Will Trump direct a military strike against Iran?

[Mugwop]

What will they achieve by a strike lol? They will only slow down iran's N growing capabilities by minimum 4 years.
Plus iran can't be invaded it's impregnable thanks to it's terrain.

 

[Full Moon]

They won't strike, just talk.

You underestimate the required size of such a campaign, it would require military numbers equal to the coalition build up for the 1991 desert storm. It would also endanger the thousands of US troops in Iraq.

GCC & Jordan should stop being America's dog of the region. They even hosted America's war on Saddam's Iraq, yet you cry about Iran. Butbutbut... if you hadn't have helped the US remove Saddam would Iran even be a threat?

May be they won't strike, who knows. But to answer your question, our relationship with Iraq was too good to be true. We sided with Saddam in the unfair 8 years war with Iran and provided his regime with all financial support it needed (estimates vary from one source to another and it ranges between 25-50 billon Dollars). God only knows what lobying has Bandar Bin Sultan did in Washington to get as much help as possible from the US to Iraq during the war. Everything collapsed on August 2nd 1990 when Saddam used the army we helped building to stab us in the back. It was sudden, quick, and very unpredictable even by the most pessimistic person among us, and we were very unprepared for the war. Needless to say that from that moment the Saudi leadership excluded Iraq totally from any freindly action it may take (and who would blame them). Although I must say that the US didn't invade Iraq in 2003 because we want them to do that. They did it for thier own internal political purposes which turned out to be aiming to launch a secatarian war in the ME.

 

[AmirPatriot]

I think a strike against Iran is rational.

Which isn't saying much, since you've also said racism is rational.

I fully agree.

Which shows how ignorant you are. And believing a Wahhabi Saudi of anyone as well.

Lol keep dreaming.
US was at its closet point to war with Iran during the Bush administration, who was surrounded by ideologues/neoconservatives (they were itching badly). But even in those circumstances, rationality won the day rather than ideology. Thats because they realised the huge costs a war with Iran would bring, given Iran's assymetrical capabilites.

That was 2006/2007ish. What a war with Iran would look today is incomparable to what it would look like then, because Iran's capabilities and the geopolotical map have drastically changed.
The costs would be enormous, and with no guarantee the US would achieve any of its strategic objectives.
Its not gonna happen.

to all of it.

 

[TheCamelGuy]

Everything collapsed on August 2nd 1990 when Saddam used the army we helped building to stab us in the back. It was sudden, quick, and very unpredictable even by the most pessimistic person among us, and we were very unprepared for the war.

That was against Kuwaits regime, for some reason they were and still create problems whenever they can. Like when the faw grand port project was declared Kuwait came with a similar project a month in an attempt to sabotage it. He could've gone further south but he didn't. What is Kuwait's regime anyway, it's just another dictatorship protected by the US, their only value is the oil that lies there, same story with Qatar and the UAE(except they have a foreign workforce from the west whom grew the knowledge-based sector of the economy). Whilst we're at it let us make Basra and Al Ahsa a country too and have the residents swim in oil money whilst the rest is poor.

 

[Full Moon]

Which isn't saying much, since you've also said racism is rational.



Which shows how ignorant you are. And believing a Wahhabi Saudi of anyone as well.


to all of it.

I didn't say to you, and I have never said that "racism is rational". I have only said that "racism against Persians by Arabs is rational".

 

[haman10]

I think a strike against Iran is rational. There are many human rights grounds to launch it, but it should remain military targeted as opposed to being civilian targeted. Trump could also invest in the Kurdish side of Iran to riase nationalistic awarness there and raise the profile for autonomous Kurdish provinces in Iran.

Promise you sth my brother, if Iran is attacked by US, the main loser in that hell will be neither Iran nor US.
It will be Saudia.
you probably know why and it doesn't need explaining.

 

[Full Moon]

Promise you sth my brother, if Iran is attacked by US, the main loser in that hell will be neither Iran nor US.
It will be Saudia.
you probably know why and it doesn't need explaining.

You won't be able to do the slightest thing to KSA. You can't do anything in a real battle these days with 40 years old air-force. Your only hope of winning is through the blessing of Fatimah Al Masoumah's grave.

 

[haman10]

You won't be able to do the slightest thing to KSA. You can't do anything in a real battle these days with 40 years old air-force. Your only hope of winning is through the blessing of Fatimah Al Masoumah's grave.

Yeah sure. Whatever rocks your boat. Sleep tight tonight and feel completely safe

And BTW thats hz Fatima(A. S) the daughter of prophet mohammad (pbuh). Now i know you're a wahhabi, but going that low is sth I've never seen
Congratulations on that
@waz @Emmie

 

[Full Moon]

Yeah sure. Whatever rocks your boat. Sleep tight tonight and feel completely safe

And BTW thats hz Fatima(A. S) the daughter of prophet mohammad (pbuh). Now i know you're a wahhabi, but going that low is sth I've never seen
Congratulations on that
@waz @Emmie

You didn't get it. I meant the alleged grave of Fatimah Al Masoumah in Qum (which is allegedly believed to be the daughter of Mousa Al Kazim). How did a single grave of a lady that most Persians would call Tazi and malakh-khor became so holy (with millions Persian visitors per year)? I just don't get it.

 

[Mo12]

If USA goes to war with Iran, it can dream about going to war with China FOREVER.

USA will become poorer and weaker with a war with Iran and China will be getting stronger an stronger.

 

[Aramagedon]

You won't be able to do the slightest thing to KSA. You can't do anything in a real battle these days with 40 years old air-force. Your only hope of winning is through the blessing of Fatimah Al Masoumah's grave.

Saudi Nasibi watch your language. Your forefathers martyred household of prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as bani Israel martyred their prophets. We Shias are lovers and followers of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and his Household (PBUT), and we protect their shrines in Syria, Iraq, Iran and Madina from your barbarian terrorist kind. Inshallah when Imam Mahdi (PBUH) from Khurasan arrive, we will wipe you wahhabi nasibis of the earth and take the sweet revenge. There won't be any trump dog or jews to help you.

 

[Full Moon]

Saudi Nasibi watch your language. Your forefathers martyred household of prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as bani Israel martyred their prophets. We love Ahlulbayt and we protect their shrines in Syria, Iraq, Iran and Madina. Inshallah when Imam Mahdi (PBUH) arrive, we will wipe you wahhabi nasibis and take the sweet revenge...

Yes, when he arrives..

 

[Pakistani E]

Balochistan, Azerbejan, Al Ahwaz, and Turkmen areas in Iran (in addition to the Kurdish areas) should all be given at least autonomy. They have been unfairly ruled centrally by the Persians for a long time.

Leave out Balouchistan, Pakistan and Iran are on one page on Balouchistan. And let me say this, I cannot believe that one Muslim is cheering on someone like Trump to attack another Muslim country. No matter the issues between both of you countries, to ask for an outsider non Muslim country to attack a Muslim country is a very low move.

 

[Full Moon]

Leave out Balouchistan, Pakistan and Iran are on one page on Balouchistan. And let me say this, I cannot believe that one Muslim is cheering on someone like Trump to attack another Muslim country. No matter the issues between both of you countries, to ask for an outsider non Muslim country to attack a Muslim country is a very low move.

That is to take revenge for the 11 million Syrians who left their destroyed homes. Without such actions, the Mullahs lust for more destrction will not be stopped. Utopia has no place when the blood hits the fan.

 

[Timur]

and very unpredictable

no it was not unpredictable.. you guys played with the oil price (bad for saddam) and the US wanted them to attack.. saddam was a fool to fall in the trap and the games that where played there..

We Shias are lovers and followers of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)

I am just reading between the lines..

Your forefathers martyred household of prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as bani Israel martyred their prophets

you cannot give up the thought of blood and that raciest stuff dont you.. where where you iranians when that happened? worshipping idiols or fire?

Inshallah when Imam Mahdi (PBUH) from Khurasan arrive, we will wipe you wahhabi nasibis of the earth and take the sweet revenge

what revenge are you tallking about : the revange that arabs defeated persia?

when you guys are about all that religious and blood and racist things then tell me how the

Namaz Bibi Fatima Zara works?

is that not that you say this:

Yaa mawlaatee Yaa Faatimata Aghithnee.

O Master! O Fatimah! Come to my help!

than now read my signature.. and try to understand..



to the real topic he wont invade iran as US did not invade syria.. there are many ppl waiting for the remove of the mullahs in iran and live a western style life and this can be the trigger.. and than the armies from afghanistan can enter the scene and all will go into a whole other level