What's new

World Intellectual Prop Org: Rise of China as World's Largest IP Powerhouse

Any ranking for 2016 by applicants?


The ranking of Top 100 Applicants in post #36 is from 2016 Report (see below, page 45-46) which is already latest United Nations publication. Inside the report they use actual and latest historical data, no projection, no forecast. For 2016 ranking, we have to wait for next report, perhaps in early December 2017 or later.

http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_941_2016.pdf

Top100-chart.png
 
Last edited:
.
The ranking of Top 100 Applicants in post #36 is from 2016 Report (see below, page 45-46) which is already latest United Nations publication. Inside the report they use actual and latest historical data, no projection, no forecast. For 2016 ranking, we have to wait for next report, perhaps in early December 2017 or later.

http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_941_2016.pdf

China is largest patent filer in total, why only 23 companies in Top 100?
 
.
China is largest patent filer in total, why only 23 companies in Top 100?


Relatively speaking, China patents are more dispersed across many organisations, especially thousands of SME in the private sector, independent labs, startups, even individuals. The trend is more M&A happening in the tech sector, say recent merger of Baosteel and Wuhan Steel.

Japan patents are more concentrated in large corporations, due to unique centuries-old socio-economic structure, aka Keiretsu. Similar phenomenon in South Korea, the Chaebol structure.
 
Last edited:
.
Relatively speaking, China patents are more dispersed across many organisations, especially thousands of SME in the private sector, even individuals.

Japan patents are more concentrated in large corporations, due to unique socio-economic structure, aka Keiretsu. Similar phenomenon in South Korea, the Chaebol structure.
I see many Chinese universities in the list.
This is a very good sign of progress in the industry-goverment-education complex.

Harbin Insitute of Technology is in the list, a university in Northeast China.
I'm sure HIT Robot Group has made a great contribution....
It was cofounded by Harbin Insitute of Technology and Harbin City Government


2012031000364741438.png
屏幕快照 2016-10-21 14-1.56.05.png
屏幕快照 2016-10-21 15.10.58.png
23242.jpg
1468567168d73e8d8d5e57a66b-1.png
 
Last edited:
.
I see many Chinese universities in the list.
This is a very good sign of progress in the industry-goverment-education complex.

Harbin Insitute of Technology is in the list.
I'm sure HIT Robot Group has made a great contribution....
It was cofounded by Harbin Insitute of Technology and Harbin City Government


View attachment 357234 View attachment 357235 View attachment 357236 View attachment 357237 View attachment 357238


Sharp observation! HIT is aggressive in robotics and automation, also check Tsinghua and their aggressive businesses in chipset techs.

Yes there are non-commercial orgs in the Top 100 from China, like universities and research institutes. They conduct R&D, own the patents, work in conjunction with tech companies to commercialise the techs. Like Keiretsu structure of Japan, Chaebol structure of SK, this Industry-University-Research (产学研) structure is also a popular characteristic of China.
 
Last edited:
.
Sharp observation! HIT is aggressive in robotics and automation, also check Tsinghua and their aggressive businesses in chipset techs.

Yes there are non-commercial orgs in the Top 100 from China, like universities and research institutes. They conduct R&D, own the patents, work in conjunction with tech companies to commercialise the techs. Like Keiretsu structure of Japan, Chaebol structure of SK, this Industry-University-Research (产学研) structure is also a popular characteristic of China.


Can you post more details about this Structure?
 
. .
I want to know too.
It's classified information. Don't want to share in foreign site
I don't want to disclose information to RSS Hindu.
 
Last edited:
.
It's classified information. Don't want to share in foreign site
I don't want to disclose information to RSS Hindu.
I just find out my university is also in the list!
 
.
Can you post more details about this Structure?


Do you mean Industry-University-Research (IUR, "产学研") structure? For details you may find alot of studies of IUR on the web. In brief it's the universities or research institutes doing R&D, own the patents, and let corporations commercialize the tech.


IUR is particularly popular in China since universities (and research institutes) are state-run, they have big R&D resources. In PRC, universities are not just education centers, they are state-funded R&D bases. There are many ways universities/institutes to support private sector, e.g. patents can become seed investment in form of intangible assets, or simply by licensing.

HIT in robotics, Tsinghua in chipset/semi-conductor, are good examples.

Tech is financially high risk, it's beyond affordability of many SME (small & medium enterprises). Only SOE like State Grid of China (e.g. ultra-high-voltage), SAC (e.g. J31 fighter jet project), Sinopec (e.g. shale fracking tech), and large POE such as ZTE, Huawei, BYD can afford in-house R&D.
 
Last edited:
.
@Shotgunner51 is there a difference between the different classes of patents ?
Is one class more important than another ?
 
