More than enough to escort commercial ships against pirates.
Oh, no doubt, it's a fine vessel.
Admiral James Stavridis is a retired US navy officer and he had said a deadly confrontation will be coming with Iran very soon, most likely before the election if not shortly after.
You guys would have to search google for it since I can't post links.
What are you guy's thoughts on this?
James Stavridis, Retired Admiral, Is Being Vetted as Hillary Clinton’s Running Mate
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/13/u...idis-hillary-clinton-vice-president.html?_r=0
In response:
“Well, let’s put it this way Brian, first of all you met me, on a good day I stand about 5 foot five and when they called me up and said hey, you are on the short list, I thought, you must be talking about my height. The other problem I have is it’s very tough to get Stavridis to fit on a bumper sticker. I think beyond any of that you should probably give the Clinton campaign and ask… I have never thought about a political career and I am quite happy at where I am at the moment”
—Admiral Stavridis on being vetted by Hillary Clinton for vice president
http://radio.foxnews.com/2016/07/19...vetted-by-hillary-clinton-for-vice-president/
Biography
http://www.usni.org/selected-writings-admiral-james-g-stavridis-us-navy
Admiral James Stavridis (Ret): A Deadly Confrontation Is Coming With Iran, If Not Immediately Then After The Election
Oct 14, 2016
The next step in this is going to be the need to use deadly force against the Iranians. I think it’s coming, it’s going to be a maritime confrontation and if it doesn’t happen immediately, I’ll bet you a dollar it’s going to be happening after the presidential election, whoever is elected.”
—Admiral Stavridis on why a deadly confrontation with Iran is coming sooner or later
https://radio.foxnews.com/2016/10/1...n-if-not-immediately-then-after-the-election/
Earlier on:
Ret. Admiral Stavridis: ‘You Can Drive a Truck Through’ Holes in Iran Deal
July 29, 2015
Retired Admiral James Stavridis rejected key talking points used by the Obama administration to sell the Iran nuclear deal in an interview Wednesday.
Admiral Stavridis, who served as NATO Supreme Allied Commander and is now Dean of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, told MSNBC’s
Morning Joe the deal may not catch Iranian nuclear cheating if it occurs.
“I think the top [issue] is the verification regime, which is starting to roughly resemble Swiss cheese,” Stavridis said. “You can drive a truck through some of the holes. I am very concerned about that.”
Defenders of the deal, such as Secretary of State John Kerry, have insisted the deal’s verification measures are airtight.
Stavridis expressed concern over Iran’s side deal about inspections with the IAEA, which may allow Iran to take its own environmental samples from suspicious sites.
“We need to have access to it and understand it,” Stavridis said about the side deal. “Reportedly, it puts Iran in the position of actually procuring samples as opposed to having them taken by the IAEA.”
Stavridis said his biggest concern with the deal is its gift of hundreds of billions in economic activity and previously frozen assets to Iran, the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism.
“The biggest problem here is the airdrop of $100 to $150 billion into their economy, which is only $350 billion to begin with,” Stavridis said. “That’s like the U.S. getting a $4 trillion insertion of capital. That’s the teeth of the alligator you just heard about.”
Under the nuclear deal, Iran would gain access to foreign businesses and key financial networks, which will generate the steady revenue necessary to revitalize Iran’s military and allies.
Obama administration officials have said that the deal’s concessions to Iran are tolerable because the only alternative is a ground war.
Stavridis dismissed this rhetoric as a false choice.
“I think the U.S. still can drive some degree of sanctions” without a deal, Stavridis said. “There are cyber options to pursue. There are clandestine options to pursue. There are Special Forces options to pursue. I reject a notion that the choice is simply between this deal and going to war.”
The U.S. public is increasingly wary of the Iran nuclear deal as the congressional review period drags on. A CNN poll released Tuesday found that a majority of Americans want Congress to reject the deal.
http://freebeacon.com/national-secu...can-drive-a-truck-through-holes-in-iran-deal/