Xiaomi shows Arunachal is in India at handset launch, triggers anger in China

[AgniVI]

Ok then. We will take it, rather than leave it .

would love to kill any chinese crossing over to Tibet, come try your luck, India will bury you chinis in cold ones and for all.

 

[dray]

Of course you can make them. And chances are you will make them. But then they might just be distributed to the nascent states like Guanxi, Shanxi, Mengukkuo, Manchukuo, Xibei San Ma, Yunna. Not to mention historically non Chinese territories like Hong Kong, Macau, Tibet and Xinxiang.

Very true. Saved it for future use.

Yes, because the Earth-shaking leak of the Henderson-Brooks report was so insignificant that they didn't even bother checking their own copy to see if it was fake or not, right?

Right.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

LMAO, even Russia with a much smaller economy can maintain those nukes, so why China cannot sustain it?

Instead of overdone the number of the nuclear stockpile, we are focusing on the more advanced futuristic weapons.

You misunderstood me. You can build them. You have a lot of capacity. But you may have to share them later.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

@WebMaster @Horus @Chak Bamu @waz @Jungibaaz

I am quite sure that Two Nation Theory or the Azad Maidan riots have nothing to do with Xiaomi showing Arunachal Pradesh, nor does it have anything to do with 'anger in China'. This is an irrelevant troll-bait. Besides, this is an incitement to violence and demeaning to martyrs. Such graphic pictures should be discouraged, as per guidelines here.

You posted these pictures yourself yesterday.

Where do you think I got them from?

-------------

This is your post from yesterday:

Islamists have conquered that place.

These folks hate India more than anyone like Zarvan or Horus.









India has to decide whom it wants.

Are they only too graphic when I post them, but fine when you post them?

BTW the ones you posted are far more graphic. The ones I posted were not graphic at all.

Now I think you are trolling me on purpose. You are literally complaining about your own pictures.

 

[Shotgunner51]

Well you also have your share of utter humiliation when your "invincible" PLA literally got it's a$$ whooped in a brutal way by a supposedly "rag tag" Vietnamese Militia(lol,not even by the real V.P.A. as it was fighting a full fledged war at that time inside the Cambodian border)!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Vietnamese_War

Oh yeah sure Viets are bloody tough, french bleed, we bleed, the americans bleed, those guys were real tough, die first surrender later, real brave suckers ... hats off to their fighting spirit even as enemies ...

But humiliating indians ... LMAO? That's kid's play! Brits did that, we did that, 1962 was a fun ... ... Actually everyone can humiliate indians, piece of cake, not just weak but utterly coward, piss their pants, surrender then talk ...
But one thing no one can beat indians ... talking BS ... they talk big but act like chicken ...

 

[dray]

See, that doesn't offend me. Since the entire world, and mainstream history shows it to be false.

Whereas mainstream world history shows it was the British that created India.

That's why it bothers you. Because you (and everyone else) knows that it is true. All your border lines are named after British people.

The river you were named after is not even in India, just like it is not in the West Indies, or the land of the Red Indians, or anything else created by the British Empire that bears the name that is their trademark.

And the British were bad at drawing lines, like the MacMahon line (or the other Indian borders which were named and drawn by white British men).

See Sudan, they split recently. See Iraq and Syria, they are de facto partitioned as we speak (IS controls much of their territory).

Badly drawn British lines, the same reason why India split in 1947. Yet India still has the 2nd largest Muslim population in the world, so another partition is inevitable. Especially after Indian Hindus chose a mass murder of Muslims as their PM.

And the irony is that you believe it too.

As much as you guys like to argue against the Two Nation theory, it was the basis for your successful partition.



Keep wishing sir. We have survived over 2000 years as a state, and we have seen ups and downs like you could not imagine. But still we always end up reuniting.

I am not trying to offend you, why should I? I am just stating the facts, facts like the name 'China' was given by India.

However, you are going off-topic from the original issue that a Chinese company is ready to sacrifice Chinese integrity to sell some low-priced phones to Indians and earn some money.

 

[Rockstar]

"When in Rome do as Romans do"- This quote is applicable here very well

 

[dray]

Oh yeah sure Viets are bloody tough, french bleed, we bleed, the americans bleed, those guys were real tough, die first surrender later, real brave suckers ... hats off to their fighting spirit even as enemies ...

But humiliating indians ... LMAO? That's kid's play! Brits did that, we did that, 1962 was a fun ... ... Actually everyone can humiliate indians, piece of cake, not just weak but utterly coward, piss their pants, surrender then talk ...
But one thing no one can beat indians ... talking BS ... they talk big but act like chicken ...

Yeah, showing bravery by backstabbing and with 25:1 advantage in numbers. And when we decided to send troops chinese run away tucking their tails between their legs. Don't forget that we own 90,000 sq.km. of prime and beautiful land claimed by PRC and you can't do a jack about it, NOW THAT'S REAL HUMILIATION.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

I am not trying to offend you, why should I? I am just stating the facts, facts like the name 'China' was given by India.

However, you are going off-topic from the original issue that a Chinese company is ready to sacrifice Chinese integrity to sell some low-priced phones to Indians and earn some money.

China comes from the Chinese word Chin/Qin. It traveled through Asia before it reached the West, but the sound didn't change, the Europeans simply added an "a" at the end, which is very common in Latin based languages.

However, you are going off-topic from the original issue that a Chinese company is ready to sacrifice Chinese integrity to sell some low-priced phones to Indians and earn some money.

Am I supposed to be upset that we are making yet more money out of India?

India already has the most poverty in the world yet they are giving billions to us every year, they are the ones who should be upset. Indian businessmen prefer to order from China rather than their fellow Indians.

 

[dray]

You posted these pictures yourself yesterday.

Where do you think I got them from?

-------------

This is your post from yesterday:



Are they only too graphic when I post them, but fine when you post them?

BTW the ones you posted are far more graphic. The ones I posted were not graphic at all.

Now I think you are trolling me on purpose. You are literally complaining about your own pictures.

Those pictures are as irrelevant here as the pictures of Xinjiang massacre victims, you are posting irrelevant things here.

China comes from the Chinese word Chin/Qin. It traveled through Asia before it reached the West, but the sound didn't change, the Europeans simply added an "a" at the end, which is very common in Latin based languages.



Am I supposed to be upset that we are making yet more money out of India?

India already has the most poverty in the world yet they are giving billions to us every year, they are the ones who should be upset. Indian businessmen prefer to order from China rather than their fellow Indians.

It came from a Sanskrit word Chin.

And Indian poverty has reduced to less than 100 million, you need to update yourself.

 

[Shotgunner51]

Yeah, showing bravery by backstabbing and with 25:1 advantage in numbers. And when we decided to send troops chinese run away tucking their tails between their legs.

Is it your lack of knowledge or simply denial of fact? Labeling "backstabbing" in hind sight doesn't change the result of india's humiliating defeat.
India needs to revisit 1962 humiliation for catharsis - The Times of India
Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Don't forget that we own 90,000 sq.km. of prime and beautiful land claimed by PRC and you can't do a jack about it, NOW THAT'S REAL HUMILIATION

We han people live thousands of kilos away, took Tibet (which india wish to be a buffer state) in 1951, humiliated india in 1962, forced the line to LAC (Line of Actual Control) to within hundred of kilos to new delhi, gain de facto control of AC, and now claim an extra 90,000 sqm of prime and beautiful indian soil, that's how to humiliate india in a continuous fashion.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

We han people live thousands of kilos away, took Tibet

Yes, unfortunate though it may sound - this is true. I hope the people of Tibet get their emancipation some day. But even the Han invasion is not relevant to this thread. Let's talk about how Xiaomi, PRC's number one mobile brand has decided to bet on India instead of PRC. Perhaps they have ears to the wall and have got wind of the dangers of a failing economy in the Chinese subcontinent.

 

[Yogijaat]

Indian civilization is one of the oldest on this planet, but modern China was created by Mongols and Manchus by defeating and subjugating the Han Chinese. Mongolia should reclaim its historical territory.

have you watched any chinese movie? If you have than you should have noticed that all the bad guys in their movies has ponytails @Chinese-Dragon could you explain the reason for this? or @Shotgunner51

 

[SarthakGanguly]

It came from a Sanskrit word Chin.

True. In fact that itself does not encompass all of the territory currently held by PRC. The ancient borders were around the Great Wall of China.

In any case, how was Xiaomi doing in the Chinese subcontinent?

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Yes, unfortunate though it may sound - this is true. I hope the people of Tibet get their emancipation some day. But even the Han invasion is not relevant to this thread. Let's talk about how Xiaomi, PRC's number one mobile brand has decided to bet on India instead of PRC. Perhaps they have ears to the wall and have got wind of the dangers of a failing economy in the Chinese subcontinent.

Or maybe they just like the idea of taking yet more money out of India.

As if India's enormous trade deficit to China every year was not enough.