Far less effective though. And aircraft can be used again and againDrones are far cheaper to produce, fly, maintain and replace then Aircraft. So drones are a good investment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Far less effective though. And aircraft can be used again and againDrones are far cheaper to produce, fly, maintain and replace then Aircraft. So drones are a good investment.
They both have different roles for different situations.Far less effective though. And aircraft can be used again and again
Seems like that's working well with Russia. Ironically what would be more effective in Ukraine, Suicide UAS? or traditional aircraft in the current situation?Far less effective though. And aircraft can be used again and again
The Russians are in completely different situation. There tactical airpower has been badly blunted due to massive support from the west.Seems like that's working well with Russia. Ironically what would be more effective in Ukraine, Suicide UAS? or traditional aircraft in the current situation?
Suicide UAS doesn't replace traditional aircraft, it serves as a compliment.
Seems like that's working well with Russia. Ironically what would be more effective in Ukraine, Suicide UAS? or traditional aircraft in the current situation?
Suicide UAS doesn't replace traditional aircraft, it serves as a compliment.
maybe simply because Russian doesn't need our helps, there are some deeply mistrust from Russian side on every level, they always talked about how we might taken far east back blah blah.You sir, are talking about politicians.
PLA still is the same brave force that it used to be.
Well if NATO manage to get rid of the bear then next target is the loong, the lion is already in the game.maybe simply because Russian doesn't need our helps, there are some deeply mistrust from Russian side on every level, they always talked about how we might taken far east back blah blah.
The Russians are in completely different situation. There tactical airpower has been badly blunted due to massive support from the west.
We aren't likely to ever be in the same predicament. \We will either fight COIN/IS duty like the last fifteen years or will be fighting a Nuclear armed near peer, where again such weapons won't be much use.
I see I didn't realize you were refering to that. Of course Tac air is 100% more efficient/effective in such case.Please dont compare the security situation at Pakistan's borders with western backed Ukrainian Army. A sortie of fighter jets is more efficient at targeting and taking out rag tag rebels than having to deal with sophisticated AD network that Ukraine has.
This is not some child's play. Russians know the weight China carries and they know their own strength. They need the help from Chinese but not the type that many lay people imagine, particularly those who are fond of dick size competition.maybe simply because Russian doesn't need our helps, there are some deeply mistrust from Russian side on every level, they always talked about how we might taken far east back blah blah.
China will catch up in 15 year max I would guess.well by the rate china fleet expanding , wonder how much longer USN fleet will be dominant fleet in pacific ocean
I believe less than 10China will catch up in 15 year max I would guess.
Depends on the types of drones...most drones are reusable and very very cost effective compared to fighter jets. However kamikaze drones are designed as loitering munitions. That's their purposeFar less effective though. And aircraft can be used again and again
You are worried about the wrong things bro. What happened to our space agency? Our space agency is a national disgrace. A budget of only 30 million USD and led by a major general lmao...Have u noticed nothing and no info from pakistans drone program. I guess all put to sleep