How can they release the Video Footage of their Phuss Bum....
Kid does video makes you feel good, my advice rely on the data obtain from the seismic reading and watch hollywood movie for such video.
Here is what
Wikeleaks reports says
Technical Aspects of Pakistan's Nuclear Testing
All evidence points to Pakistan's nuclear weapons program being smaller and less
ambitious than that of India.Pakistan reportedly used a simple weapon design based
on enriched uranium, which is said to be a less sophisticated approach than one based
on plutonium, such as India uses.Abdul Qadeer Khan, the head of Pakistan's
nuclear program and the "father" of its atomic bomb, said, "None of these explosions
[of May 28 and 30] were thermonuclear ... We are doing research and can do a fusion
blast, if asked." There are few, if any, other references to a Pakistani fusion, or
hydrogen, bomb program, and the impl ication that Pakistan could detonate a
hydrogen bomb soon seems doubtful.In contrast, India has done considerable work
toward a weapon of that type, as discussed above under "Technical Aspects of India's
Nuclear Testing."Note that a smaller program may suffice to meet Pakistan's
perceived strategic need of deterringIndia, while India, which sees China as a
potential threat to be deterred, may require a larger program.
By all accounts, Pakistan's weapons program relies extensively on foreign
technology. According to one source:
China ... provided blueprints for the bomb, as well as highly enriched
uranium, tritium, scientists and key components for a nuclear weapons
production complex, among other crucial tools. Without China's help,
Pakistan's bomb would not exist, said Gary Milhollin, a leading expert on
the spread of nuclear weapons. ...
Pakistan had obtained the plans from the Chinese Government in the
early 1980's.The bomb was simple and efficient, based on highly enriched
uranium, and it had been tested by the Chinese in 1966. United States
Government physicists built a model of the bomb and reported that it was
a virtually foolproof design. On May 28, 1998, Pakistan announced that it had conducted five underground
nuclear tests; it announced a sixth test on May 30.Yield estimates of the tests varied
widely.A.Q. Khan reportedly said one of the tests of May 28 had a yield of 30 to 35
kilotons, about twice that of the Hiroshima bomb. Samar Mobarik Mand, said to
be "the scientist who conducted Pakistan's nuclear test programme,"reportedly placed
the yield of the May 28 tests at 40 to 45 kilotons, and that of the May 30 test at 15
to 18 kilotons.
On the other hand, estimates based on seismic data placed the yield
of the May 28 tests at between eight and 15 kilotons.
U.S. officials reportedly "estimated the cumulative force of the Pakistani blast or blasts [of May 28] at between
2 kilotons and 12 kilotons, and most likely 6 kilotons ..." For the May 30 test, some
reports placed the yield between 12 and 18 kilotons, but the CIA was said to have
estimated the yield at between one and five kilotons. Seismic data indicated a yield
of between zero (no detectable signal) and one kiloton.
A later analysis by seismologist Terry Wallace placed the yield of the May 28 explosion (or explosions)
at 9 to 12 kt, and that of the May 30 explosion at 4 to 6 kt.
While Pakistani statements and seismic data agree that there was only one test
on May 30, the number held on May 28 is disputed. In early reports of May 28,
Pakistan claimed two or three tests. a number it quickly revised to five. U.S.
analysts questioned the higher number. "Instead of five, 'it appears at least two'
bombs were tested, said one U.S. intelligenceofficial..." Similarly, the New York
Times reported that "American intelligence officials said Pakistan had probably tested
only two weapons rather than the five announced."Wallace found seismic signals
that could correspond to two explosions, but discounts the plausibility of the second
one. Because the yield appearslower than announced, it is unclear if the devices
performed as intended. According to a press report, U.S. officials said that the
estimated yield of the Pakistani test or tests of May 28, put by that report at most
likely six kilotons, "isless than what U.S. intelligence experts had estimated as the
likely yield of even one of the principal bombs in Pakistan's arsenal, raising questions
about whether the device or devices exploded by Pakistan had performed as
expected." On the other hand, as noted above, the Chinese design is thought to be
"nearly foolproof." There are indications that the tests were of actual weapons, as distinct from test
devices.A.Q. Khan "described the devices tested as 'ready-to-fire warheads' that had
been miniaturized so they could fit onto Ghauri missiles..." He also indicated that
four of the five tests of May 28 were of low-yield tactical nuclear weapons.According to a press report, "Intelligence analysts believe a goal of the test [on May30] was to devise a bomb small enough to fit on a missile.Pakistan is believed to be close to that difficult goal.
so do we have enough moutains in KPK & baluchistan to shelter 20 crore Pakistanis during a N. war? 
