What's new

WW3 Iran Pakistan and The Nuclear Terrorists

Like i said if these are spreaded over then they cannot be sold by some single person.It would require a lot of people's involvement and any Person who dare do such a thing will be killed in mutiny by Patriotic People inside the Government.

What nonsense. Our air space is used by the US forces to humiliate us in the form of drone attacks. Even airbases have been occupied by the US forces with the consent of Pakistan. Our president is the most corrupt ever. Who is going to protect us? Is our army only trained to respond to the Indians?
 
.
Iranians must be watching the ongoing US-Pak escalation with great interest! Almost salivating.
 
.
Iran can prove Bin Laden was dead long before US raid – Iranian minister
Published: 10 May, 2011, 17:07
Iranian Intelligence Minister Heydar Moslehi claims that Osama Bin Laden died from an illness before the US raid on his compound in Abbottabad. Iran has documents to prove it, he said.
"We have credible information that Bin Laden died some time ago of a disease," Moslehi said on the sidelines of a cabinet meeting on Sunday, as quoted by ISNA news agency.

"If the US military and intelligence apparatus have really arrested or killed Bin Laden, why don't they show him [his body]? Why have they thrown his corpse into the sea?" Moslehi asked rhetorically, FARS news agency reports.

Moslehi labeled the US raid in Abbottabad as a “PR campaign”, created to divert the attention of its citizens from domestic problems, such as the “fragile” state of the US economy.

"We believe that what the US is seeking, by dictated media programs, to overshadow the recent awakening in the region through the release of such reports," ISNA quoted Moslehi as saying.

Bin Laden was killed on May 2 in the Pakistani town of Abbottabad, north of the capital Islamabad, during a special operation carried out by US Navy Seals. President Barack Obama announced the news in a special address to the nation.

The news of “justice having been done” sparked mass celebrations in the United States and then ignited a new wave of conspiracy theories after Washington refused to release Bin Laden’s postmortem photographs, claiming that they might instigate a new wave of radicalism.

I mean we obviously knew the USA was lying but yeah...

https://rt.com/news/osama-dead-raid/
 
.
Do not expand Afghan war, Iran tells US

golinejad20110509232818250.jpg


Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has warned US President Barack Obama against extending the war in Afghanistan to neighboring Pakistan.


“I warn Mr. Obama to take a lesson from [former President George W.] Bush's fate and to stop expanding the war. The best option for him is to withdraw his forces from our region,” Ahmadinejad said on Monday.

The Iranian president made the comments at a news conference in Istanbul on the sidelines of the Fourth UN Conference on the Least Developed Countries.

“If he (Obama) makes a wrong decision, he will suffer an even worse fate than that of Bush,” Ahmadinejad added.

He went on to say that the US invaded the region after the 9/11 attacks under the pretext of the campaign against terrorism, but there has never been an independent investigation into the events.

The Iranian president also underlined the need to reform the UN structure, noting that the nations of the world have come to the conclusion that the UN must be reformed since the major powers currently control it.

The five-day UN summit with 48 leaders of the world's Least Developed Countries (LDCs) began in Istanbul on Monday to discuss a new 10-year aid plan to help lift nations out of poverty.

At the UN conference, the Iranian president presented Iran's six-point plan for reforming the 'unjust' world system.

The UN holds a Least Developed Countries conference every decade. France hosted the first two LDC conferences in 1981 and 1990. The third was held in Brussels in 2001.

PressTV - Do not expand Afghan war, Iran tells US
 
.
Pakistan's nukes can hit Israel, & China's nukes can also hit the most of the US. We all know how much United States is aligned with Israel. So I don't think there will be an all out nuclear war.

Quetta-Tel Aviv are 3065 km (1904.5 miles) apart. Pakistan's Hatf5 (Ghauri 3) has a range of 3500 km

MissileThreat :: Hatf 5 (Ghauri-3)

Beijing-Los Angeles are 10060 km (6251 miles) apart. China's DF-5 has a range of 13000-15000 km

DF-5 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
Pakistan's nukes can hit Israel, & China's nukes can also hit the most of the US. We all know how much United States is aligned with Israel. So I don't think there will be an all out nuclear war.

