Mike_Brando
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 3,232
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
Women are not eligible enough to join the Indian Armed Forces as full blown combat soldiers and officers.Period!!Why do you over-sensitive male feminists jump to the conclusion that a woman who isn't let to jump in to do a man's job, should be confined to the kitchen?
There are historic reasons why women are not an imminent part of full blown combat scenarios. This includes physical considerations.
This is not a stupid corporate office where people sitting in ties and suits in plush AC rooms are using their heads on a report or probably a sales target.
We are talking about a bloody war zone.
Not just infantry but spec ops.
Picture a 5'8" (I am being liberal with female dimensions which is much lesser in our country on an average) woman, equipped to the boot with battle gear along with male soldiers, rushing through a hail of bullets and artillery from the other side. Suddenly, her male comrade is shot and severely injured. She's in the middle of a dense tropical surrounding where she has only herself and her 10 team members spread out in the region. Her partner is injured and she is almost surrounded in a fight, with only one way to go: back.
What gives you the faintest inkling that she'd be able to carry a 85-90+ Kg man with 40 Kg of equipment on him that too in a semi-conscious state all while shooting through the barrage of bullets, avoiding trees, thorns etc in a dangerous terrain?
Well my experience, observations and constant interaction with the military folks and their drills states NO. It is because that is not what a woman's body is built for.
It will simply be stupid to assume that just for the sake of grandiose and the idiotic neo-liberal mentality, we put a woman's life in danger by putting her in full blown combative situations.
Women do serve in army and in very capable roles that require them to even take up a semi-combat role. But that is in a specific service commission basis.
See, it is simply practicality.
A woman's body can endure much more internal pain like childbirth, than a male counterpart. But her external endurance is limited. It is not something inferior or superior. It is simply nature.
Women are welcome in armed forces to contribute to the skill but a full blown frontline role to command and lead wars is a silly and strange move by the Army.
It doesn't matter what those feminists might think but women are simply not built for this job.It has nothing to do with any kind of sexual discrimination.Plus their loyalty is also a matter of concern.It has been shown repeates in the histrory of mankind that women tend to shift their loyalty under duress or if coerced properly by an enemy.The same can't be said about their male counterparts.Hence the I.A. has made the right decision of barring the women from joining any kind of combat structure!!