Wish burqa was not worn in Australian PM.

[shaheenmissile]

Cover up but not the face. Because if you cover up the face then we will not be able to identify. We even oppose this because of her face veil:

The Australian prime ministers statement is about head scarf,not face vail.

 

[Bratva]

I've answered this allready in this thread and 100 times in the last month in this forum.I just lost patience.

Yes,the Inquisition is back after the burqa,western countries are the most opressive regimes on Earth out to destroy Islam by banning 7th century tents on women.I just lost patience saying the same thing over and over again.Have a good night.

Yes that's what I expected. Your answers are incoherent, illogical, out of mind, retarded, doesn't hold enough juice to convince anyone and when you run out of your IQ, you decided to quit. Good going bro

 

[Biplab Bijay]

The Australian prime ministers statement is about head scarf,not face vail.

Its about veil.

 

[shaheenmissile]

What are your views on Blasphemy laws in Qatar?

Those laws are not much different from libel laws,copy right laws and defamation laws.

 

[Gibbs]

The Australian prime ministers statement is about head scarf,not face vail.

Read the article again.. If you find it hard to comprehend ask somebody to translate

 

[IPL5]

If i was a girl,i would want a full control about who can have a good look at my assets and who cannot. There is nothing alien about it.

It is called CULTURAL DIFFERENCE. what you like as per your culture may not be like by someone of other culture. nothing wrong with them and nothing wrong with you either.

 

[Bratva]

I am quite impress

You monsieur win this thread, I mean with this logic I am sure now I know why my gramps left the old homeland and merci again for the awesome logic of comparing the face to a "asset."

So what ? If you are hell bent on defending the life style you think it is appropriate for you and when someone wants to live a lifestyle they think appropriate for themselves, you get all hyped all... Great.. Nice to meet you Mr. Hypocrite

 

[shaheenmissile]

I am quite impress

You monsieur win this thread, I mean with this logic I am sure now I know why my gramps left the old homeland and merci again for the awesome logic of comparing the face to a "asset."

Look up dictionary meaning of asset. Means personal property. A girls face is her personal property i guess.

 

[liontk]

What security threats burqas have created so far in Britian ?

Un veiling and un concealing your identity in front of LEA official who is concerned is perfectly normal. A cop on patrol walk can ask the lady to verify her identity which she will happily do. What;s the problem ?

And I don't get the obsessions of yours and yours ilk whose panties are constantly getting in twist when it is perfectly okay for you what White girl wears but when it comes to muslim ladies and girls you become hypcrite ?

Ahh I was waiting for the good ol muslim card to appear somewhere and guess what I am a muslim as well. If you have the right to see my face in the public then I have the right to see your face as well so yes in a way it is abusing the privacy of the society. I will no longer entertain your talking points if you cannot comprehend my personal right being violated in public by someone concealing their identity. In fact in the west, facial expression is a very important criteria when we interact with each other.

 

[Bratva]

What are your views on Blasphemy laws in Qatar?

What about "Speaking about holocaust law" implemented all over europe ?

 

[flamer84]

Yes that's what I expected. Your answers are incoherent, illogical, out of mind, retarded, doesn't hold enough juice to convince anyone and when you run out of your IQ, you decided to quit. Good going bro

Now it's my fault because you lack comprehension skills.Ok,let's give it another try.

Mormons in the US used to say that polygamy was required in their religion but that wasn't accepted by society.

There are some hippies out there which worship mother Earth or something like that and their religion requires them to walk around naked but society prohibits them to do so in public.Etc,etc.

You can use "freedom of religion" card only up to a point.Many times that point is conventional norms established by that society.

 

[Bratva]

Ahh I was waiting for the good ol muslim card to appear somewhere and guess what I am a muslim as well. If you have the right to see my face in the public then I have the right to see your face as well so yes in a way it is abusing the privacy of the society. I will no longer entertain your talking points if you cannot comprehend my personal right being violated in public by someone concealing their identity. In fact in the west, facial expression is a very important criteria when we interact with each other.

Is there a law that you are obliged to see face covered in veil or faces of stranger ? Cmon you are canadian citizen, let's talk in Legal terms shall we, so either one us can burst the bubble of other.

 

[DingDong]

What about "Speaking about holocaust law" implemented all over europe ?

SO the Liberal Advocacy was a joke upon the non-Muslims NO?

 

[Gibbs]

Merci beaucoup for those compliments, if you think I am a bleeding heart liberal then you are sadly mistaken and neither is Canada a liberal country. We are currently governed by Fiscal Conservatives(i.e. Steven harper) for the last decade or so and in fact most liberals prefer niqab or the sikh faith dagger over their personal security. Hence they have been decimated in Canadian electoral for the past decade for being clueless with reality.

I am not going to entertain your liberal talking points over an issue that has to do with safety of the general public and populace at large. Veiling and concealing your identity in form of niqab,veil, ski mask and others are all the same. Also I do not get your obsession with what we do here in the west as Pakistan is not remotely involved in this situation. What australia does about is their personal business and I hope the folks down there make the appropriate decision.

The height of hypocrisy is that a person calling Australia hypocritical while presumably living in the worst region for human rights or civil liberties. Where a mere attempt of individuality may end up with your head chopped off or stoned to death. Where woman are considered mere objects for procreation with no faces or personalities

I just cant understand where these people pop out from

 

[Bratva]

Now it's my fault because you lack comprehension skills.Ok,let's give it another try.

Mormons in the US used to say that polygamy was required in their religion but that wasn't accepted by society.

There are some hippies out there which worship mother Earth or something like that and their religion requires them to walk around naked but society prohibits them to do so in public.Etc,etc.

You can use "freedom of religion" card only up to a point.Many times that point is conventional norms established by that society.

But it is acceptable to tolerate amish lifestyle but a muslim lady covering whatever she wants out of her own free wil can't be tolerated, is this what you are conveying right ?