With eye on China, India shifts 50,000 additional troops to border in historic move: Report

[Osiris]

"Bone crushing..."

Lol ..what batshit have you Chinese been having?

Don't buy into these Pakistani propaganda videos on YouTube.

Who can not get over the fact, that they carry the shameful badge of largest surrender ever after world war 2, by claiming that more 98 thousand Indian troop surrendered in 1962. Where as Chinese them selves claim, that total number was about three thousand.

 

[IblinI]

Lol ..what batshit have your Chinese been feeding yourselves?

Don't buy into these Pakistani propaganda videos if YouTube.

Who can not get over the fact, that they carry the shameful badge of largest surrender ever after world war 2, by claiming that more 98 thousand India troop surrendered in 1962. Where as Chinese them selves claim, that total number was about three thousand.

Let me give you a round of applause for achieving a barely 50% surrender rate.

Indian sources:[13][14]
1,383 killed
1,696 missing
548–1,047 wounded
3,968 captured

Chinese sources:[10]
4,897 killed or wounded
3,968 captured

 

[Osiris]

Let me give you a round of applause for achieving a barely 50% surrender rate.

Indian sources:[13][14]
1,383 killed
1,696 missing
548–1,047 wounded
3,968 captured

Chinese sources:[10]
4,897 killed or wounded
3,968 captured

Umm ....since you are sourcing from Wikipedia...why don't you post the difference in size of both the armies involved in this conflict too?

Where Chinese army was 4 times larger than Indian armed army.

 

[IblinI]

Umm ....since you are sourcing from Wikipedia...why don't you post the difference in size of both forces too?

Where Chinese army was 4 times larger than Indian armed forces.

ofc, it's the size that matters (as always the excuses heard from our enemy), we have neheru on his forward policy but just couldn't do his math properly, and we have people here who don't understand the ground reality of how clusters those Tibetan mountainous battlefield is.

 

[Osiris]

ofc, it's the size that matters (as always the excuses heard from our enemy), we have neheru on his forward policy but just couldn't do his math properly, and we have people here who don't understand the ground reality of how clusters those Tibetan mountainous battlefield is.

What ?
That's neither here nor there .

Are you claiming that Chinese didn't launch a surprise attack with many times larger forces?

 

[IblinI]

What ?
That's neither here nor there .

Are you claiming that Chinese didn't launch a surprise attack with many times larger forces?

neheru with forward policy but got surprised attack from us, something just didn't sound right.
you are literally humiliating your top brass and intel office.
anyway, have a nice day, dine out time.

 

[Xerxes22]

The War for Afganistan is ending in a victory by HIS GRACE.....

The War for Kashmir is starting by HIS PERMISSION.....

Sefer is from the Believers, Zafer is from HIM...

Wat victory are u looking at in Afghanistan ? You call a taliban victory , victory for gods ppl? Taliban who bomb schools belonging to 4 yr old kids ? Stop dramatacising events ... this sort of things Are ridiculous. Tells me a lot about ur intellectual depth.

In the case of Pakistan, Pakistan has a golden opportunity now that's the Hindu racists screwed everything up for them and made a serious enemy out of China. India in no way can fight on two fronts with two nuclear armed nemesis. Pakistan must take advantage of this and try to regain Kashmir While the irrational untactful BJP is still in power. At the next even of tension between china nd India, Pakistan must initiate an invasion of its own into India... this will push china to secure its own interests inside Indian and then India will be lost and modi will be hanged. Good riddance.

 

[newb3e]

Umm ....since you are sourcing from Wikipedia...why don't you post the difference in size of both the armies involved in this conflict too?

Where Chinese army was 4 times larger than Indian armed army.

ohh so now its about size of country and army! gg Modi g gg!!

you have managed to do what none before you could! you enslaved 1 billion endiots with your words!

Genius!

 

[Osiris]

neheru with forward policy but got surprised attack from us, something just didn't sound right.
you are literally humiliating your top brass and intel office.
anyway, have a nice day, dine out time.

You Chinese and your forward policy nonesene.

Do you even understand what forward policy was? Forward policy, simply put was India for the first time deploying it troops to guard it's borders with China.

Before that there were no Indian soldiers Aksai Chin..due to which China had slowly creeping up and capturing territory and even built a highway through Indian claimed Aksai Chin.

 

[Bouncer]

‘India Has Moved 4 Divisions from Pak to Ladakh Border, Creating Vulnerability If Pak Is Aggressive’

No wonder local friends near the border reported a lifting of green cloud of body odor.

 

[waz]

Lol ..what batshit have you Chinese been having?

Don't buy into these Pakistani propaganda videos on YouTube.

Who can not get over the fact, that they carry the shameful badge of largest surrender ever after world war 2, by claiming that more 98 thousand Indian troop surrendered in 1962. Where as Chinese them selves claim, that total number was about three thousand.

Shameful surrender aye, much like your forces who were captured during the Galwan clash, including high ranking officers.
The hilarious part was that you denied them missing, and didn’t know their whereabouts, yet still trumpeting to the bull$hit claim you killed 40 plus Chinese when they captured your men.

It was finally ascertained late Tuesday that 10 soldiers, including four officers, were still missing. This was raised during the talks Wednesday and the Chinese accepted that the soldiers were in their custody.

10 Indian soldiers return from Chinese custody after matter raised in talks

Talks at the Major General level between the two sides were held in a very tense environment where both sides discussed the incident.

www.indianexpress.com

You should be telling them to fight to the death rather talking about something which happened 50 years ago.

 

[IblinI]

You Chinese and your forward policy nonesene.

Do you even understand what forward policy was? Forward policy, simply put was India for the first time deploying it troops to guard it's borders with China.

Before that there were no Indian soldiers Aksai Chin..due to which China had slowly creeping up and capturing territory and even built a highway through Indian claimed Aksai Chin.

we are in a different dimension, no point in further discussion, bye.

Shameful surrender aye, much like your forces who were captured during the Galwan clash, including high ranking officers.
The hilarious part was that you denied them missing, and didn’t know their whereabouts, yet still trumpeting to bull$hit claim you killed 40 plus Chinese when they captured your men lol.

It was finally ascertained late Tuesday that 10 soldiers, including four officers, were still missing. This was raised during the talks Wednesday and the Chinese accepted that the soldiers were in their custody.

10 Indian soldiers return from Chinese custody after matter raised in talks

Talks at the Major General level between the two sides were held in a very tense environment where both sides discussed the incident.

www.indianexpress.com

You should be telling them to fight to the death rather talking about something which happened 50 years ago.

in case they denied (ofc they will).

 

[Osiris]

Shameful surrender aye, much like your forces who were captured during the Galwan clash, including high ranking officers.
The hilarious part was that you denied them missing, and didn’t know their whereabouts, yet still trumpeting to the bull$hit claim you killed 40 plus Chinese when they captured your men.

It was finally ascertained late Tuesday that 10 soldiers, including four officers, were still missing. This was raised during the talks Wednesday and the Chinese accepted that the soldiers were in their custody.

10 Indian soldiers return from Chinese custody after matter raised in talks

Talks at the Major General level between the two sides were held in a very tense environment where both sides discussed the incident.

www.indianexpress.com

You should be telling them to fight to the death rather talking about something which happened 50 years ago.

Read again, what I have written, that Pakistanis create such fake YouTube videos in which they claim that some 98 thousand Indian troops surrendered in 1962 war, to wash away their own "shameful badge of the largest surrender after world war 2"

 

[waz]

Read again, what I have written, that Pakistanis create such fake YouTube videos in which they claim that some 98 thousand Indian troops surrendered in 1962 war, to wash away their own "shameful badge of the largest surrender after world war 2"

Yes it’s a wrong figure, but you should be the last folks to talk about shameful surrenders.
For the record there isn’t anything shameful in giving up if the odds mean your destruction.

 

[alee92nawaz]

It can carry out massive and bone-crushing offensives against both China and Pak where required.

Thank God it didn't actually do anything. Otherwise who would save Pak or China.

Umm ....since you are sourcing from Wikipedia...why don't you post the difference in size of both the armies involved in this conflict too?

Where Chinese army was 4 times larger than Indian armed army.

I don't usually engage with trolls but entertain me with this. Why don't you cry about size difference when you mention your so called military achievements against Pakistan