World's most prolific reproductive people?

[xyxmt]

Hmmmm.

Have you heard of Tinder? Does it really work?? Or is it all beer fueled farts?

online is all beer fueled farts and fat pigs, go offline, you gotta show bling bling

 

[Tom M]

As a rule of the thumb the poorer communities throughout history tend to have more children as compared to groups that are financially well of. Maybe because the poor always fear for their safety and try to find safety in numbers.

An additional member means an extra bread earner in future, that's only what they think.

 

[TruthSeeker]

From the CIA World Factbook: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2054rank.html

COUNTRY COMPARISON :: BIRTH RATE
Birth rate compares the average annual number of births during a year per 1,000 persons in the population at midyear; also known as crude birth rate.

Nation Births per 1000 Population
1 Niger 44.80
2 Mali 44.40
3 Uganda 43.40
4 Zambia 41.80
5 Burundi 41.70
6 Burkina Faso 41.60
7 Malawi 41.30
8 Somalia 40.00
9 Angola 38.60
10 Mozambique 38.30
11 Afghanistan 38.30
12 Nigeria 37.30
13 Ethiopia 36.90
14 Sierra Leone 36.70
15 South Sudan 36.20
16 Chad 36.10
17 Tanzania 36.00
18 Cameroon 35.80
19 Benin 35.50
20 Guinea 35.40
21 Congo, Republic of the 35.10
22 Central African Republic 34.70
23 Gabon 34.30
24 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 34.20
25 Senegal 34.00
26 Liberia 33.90
27 Timor-Leste 33.80
28 Togo 33.70
29 Sao Tome and Principe 33.30
30 Rwanda 33.30
31 Guinea-Bissau 32.90
32 Equatorial Guinea 32.80
33 Gaza Strip 32.30
34 Madagascar 32.10
35 Zimbabwe 31.90
36 Iraq 30.90
37 Mauritania 30.90
38 Ghana 30.80
39 Egypt 30.30
40 Eritrea 30.10
41 Gambia, The 30.10
42 Western Sahara 29.80
43 Yemen 29.20
44 Sudan 28.50
45 Cote d'Ivoire 28.20
46 Namibia 27.90
47 Comoros 26.90
48 West Bank 26.70
49 Jordan 25.50
50 Solomon Islands 25.30
51 Kenya 25.10
52 Lesotho 25.10
53 Marshall Islands 25.00
54 Vanuatu 24.50
55 Guatemala 24.50
56 Nauru 24.40
57 Oman 24.30
58 Swaziland 24.30
59 Belize 24.30
60 Papua New Guinea 24.00
61 Philippines 24.00
62 Laos 23.90
63 Tajikistan 23.80
64 Tuvalu 23.80
65 Djibouti 23.60
66 Cambodia 23.40
67 Haiti 23.30
68 Algeria 23.00
69 American Samoa 22.90
70 Honduras 22.80
71 Tonga 22.60
72 Kyrgyzstan 22.60
73 Bolivia 22.40
74 Pakistan 22.30
75 Syria 21.70
76 Kiribati 21.30
77 Botswana 20.70
78 Samoa 20.60
79 South Africa 20.50
80 Micronesia, Federated States of 20.30
81 Cabo Verde 20.20
82 Nepal 19.90
83 Kuwait 19.60
84 Mongolia 19.60
85 Malaysia 19.40
86 India 19.30
87 Turkmenistan 19.30
88 Venezuela 19.20
89 Bangladesh 19.00
90 Fiji 19.00
91 Kazakhstan 18.70
92 Dominican Republic 18.60
93 Mexico 18.50
94 Saudi Arabia 18.40
95 Israel 18.30
96 Burma 18.20
97 Ecuador 18.20
98 Panama 18.10
99 Jamaica 18.00
100 Morocco 18.00
101 Peru 18.00
102 Nicaragua 17.90
103 Iran 17.80
104 Libya 17.80
105 Bhutan 17.50
106 Brunei 17.20
107 Northern Mariana Islands 17.20
108 Argentina 17.00
109 Uzbekistan 16.90
110 Guam 16.70
111 Paraguay 16.50
112 Tunisia 16.40
113 Indonesia 16.40
114 Colombia 16.30
115 El Salvador 16.30
116 Azerbaijan 16.20
117 Turkey 16.00
118 Suriname 16.00
119 Maldives 16.00
120 Antigua and Barbuda 15.80
121 Grenada 15.80
122 Costa Rica 15.70
123 Turks and Caicos Islands 15.70
124 Vietnam 15.70
125 Guyana 15.50
126 Sri Lanka 15.50
127 Bahamas, The 15.40
128 United Arab Emirates 15.30
129 New Caledonia 15.20
130 Dominica 15.20
131 French Polynesia 15.00
132 Korea, North 14.60
133 Ireland 14.50
134 Lebanon 14.40
135 Greenland 14.40
136 Brazil 14.30
137 Cook Islands 14.10
138 Gibraltar 14.10
139 Faroe Islands 14.00
140 Seychelles 13.90
141 Curacao 13.80
142 Iceland 13.80
143 Chile 13.70
144 Bahrain 13.50
145 Saint Lucia 13.50
146 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 13.40
147 Saint Kitts and Nevis 13.30
148 New Zealand 13.30
149 Wallis and Futuna 13.30
150 Armenia 13.30
151 Mauritius 13.10
152 Trinidad and Tobago 13.10
153 Albania 13.10
154 Sint Maarten 13.10
155 Uruguay 13.00
156 Anguilla 12.70
157 Aruba 12.50
158 Georgia 12.50
159 United States 12.50
160 China 12.40
161 France 12.30
162 Norway 12.20
163 Australia 12.10
164 Jersey 12.10
165 United Kingdom 12.10
166 Cayman Islands 12.10
167 Sweden 12.00
168 Barbados 11.80
169 Moldova 11.80
170 Macedonia 11.50
171 Belgium 11.40
172 Luxembourg 11.40
173 Cyprus 11.40
174 Russia 11.30
175 Bermuda 11.30
176 Palau 11.20
177 Thailand 11.10
178 British Virgin Islands 11.00
179 Isle of Man 11.00
180 Montserrat 11.00
181 Netherlands 10.90
182 Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) 10.90
183 Cuba 10.80
184 Puerto Rico 10.80
185 Finland 10.70
186 Ukraine 10.50
187 Belarus 10.50
188 Switzerland 10.50
189 Liechtenstein 10.40
190 Denmark 10.40
191 Estonia 10.30
192 Canada 10.30
193 Montenegro 10.20
194 Virgin Islands 10.20
195 Malta 10.10
196 Lithuania 10.00
197 Latvia 9.90
198 Slovakia 9.80
199 Guernsey 9.80
200 Saint Helena, Ascension, and Tristan da Cunha 9.70
201 Qatar 9.70
202 Poland 9.60
203 Czechia 9.50
204 Austria 9.50
205 Spain 9.40
206 Hong Kong 9.10
207 Hungary 9.10
208 Portugal 9.10
209 Romania 9.00
210 Croatia 9.00
211 Serbia 9.00
212 Bulgaria 8.80
213 Bosnia and Herzegovina 8.80
214 Macau 8.80
215 Italy 8.70
216 San Marino 8.60
217 Germany 8.50
218 Greece 8.50
219 Taiwan 8.40
220 Korea, South 8.40
221 Singapore 8.40
222 Slovenia 8.30
223 Andorra 7.80
224 Japan 7.80
225 Saint Pierre and Miquelon 7.20
226 Monaco 6.60

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

Are you guy's capable of looking at this beyond the humping part? Can we look at it on the larger scale then becoming trapped in the bedroom?

Probably have to take Mexico + South/Central America into consideration. There's over 600M today. Do we blame the Spanish,Portuguese, or Africans?

 

[KediKesenFare3]

Arabs & African nations

 

[Nilgiri]

Population growth rate and birth rate is still quite high in Pakistan:

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.GROW?locations=IN-BD-PK

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CBRT.IN?locations=IN-BD-PK

 

[Fenrir]

Lol. The answer I was looking for is over the last 500 year timeframe. Off the top of my head I would go for:-

1. British Isles
2. Germans
3. Spanish
4. Swedes
5. Russians

@Penguin @Technogaianist

I have sex because it's fun. I have sex because I'm in the mood to have sex. I have sex because it makes me feel better if I'm unhappy. It's good exercise too. But I've only ever once had sex to reproduce and am in no hurry to do that again.

Norway has a low birth rate, at about 12 births per 1000 people but is very sexually liberal. So I would say people around here just like to bone, but not for reproductive purposes.

In terms of birth rate Norway ranks 162nd out of 226 nations.

 

[sputnik]

Indians. Everywhere in Paris I see Tamil Indians wearing dhoti and eating idli sambhar. What did they do to get this far to Paris

I somewhat Agree with u. Was in Belgium few months back and Being Indian their is like nothing new while in church and university. I was out of India First time. but they calling us "Brown Prince" don't know why. not seen any dhoti clad Indian their. Seems Indians are part of their community now.

 

[Saleem]

Somalians in London

mirpuris in manchester....

 

[XenoEnsi-14]

Germans.

 

[KediKesenFare3]

Germans.

No. Germans were always numerous.

 

[Aramagedon]

Certainly black Africans, because they are very workless and also don't find condoms in their countries.

Btw Indians, Pakistanis and Chinese are very active too...

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Which part of "between 1500-2000" did you people not understand? We all know what sex is all about. We all know that growth varies across the world. However I was more interested historical strategic population growth rate. Africa contrary to what most people think has had very low absolute/relative population.

Of interest here is the strategic effect and shaping of the present world over the preceding 5 centuries. To understand that, it is of little use in giving damned snapshots of slivers of time. A camera snap today of a 500 year dynamic is pretty useless. I place British Isles first. In 1500 the population of England was 2.5 million and all of UK slightly more than 3.5 million. Yet that 3.5 million has shown such prolific growth as to win the "Olympic Gold".

1500AD - 3.5 million = Today

* 55 million
* 96 million
* 25 million
* 21 million
* 2 million
* 1.5 million
* There are small pockets in Zambia, Kenya, Zimbabawe and Argentina.

Total 199.5 million people with roots to British Isles. That is 57 times increase from 3.5 million in 1500. Can anybody else match this? And population of many European countries only appear to be low because huge amounts were exported abroad, mostly to the so called New World, filling them coast to coast.

Population increase follows what is known as demographic transition model (below) and countries are on it although at differant stages. It's funny to see for example German's mocking (who are at stage stage 5) Kenyan's who are at stage 2. In late 1890s Germans were in same spot - stage 2 and mas exported surplus German's as migrants to America, Australia and Brazil to name a few. Today significant number of American's are of German extraction.

There are also significant numbers of Swedes in US who also migrated during the high growth rate they experianced in 1890s. Today we live in a world where we regard migration as a affliction specific to some people. The fact is this is global and historical phenomenon. The major change over the last one and half centuries is not migration but the mass extermination of peoples to create space for migrants as was seen in North and to a degree in South America.

If all peoples were "nativized" or "repatriated" to their ancestoral origins UK, Spain, Germany would not have space to stand given the deluge that would take place. The largest recent migrant wave to displace native people occured only in 1947 when the Mediteranean saw boats full of Poles, Latvians, Lithuanians, Ukranians, Russians etc running from post war Europe to refuge in Palestine. In a strange twist of fate today people proximate from the same region - Western Asia are today moving in the exact reverse direction.

I will look at the German and Spanish 'prolific' record in next post.

@Technogaianist @Nilgiri @2800 @KediKesenFare

 

[Stephen Cohen]

Which part of "between 1500-2000" did you people not understand? We all know what sex is all about. We all know that growth varies across the world. However I was more interested historical strategic population growth rate. Africa contrary to what most people think has had very low absolute/relative population.

Of interest here is the strategic effect and shaping of the present world over the preceding 5 centuries. To understand that, it is of little use in giving damned snapshots of slivers of time. A camera snap today of a 500 year dynamic is pretty useless. I place British Isles first. In 1500 the population of England was 2.5 million and all of UK slightly more than 3.5 million. Yet that 3.5 million has shown such prolific growth as to win the "Olympic Gold".

1500AD - 3.5 million = Today

* 55 million
* 96 million
* 25 million
* 21 million
* 2 million
* 1.5 million
* There are small pockets in Zambia, Kenya, Zimbabawe and Argentina.

Total 199.5 million people with roots to British Isles. That is 57 times increase from 3.5 million in 1500. Can anybody else match this? And population of many European countries only appear to be low because huge amounts were exported abroad, mostly to the so called New World, filling them coast to coast.

Population increase follows what is known as demographic transition model (below) and countries are on it although at differant stages. It's funny to see for example German's mocking (who are at stage stage 5) Kenyan's who are at stage 2. In late 1890s Germans were in same spot - stage 2 and mas exported surplus German's as migrants to America, Australia and Brazil to name a few. Today significant number of American's are of German extraction.

There are also significant numbers of Swedes in US who also migrated during the high growth rate they experianced in 1890s. Today we live in a world where we regard migration as a affliction specific to some people. The fact is this is global and historical phenomenon. The major change over the last one and half centuries is not migration but the mass extermination of peoples to create space for migrants as was seen in North and to a degree in South America.

If all peoples were "nativized" or "repatriated" to their ancestoral origins UK, Spain, Germany would not have space to stand given the deluge that would take place. The largest recent migrant wave to displace native people occured only in 1947 when the Mediteranean saw boats full of Poles, Latvians, Lithuanians, Ukranians, Russians etc running from post war Europe to refuge in Palestine. In a strange twist of fate today people proximate from the same region - Western Asia are today moving in the exact reverse direction.

I will look at the German and Spanish 'prolific' record in next post.

@Technogaianist @Nilgiri @2800 @KediKesenFare

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death

 

[Indus Pakistan]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death

Yes, thanks, we do know about the Black Death. But how is that relevant to discussion in hand - which covers 1500~2000.