Quetta-Tel Aviv are 3065 km (1904.5 miles) apart. Pakistan's Hatf5 (Ghauri 3) has a range of 3500 km

MissileThreat :: Hatf 5 (Ghauri-3)

Beijing-Los Angeles are 10060 km (6251 miles) apart. China's DF-5 has a range of 13000-15000 km

DF-5 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The question is does Pakistan have the courage to use the nukes as a deterrent? The nukes are effective deterrent so long a state is willing to use them if the situation calls for. If the political leaders do not have the stomach to use them then they are of no use at all.
 
.
The question is does Pakistan have the courage to use the nukes as a deterrent? The nukes are effective deterrent so long a state is willing to use it them if the situation calls for. If the political leaders do not have the stomach to use them then they are no deterrent at all.

It is deterrent until used. Once it is used, an open invitation to play off with similar bombs on your own Territory with its citizens as its fielder. Nuclear is for fear and not for use.
 
.
Nuclear is for fear and not for use.


If your adversary knows that you are to afraid to use it the 'fear' disappears and it loses its effectiveness as a deterrent.
 
.
It is deterrent until used. Once it is used, an open invitation to play off with similar bombs on your own Territory with its citizens as its fielder. Nuclear is for fear and not for use.


yes, nuclear is for fear and not for use until we have no other option left to stop the enemy. .
 
.
If your adversary knows that you are to afraid to use it the 'fear' disappears and it loses its effectiveness as a deterrent.

The US is also a signatory of the NPT, Pakistan isn't. The nukes serve as a deterrent, not for use.
 
.
The Nukes are a legit target(for the west)..
If one was to play a little liberally on "the bigger game".. which slips in and out of conspiracy land...
then the nukes are "available" for the protection of the Saudi Arabian land.. against which aggressor??
well I suppose the only undeclared nuclear power.. with more nukes than us..

More importantly though.. it is the fear of these nukes that keeps the hawks in India at bay..
take them away.. and even the tiniest squeak in India will lead to a full blown attack by them..
since they wont fear a nuclear reprisal.. they will be confident of victory.

The PALS system offered to us.. would have given the US the ability to remotely lock our weapons away..
that was not allowed thanks to the people that matter in the NSC and the SPD.

Like it or not.. the "castration" of Pakistan is on the US agenda.. and it will happen.. with us staring at each other like idiots when it does.
 
. .
The Nukes are a legit target(for the west)..
If one was to play a little liberally on "the bigger game".. which slips in and out of conspiracy land...
then the nukes are "available" for the protection of the Saudi Arabian land.. against which aggressor??
well I suppose the only undeclared nuclear power.. with more nukes than us..

More importantly though.. it is the fear of these nukes that keeps the hawks in India at bay..
take them away.. and even the tiniest squeak in India will lead to a full blown attack by them..
since they wont fear a nuclear reprisal.. they will be confident of victory.

The PALS system offered to us.. would have given the US the ability to remotely lock our weapons away..
that was not allowed thanks to the people that matter in the NSC and the SPD.

Like it or not.. the "castration" of Pakistan is on the US agenda.. and it will happen.. with us staring at each other like idiots when it does.

This is some utopin theory, India will not engage in a war with a Nuclear or Non Nuclear Pakistan. Its not your nuclear arsenal that keeps our army from occupying your land, its the respect for your soverinity that keeps us from occupying your land. Remember 1971, we had captured Lahor, yet we withdrew because once the war was over we showed the world that we are not interested in your land. and please do not say that Indians initiated the 1971 war, it was your blunder to have not handed over power to east Pakistan Mujbur Rehmans party as they have had a clean victory in the 1970 Pakistan election. Your ill behavior towards east Pakistan and the subsequent mass migration of east pakistanis into india led to the war.
 
.
This is some utopin theory, India will not engage in a war with a Nuclear or Non Nuclear Pakistan. Its not your nuclear arsenal that keeps our army from occupying your land, its the respect for your soverinity that keeps us from occupying your land. Remember 1971, we had captured Lahor, yet we withdrew because once the war was over we showed the world that we are not interested in your land. and please do not say that Indians initiated the 1971 war, it was your blunder to have not handed over power to east Pakistan Mujbur Rehmans party as they have had a clean victory in the 1970 Pakistan election. Your ill behavior towards east Pakistan and the subsequent mass migration of east pakistanis into india led to the war.

you gone crazy? in 1971 no one captured Lahore, go and learn history son, Lahore was not captured by you people in any war....
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom