What's new

With all the flak Navjot Singh Sidhu is getting in India...here is his take.

. .
But are these sikhs following sikhism themselves. Some one told me in england that immigrant sikhs are hypocrites. As per their religion nonveg and rum is strictly prohibited but they still consume. Othersides they demand a country based on religion.
Well I am not sure how correct this is.
 
. .
It just clearly shows who drafted this

For Sikhs Punjab is Punjab whether it lies in India or Pakistan

Now tell me:
Why would any Sikh not choose Lahore as the capital of their sovereign country :p:


The reasons are given if you have read the draft carefully. It's to do with Indian constitution not recognising them as Sikhs but rather as hindus.
 
.
It will make sense to Sikhs for their reverence for holy birth place of Guru Nanak


As Sidhu has said, Bajwa talked about opening the Punjab border at Kartarpur for Sikh pilgrimage...that will do as per the Sikh demand...talk about their grievances and demands, no Sikh is interested in taking Lahore or for that matter Pak Punjab, if wishes were horses....
 
.
The reasons are given if you have read the draft carefully. It's to do with Indian constitution not recognising them as Sikhs but rather as hindus.


Absolutely right and to the point...and that makes Hindu claim that Sikhs and Hindus are same, people with same religion, and they cremate their dead at the same place...the reason they do it is 'cause Sikhs have no burial places and they are not recognised as separate entity and people with separate religion and belief, again Hindu hegemony and bigotry here...


5UumaNiIJFJZtbf929Ou_27_2dba563d1d6df167d75b6dd3588d3115_image.jpg
 
. .
The reasons are given if you have read the draft carefully. It's to do with Indian constitution not recognising them as Sikhs but rather as hindus.
Even today many Punjabi Hindus raise their eldest male child as a Sikh as directed by tenth Sikh Guru.

That is how entire Sikh community had been evolved to protect Hindus.

Anyways history doesn't mean anything for many on this forum :hitwall:
 
. .
Lol...Pakistan Punjab is 96% Muslim, it is Indian Occupied Punjab that includes Haryana, Himachal Paradesh as well, divided earlier, in the scheme of things.

It is like saying why Mecca and Medina is not in Pakistan...talking about Lahore as capital...it is above and beyond the main idea.

Quote:

The entire Punjab region was annexed by the British East India Company from the Sikh Empire in 1849. In 1947, the Punjab Province of British India was divided along religious lines into West Punjaband East Punjab. The western part was assimilated into new country of Pakistan while the east stayed in India. The Indian Punjab as well as PEPSU was divided into three parts on the basis of language in 1966. Haryanvi-speaking areas (a dialect of Hindi) were carved out as Haryana, while the hilly regions and Pahari-speaking areas formed Himachal Pradesh, alongside the current state of Punjab.

Haryanvis are pure Hindustanis , Himachalis are Pahadis who consider punjabis Dark and Inferior.

What is left iz today's Panjab, with 65_ Sikh and rest is Hindu.
 
.
Even today many Punjabi Hindus raise their eldest male child as a Sikh as directed by tenth Sikh Guru.

That is how entire Sikh community had been evolved to protect Hindus.

Anyways history doesn't mean anything for many on this forum :hitwall:

Who gives flying fk to what "Punjabi hindus" are doing? Do the rest of hindus if India, the RSS lot raise their eldest as Sikhs? Lousy argument.

If I was Indian establishment, I will ammendments the constitution now to recognise the Sikhs as separate religion.
 
.
Haryanvis are pure Hindustanis , Himachalis are Pahadis who consider punjabis Dark and Inferior.

What is left iz today's Panjab, with 65_ Sikh and rest is Hindu.



Majority of people of Haryana speak Punjabi other than Hindi but certainly not Haryanvi. Most of them can also read Punjabi. But the Haryanvi culture portrayed in film and movies is that of southern Haryana which lies below Delhi and joins Rajasthan and UP...kind of not the whole truth.

Haryanvi cities like Panipat, Ambala , Krukshetra, Sirsa are culturally closer to Punjabis….on the other hand cities which borders UP or Delhi are culturally closer to UP……but Jaats are of same stock as Jatts of Punjab so we can say that some castes like Jaats are originally Punjabies settled in Cow belt….
 
. .
Majority of people of Haryana speak Punjabi other than Hindi but certainly not Haryanvi. Most of them can also read Punjabi. But the Haryanvi culture portrayed in film and movies is that of southern Haryana which lies below Delhi and joins Rajasthan and UP...kind of not the whole truth.

Haryanvi cities like Panipat, Ambala , Krukshetra, Sirsa are culturally closer to Punjabis….on the other hand cities which borders UP or Delhi are culturally closer to UP……but Jaats are of same stock as Jatts of Punjab so we can say that some castes like Jaats are originally Punjabies settled in Cow belt….

Kurukshetra, Ambala and Panipat have Large number of Brahmins who are staunchly Haryanvi.

Major parts of North Haryana are Brahmin dominated due to migration of Brahmins from Mountains to pains fo economic reasons.

As for jat brotherhood, go on. I want to unite my own people as well.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom