What's new

Will regard Pakistan as brother when in power, seek ties on mutual respect: Afghan Taliba

As long as Taliban did not control the North, India had an opening to be in Afghanistan through Iran. Now that door is going to get closed.

it does not work that way sir but good to See You are satisfied
 
.
f
then should Afghanistan not be that citadel of faith? Or You are like Iqbal and dont believe on man made boundaries between Moslems
The logic of cultural nationalism in Iqbal's case was based on the practical necessity of first acquiring a Muslim state, which would then make it possible for Indian Muslims to proceed with their experiment of building a society in accordance with the Shari'a. Should such a state be denied them, Indian Muslims would be bereft of the opportunity to introduce innovations which the Turks had taken upon themselves.
'Happily there is a solution in the enforcement of the Law of Islam in pakistan and its further development in the light of modern ideas. if this system of Law is properly understood and applied, at least the right to subsistence is secured to everybody. But the enforcement and development of the Shariat of Islam is impossible in this country without a free Muslim state or states, this is what Taliban fighting for with America and this is their demand on neogation on table to implement sharia law . On the other hand, Iqbal argued with Muslims about the need to renew Islamic culture. He used his poetry as an instrument to make Muslims realize that to become once again dynamic, enterprising and assertive, there was a need for reform of the traditional interpretation of Islam. He exhorted Muslims to wake up and learn to live with the changed times, considering reform to be effort to rekindle the dynamism of early Islam. I don't belive on any boundries. The is Balfour delcardation of boundries in 1925 and brought passport. put all nation in jail in their own countries and first time in human history put human free movement in earth a boundraies to secure wealths .
 
.
f
The logic of cultural nationalism in Iqbal's case was based on the practical necessity of first acquiring a Muslim state, which would then make it possible for Indian Muslims to proceed with their experiment of building a society in accordance with the Shari'a. Should such a state be denied them, Indian Muslims would be bereft of the opportunity to introduce innovations which the Turks had taken upon themselves.
'Happily there is a solution in the enforcement of the Law of Islam in pakistan and its further development in the light of modern ideas. if this system of Law is properly understood and applied, at least the right to subsistence is secured to everybody. But the enforcement and development of the Shariat of Islam is impossible in this country without a free Muslim state or states, this is what Taliban fighting for with America and this is their demand on neogation on table to implement sharia law . On the other hand, Iqbal argued with Muslims about the need to renew Islamic culture. He used his poetry as an instrument to make Muslims realize that to become once again dynamic, enterprising and assertive, there was a need for reform of the traditional interpretation of Islam. He exhorted Muslims to wake up and learn to live with the changed times, considering reform to be effort to rekindle the dynamism of early Islam. I don't belive on any boundries. The is Balfour delcardation of boundries in 1925 and brought passport. put all nation in jail in their own countries and first time in human history put human free movement in earth a boundraies to secure wealths .

i dont have the mental capacity to grasp Iqbal.

but i can assure you, if You have treated the refugees from Afghanistan, fair, Allah will give You the reward.

but if Allah judges You to be unfair in your treatment of orphans, women and the old, Whatever happens will be just and definite
 
. . .
Has this forum lost their damn minds? We are looking forward to a regime of terrorists? They will be the Hitlers of the East if given any power.
As for the Russians, if they have oppressed the Chechens, China has oppressed the Uyghurs. Russians are great allies to have, even better than America in some aspects. This entire affair is the pinnacle of diplomatic hypocrisy from all sodes of the table.
 
.
A brother in need is a brother indeed (bi directional)...

A great victory for Pak, a great loss for India and her side kick BD....
 
.
Of course Afghans would prefer to drown in s...it than improve all I care it wont be a launch pad for attacks we seen in the last two decades and we get acess to CAS thats whats matters

A win-win situation for most of the parties involved is a good thing.
 
. .
i dont have the mental capacity to grasp Iqbal.

but i can assure you, if You have treated the refugees from Afghanistan, fair, Allah will give You the reward.

but if Allah judges You to be unfair in your treatment of orphans, women and the old, Whatever happens will be just and definite
totally agreed with you.
 
. . .
@WebMaster @Horus kindly look at the language use by a TT in this thread, this emotionally and mentally unstable TT needs to be banned .

On Topic, We don't need another Birather Mumalik .
 
.
the british didnt wipe out the muslims at least. the russians did that when they took over crimea, an area ruled and settled by muslims, and everywhere north of that. they committed genocide and forced them to leave their homes and settle in ottoman empire.

no one is saying that the west is full of angels, it is just that they are the lesser evil.

African Slave trade was a wholly Western affair, was it not?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom