings", he said. "People opposing me have been spreading false rumours but my administration is running superbly. The truth will be out soon."

 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom