OrionHunter
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 13,818
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
I think you need to get your head examined. Why the fuk should Night Satellite Photos | Earth, U.S., Europe, World | Geology.com fake India's images?The OP graph on India is faked!
- or shall I say deliberately arranged vís-a-vís others in order to achieve a centain effect somehow.
The reason is simple - it defies logic and some well-known facts:
1. more than 1/3 of India is in stone-age - has never seen electricity ( a fact from the UN) - it's not shown in the graph.
2. On the contrary it shows that India even had larger lighted area and lighter than East, Middle and South China putting together (actually graph of India was even brighter than Mid and West coast USA putting together), which has electricity usage percap about 6 or 8 times more than India. China's southern industrial hub and night life hub - heavily populated Canton - looked like a half-desert compared to India. The graphs gives a very misleading signal. That is unbelievable as it 's against against some well-established facts. "Population density" alone can not explain this.
3. India has average GDP/cap lower than Africa, and roughly similar population and electricity usage/person as Africa. Yet why so much lightness differences between the two? - another loophole here.
4. Both Thailand and Vietnam have GDP/cap higher than India, and with similar population density. Thailand and Vietnam both have electricity coverage far higher than India. And Thai/Viet, due to cultural and climate reasons, both have far more vibrant night lives than India as generally known to travellers. Yet it is obvious from the the graphs on India VsThailand/Vietnam is like USA Vs Africa, almost completely dark in Thailand /Vietnam. This is just bullsh!t!
5. the single 3 largest and brightest areas were : Western EU, Eastern USA and India - one doesn't need to reach 85 IQ to see that is so fake!
6. the south borders of the Hymalayas - the northern part of India and South Tibet were brighter and much more densely lit than the entire South China - the industrial/manufacture hub of China and the world! Are the author/s of the graphs the same ones as those who made Youtube vid where the Whites serving India in 2035? because they seem to share the similar mentalities.
... there're many other discrepancies as well.
Hence, for one reason or another, the OP graphs, and/or the original source of them, have been badly tempered by some people to serve a certain purpose.
one of the easiest tricks to temper the graphs is -
deliberately choose different timings for different regions, to take advantages of differences on time zones (many even on seasons as well), day-light saving schemes that some countries are adapting, and regional cultural norm differences, etc to reach some misconceptions that the authors of the graphs want to propagate.
Yet either way no matter how one chooses different times, that almost entire India was very brightly and densely lit like a shopping mall Christmas tree at any particular time is just impossible, except that some obvious photoshopping was applied.
Your a$$ seems to be on the boil. Grow up and stop your silly conspiracy theories.