The fact of the matter is, we do not have any proof. If there is proof, PAF would have released it. All these fanboys statements are as good as melodrama.
What's further more, we went on to boldly claim we had a pilot in our custody. Not simply "initial reports indicate we have an injured pilot in CMH", no no no.... it was "we have an IAF pilot period". Then we had to shamelessly eat our words.
While the idiots on the other side, were happily shooting down their own chopper. But one wrong which they haven't committed is backtrack their statements. When your statements gets backtracked, you lose credibility. Their military/govt official spokespersons were consistent throughout the saga. But even they are sneaky bastards, that they didn't mention if their MiG-21 was shot down or was a technical fault. So how can we take their F-16 claim as true?
Looking at it from a unbiased third point view, The outcome of the engagement is:
1 - MiG-21 down confirmed - probability of PAF killing it is very high. Technical fault very low.
1 - F-16 claimed - probability of kill unknown.
1 - Su-30MKI claimed - probability of kill by PAF very low.