Yemen's Houthis say they fired missile at Saudi Aramco site in Jeddah

[raptor22]

everything that is happening in Yemen is terrible, and i was against the coalition war in Yemen. same way, i am also against the houthi, the loyal dogs of iran. you didnt send houthis, but you are the ones that gave them the sophisticated weaponry that they use. dictators? iranians want to talk about supporting dictators? assad in syria is a dictator, the people hate him long before the west started supported the revolution, but iran supports him, because it puts it geostrategic interests over what the people want. so dont talk the same anti-imperialistic bullshit that all iranians talk.

So as first step we have established that Houthis are Yemenis and Coalition war on Yemen is not acceptable .. the coalition of African mercenaries have surrendered one of poorest country on this planet imposed blockade and created humanitarian catastrophe by the help of external powers and razed Yemen infrastructure and so on to ground ...
Second thing is insulting Yemenis people ... calling them "Iran Loyal dogs" ... very nice of you ...
The truth is if Houthis didn't have support of Yemeni people they would not be able to stand against the entire coalition of several countries backed & armed with American, English, French modern lethal wepaons + intelligence + Air fulfilling + political support ...
It's nice to see a group supported by Iran could stand against all these countries and Iranian sophisticated weaponry could deter all of them ....

On dictators what I meant was western countries hypocrisy ... on one side they seek regime change in Iran under pretext of democracy and meanwhile have good relations with countries without any constitution let alone having ballot boxes and are dictators ...
On Assad being dictators or no ... well frankly none my business and it's up to Syrian people as we said in 2012~13:

"The plan envisaged a ceasefire followed by a national unity government and constitutional reform aimed at constraining presidential powers. Most importantly, there would then be presidential and legislative elections under UN supervision. The plan was the subject of several months of shuttle diplomacy between the Iranian foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, and his Turkish counterpart, Ahmet Davutoğlu, but it eventually collapsed over the future role of the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad.​

“We agreed on every detail, except a clause in the final phase of the plan which called for UN-monitored elections. Turkish leaders wanted Assad barred,” Zarif is quoted as saying in the report. “I noted that this should not be a concern in an internationally monitored election, particularly if, as Turkey holds, Assad has a dreadful record and a minority constituency. But Davutoğlu refused... and our efforts came to naught.”​

So Iran intention was holding an internationally monitored election no matter what is the outcome ... so no sir we don't support dictators but those whom attacked Syria neither were after democracy in Syria nor Syrian people right ....


Again on Yemen:

So we support Yemeni people you supprort invades supported by american ....

 

[PakistaniAtBahrain]

So as first step we have established that Houthis are Yemenis and Coalition war on Yemen is not acceptable .. the coalition of African mercenaries have surrendered one of poorest country on this planet imposed blockade and created humanitarian catastrophe by the help of external powers and razed Yemen infrastructure and so on to ground ...
Second thing is insulting Yemenis people ... calling them "Iran Loyal dogs" ... very nice of you ...
The truth is if Houthis didn't have support of Yemeni people they would not be able to stand against the entire coalition of several countries backed & armed with American, English, French modern lethal wepaons + intelligence + Air fulfilling + political support ...
It's nice to see a group supported by Iran could stand against all these countries and Iranian sophisticated weaponry could deter all of them ....

On dictators what I meant was western countries hypocrisy ... on one side they seek regime change in Iran under pretext of democracy and meanwhile have good relations with countries without any constitution let alone having ballot boxes and are dictators ...
On Assad being dictators or no ... well frankly none my business and it's up to Syrian people as we said in 2012~13:

"The plan envisaged a ceasefire followed by a national unity government and constitutional reform aimed at constraining presidential powers. Most importantly, there would then be presidential and legislative elections under UN supervision. The plan was the subject of several months of shuttle diplomacy between the Iranian foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, and his Turkish counterpart, Ahmet Davutoğlu, but it eventually collapsed over the future role of the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad.​

“We agreed on every detail, except a clause in the final phase of the plan which called for UN-monitored elections. Turkish leaders wanted Assad barred,” Zarif is quoted as saying in the report. “I noted that this should not be a concern in an internationally monitored election, particularly if, as Turkey holds, Assad has a dreadful record and a minority constituency. But Davutoğlu refused... and our efforts came to naught.”​

So Iran intention was holding an internationally monitored election no matter what is the outcome ... so no sir we don't support dictators but those whom attacked Syria neither were after democracy in Syria nor Syrian people right ....


Again on Yemen:

So we support Yemeni people you supprort invades supported by american ....

you wrote a lot. i am just going to talk generally. i dont support the coalition actions in Yemen, but Iran is making it worse. the houthis are loyal dogs, they will keep doing iran's bidding after the war ends. this headache wont end here. iran has long used shia populations in arab countries to fight, and that is because iran is an imperialist state. Bashar is an animal. he would not have given up power easily, he had to go. you guys curse the shah and loads of other people who a lot less blood of their own people than bashar. everyone could see through iran's schemes and knew it was going to get bashar reelected or have some power one way or another. there is a reason nobody trusts iran. maybe its time your country looks in the mirror, but a true iranian would never do that. a true iranian is just going to cry the whole world is after them and secretly plan to control every country that has a significant shia population. it does that in syria, iraq, lebanon, has designs on bahrain, etc.

 

[waz]

Leave the personal insults out, don't insult an entire nation and it's people.
Or it's thread bans.
Thank you.