Xiaomi shows Arunachal is in India at handset launch, triggers anger in China

[Shotgunner51]

Yes, unfortunate though it may sound - this is true. I hope the people of Tibet get their emancipation some day. But even the Han invasion is not relevant to this thread.

You can hope whatever, and we will continue what we are doing.

Let's talk about how Xiaomi, PRC's number one mobile brand has decided to bet on India instead of PRC. Perhaps they have ears to the wall and have got wind of the dangers of a failing economy in the Chinese subcontinent.

You lack of knowledge is astounding, Xiaomi is not PRC's state-run brand, it is privately owned, shareholders diverse across a few nations incl China Russia, US, Singapore.

Yeah maybe they have ears to the wall, who knows right? BTW by your logic, what would you say about Carrefour's and Walmart's pullout of india?

 

[SarthakGanguly]

You lack of knowledge is astounding, Xiaomi is not PRC's state-run brand, it is privately owned, shareholders diverse across a few nations incl China Russia, US, Singapore.

Yeah maybe they have ears to the wall, who knows right? BTW by your logic, what would you say about Carrefour's and Walmart's pullout of india?

No, you are mistaken. I mean Xiaomi is PRC's numero uno brand of choice - as they claim, I admit. I am well aware of the fact that they are privately owned.

 

[magudi]

Xiaomi to set up R&D centre in Bangalore; will focus on India-specific products, says Manu Jain - Tech2

 

[Shotgunner51]

No, you are mistaken. I mean Xiaomi is PRC's numero uno brand of choice - as they claim, I admit. I am well aware of the fact that they are privately owned.

You were indeed unaware of this fact right? If that's the case I told you that's your lack of basic knowledge, which is fine, but if your argument is made base on false assumptions, then you invites an embarrassing insult on your very own intelligence.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

You were indeed unaware of this fact right? If that's the case I told you that's your lack of basic knowledge, which is fine, but if your argument is made base on false assumptions, then you invites an embarrassing insult on your very own intelligence.

Oh come on. Pls, its common sense. They mention Pvt Ltd very clearly. Besides, their showing Arunachal would have been a catastrophe. That is not the point.
My question is since they are the numero uno brand now in China, why are they dissing them off? Economically it makes no sense. Or does it?

 

[Shotgunner51]

Oh come on. Pls, its common sense. They mention Pvt Ltd very clearly. Besides, their showing Arunachal would have been a catastrophe. That is not the point.
My question is since they are the numero uno brand now in China, why are they dissing them off? Economically it makes no sense. Or does it?

No it's not common sense, just stupidity.

Pvt Ltd is just possible legal entity inside the whole legal structure of any enterprise, nothing says about nationality, what school did you go to?
What are the numero uno brand in india, say PC, say TV? indian common sense suggest they are indian owned?
For business decision of a private-owned company, I can't answer.
How do you explain Carrefour's and Walmart's pullout of india?

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Pvt Ltd is just possible legal entity inside the whole legal structure of any enterprise, nothing says about nationality, what school did you go to?
What are the numero uno brand in india, say PC, say TV? indian common sense suggest they are indian owned?
For business decision of a private-owned company, I can't answer.
How do you explain Carrefour's and Walmart's pullout of india?

What made you deduce that by Pvt Ltd I meant it states nationality? I am not getting you. Perhaps there is an acute IQ mismatch (mine is lower of course).

 

[sherin616]

Take aksai chin and give Arunachal Pradesh to india and live in peace

 

[Shotgunner51]

What made you deduce that by Pvt Ltd I meant it states nationality? I am not getting you. Perhaps there is an acute IQ mismatch (mine is lower of course).

Check the below sequence:

Post #202

Let's talk about how Xiaomi, PRC's number one mobile brand has decided to bet on India instead of PRC

Post #207

No, you are mistaken. I mean Xiaomi is PRC's numero uno brand of choice - as they claim, I admit. I am well aware of the fact that they are privately owned.

Post #210

Oh come on. Pls, its common sense. They mention Pvt Ltd very clearly

Post #202: You assume Xiaomi is a PRC mobile brand, while the fact is not.
Post #207: You said you are "aware" of Xiaomi's ownership
Post #210: You were "aware" of Xiaomi's ownership because they mention Pvt Ltd very clearly. Note that Pvt Ltd has nothing to do with nationality of a company, just a legal structure, you cannot tell whether it is or is it not a PRC brand.

Yes there is an acute mismatch in IQ. We have seen the statistics of IQ survey, it's not a disgrace, nothing wrong with it, just need helps to rectify the situation. However if being boastful while having low IQ, that's how it looks now.

 

[dray]

Is it your lack of knowledge or simply denial of fact? Labeling "backstabbing" in hind sight doesn't change the result of india's humiliating defeat.
India needs to revisit 1962 humiliation for catharsis - The Times of India
Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We han people live thousands of kilos away, took Tibet (which india wish to be a buffer state) in 1951, humiliated india in 1962, forced the line to LAC (Line of Actual Control) to within hundred of kilos to new delhi, gain de facto control of AC, and now claim an extra 90,000 sqm of prime and beautiful indian soil, that's how to humiliate india in a continuous fashion.

PRC's paper tiger army was humiliated like dirt by every nation, even with a 25:1 troop advantage and backstabber's advantage they did not have balls to hold on to the territory and ran away tucking their tails between their legs. We still own and continue to own 90,000 sq.km. of prime and beautiful land claimed by PRC and you can't do a jack about it, And we didn't have any post in Akshay Hind because that was a barren land, you didn't win anything, you just stole it when we were not there. And then in 1967 we took Sikkim by massacring the Chinese paper tigers, NOW THAT'S REAL HUMILIATION.

 

[Shotgunner51]

PRC's paper tiger army was humiliated like dirt by every nation, even with a 25:1 troop advantage and backstabber's advantage they did not have balls to hold on to the territory and ran away tucking their tails between their legs.

Labeling "backstabbing" to cover your incapability? Renaming ceasefire as "ran away"? Faking up "25:1" to save face? All your lack of knowledge or simply denial of fact? Doesn't change the result of india's humiliating defeat.

India needs to revisit 1962 humiliation for catharsis - The Times of India
Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We still own and continue to own 90,000 sq.km. of prime and beautiful land claimed by PRC and you can't do a jack about it, And we didn't have any post in Akshay Hind because that was a barren land, you didn't win anything, you just stole it when we were not there. And then in 1967 we took Sikkim by massacring the Chinese paper tigers, NOW THAT'S REAL HUMILIATION.

Keep labeling "paper tigers" cos that's what you can only boast about, while we han people live thousands of kilos away, since your British masters left we took Tibet (which india wish to be a buffer state) in 1951, humiliated india in 1962 by a decisive victory, forced the line to LAC (Line of Actual Control, tranverses 4 indian states jammu/kashimiri, uttarakhand, himachal, sikkim) to within hundred of kilos to new delhi, gain de facto control of AC (you can try take it back), and we now claim an extra 90,000 sqm of prime and beautiful indian soil to keep up the tension, that's how to humiliate india in a continuous fashion

 

[dray]

Labeling "backstabbing" to cover your incapability? Renaming ceasefire as "ran away"? Faking up "25:1" to save face? All your lack of knowledge or simply denial of fact? Doesn't change the result of india's humiliating defeat.

India needs to revisit 1962 humiliation for catharsis - The Times of India
Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Keep labeling "paper tigers" cos that's what you can only boast about, while we han people live thousands of kilos away, since your British masters left we took Tibet (which india wish to be a buffer state) in 1951, humiliated india in 1962 by a decisive victory, forced the line to LAC (Line of Actual Control, tranverses 4 indian states jammu/kashimiri, uttarakhand, himachal, sikkim) to within hundred of kilos to new delhi, gain de facto control of AC (you can try take it back), and we now claim an extra 90,000 sqm of prime and beautiful indian soil to keep up the tension, that's how to humiliate india in a continuous fashion

LOL paper tigers were subjugated by everybody else and they never won any war, now they are making up false stories. 1962 ended in a status quo, you didn't gain anything extra or pushed any line, you made some initial gains because at that time our China border was mostly unguarded, but your PLA declared ceasefire and ran away when Nehru finally decided to send reinforcements. IT WAS YOUR ARMY WHO DECLARED CEASEFIRE AND RAN AWAY TO AVOID A SURRENDER TO OUR REINFORCEMENTS.

 

[waz]

The thread is a mess. It will be locked for a clear up.