.
Do you mean Industry-University-Research (IUR, "产学研") structure? For details you may find alot of studies of IUR on the web. In brief it's the universities or research institutes doing R&D, own the patents, and let corporations commercialize the tech.

IUR is particularly popular in China since universities (and research institutes) are state-run, they have big R&D resources. In PRC, universities are not just education centers, they are state-funded R&D bases. There are many ways universities/institutes to support private sector, e.g. patents can become seed investment in form of intangible assets, or simply by licensing.

HIT in robotics, Tsinghua in chipset/semi-conductor, are good examples.

Tech is financially high risk, it's beyond affordability of many SME (small & medium enterprises). Only SOE like State Grid of China (e.g. ultra-high-voltage), SAC (e.g. J31 fighter jet project), Sinopec (e.g. shale fracking tech), and large POE such as ZTE, Huawei, BYD can afford in-house R&D.


Thanks, I am more interested in the Chinese model since it drives grassroots level innovation:china:
This is a model which we should adopt, tag me if you have any other information on this subject
 
.
@Shotgunner51 is there a difference between the different classes of patents ?
Is one class more important than another ?


Patents are the same.

There is another IP called utility model. Like a patent, a utility model (UM) confers a set of rights for an invention for a limited period, during which UM holders can commercially exploit their inventions on an exclusive basis. The terms and conditions for granting a UM differ from those for granting a traditional patent. For example, UMs are issued for a shorter period (7–10 years), and at most offices protection is granted without substantive examination. As with patents, procedures for granting UM rights are governed by the rules and regulations of national intellectual property (IP) offices, and rights are limited to the jurisdiction of the issuing authority. Approximately 75 countries provide protection for UMs.

For UM data, check page 64 on 2016 Report: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_941_2016.pdf

Thanks, I am more interested in the Chinese model since it drives grassroots level innovation:china:
This is a model which we should adopt, tag me if you have any other information on this subject


You are most welcome, I just add a link to my previous reply (post #49), wish that adds value. To explain how it works, imagine you run a small tech biz but without much R&D capital, you go talk to a university that can help you, license their patent or ask them to invest those patents in your company.

The IUR model fits China, where R&D resources are highly dominated by state. The state organs (universities, banks/funds) of China somewhat resembles the Keiretsu in Japan, or the Chaebol in South Korea.

I wish the best to India in her innovation and technological development, but I don't know if IUR fits India, it's upto any nation to find a model that fits its very own socio-economic system.
 
Last edited:
.
TMSS and PISA are the most important international tests for students to show how good they rank in the world. Pisa results coming out soon
 
.
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1021507.shtml
China needs to boost innovation to move from ‘world’s factory’ to manufacturing power
By Hu Weijia Source:Global Times Published: 2016/12/2 0:28:39

China's reputation as the world's factory means it may come as a surprise that the country spends almost twice as much on integrated circuits (IC) from overseas than it does on crude oil. That would be no big deal if China didn't import a lot of oil, except that it does. In the first 10 months this year, the country spent $92.6 billion on crude oil imports, eclipsing the US as the world's top buyer of foreign oil in certain months, according to customs data.

Meanwhile, overseas companies producing and selling IC took $181.4 billion out of China's wallet, causing a huge trade deficit in the industry, per customs statistics.

China needs to urgently boost its IC industry and encourage core-technology innovation in the manufacturing sector to strengthen competitiveness. Despite the fact that products marked "Made in China" are sold in almost every corner of the world, it seems that the country still has a long way to go before it becomes a real global manufacturing powerhouse.

For example, Chinese drone maker DJI alleges that its products account for 70 percent of the global consumer drone market. However, media reports have said that although domestic components are largely used by the high-tech company, some of its drones with a particular camera need to use a sensor provided by Japan's Sony Corp to improve their performance.

China has become the world's largest exporter of goods, but many key components with high added value are still produced by foreign companies. This allows multinational firms from countries like the US and Japan to earn a large amount of money from the Chinese market, while at the same time authorities in those countries criticize China for registering a trade deficit with them.

China is the only country in the world that boasts all the industries defined in the UN's industry classification system. However, it is obvious that some foreign enterprises still hold a strategic piece of the industrial chain and that China will remain an assembly line for overseas high-tech firms if the country doesn't pursue a path of independent innovation. A complete industrial chain built in the country could help manufacturers improve efficiency and reduce costs.

China's IC industry has for many years been struggling to catch up, yet Japan, South Korea and the US still take the lead, despite competitiveness from enterprises in Southeast China's Taiwan. China to an extent lags behind other countries in providing State support and funding to the IC industry. To rectify this, the government should focus more on boosting innovation for key components to upgrade its manufacturing sector.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom