To all my CHinese posters who point out India was never unified, well that is completely wrong. Please tell your state written textbooks to correct such garbage. ASHOKA ruled a unified India bigger than CHina. Got that? Now shut up about such BS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i would say ,you have made some mistakes here.Sorry forgot about this post, am aware of how India became a country
But there was no country call China until the creation of Republic of China in 1912 and although Tibet was rules as an autonomous country during the reign of Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties on and off , it had got its Independence with the collapse of Qing dynasty.
Therefore, in theory Tibet does not belong to China .
China also tried to claim Mongolia which got its freedom after the fall of Qing dynasty until Soviet told them get lost.
our history book didn't tell us much about india,especially negative information.To all my CHinese posters who point out India was never unified, well that is completely wrong. Please tell your state written textbooks to correct such garbage. ASHOKA ruled a unified India bigger than CHina. Got that? Now shut up about such BS
i would say ,you have made some mistakes here.
the word 中国 is widely used from about 3000 years ago,though its territory is not as big as now .
tibet maybe was in a power vacuum of ROC govt for several years. but when you review the history of ROC(1912-1949),it even didn't control 50% of the whole country before 1945.
KMT govt agreed the independence of Mongolia but no govt agree a tibet country.north Ireland is not independent now ,right?btw, some territories we lost are back now ,HK,macau...
our history book didn't tell us much about india,especially negative information.
but we can get many from internet,especially from the west.....
Yet you are quick to embrace Western information even though how one sided such info can be!
Good, being of Indian ancestry, you agree that Britain created India after conquered the small kingdoms and medium size "empires" such as Maratha, Sihk or Mysore empires. If its not for the British, India would be in many small pieces.
Though you agree with me about Indian history. But I am afraid you know too little about Chinese history to comment about it in this forum.
wow....did forget we have firewall?
we should have NO FREEDOM to embrace western information in your mind.
i would say ,you have made some mistakes here.
the word 中国 is widely used from about 3000 years ago,though its territory is not as big as now .
tibet maybe was in a power vacuum of ROC govt for several years. but when you review the history of ROC(1912-1949),it even didn't control 50% of the whole country before 1945.
KMT govt agreed the independence of Mongolia but no govt agree a tibet country.north Ireland is not independent now ,right?btw, some territories we lost are back now ,HK,macau...
New Recruit
India badly wants to stop China's rise but China is too powerful and in a war would hit New Delhi with airstrikes from Tibet airbases.
India badly wants to stop China's rise but China is too powerful and in a war would hit New Delhi with airstrikes from Tibet airbases.
Unlike some neighboring country India has never been an US's ally. India has one of the worst voting records against the USA in the UNO. India has never joined any power group and has maintained to be non-aligned...India does have a good relation with Russia and also with America but in their own terms...America does not dictate India's foreign policy. Iran would be a great example..India still buys Iranian oil and has not imposed any sanctions. This question should be asked to countries who claims to be China's all weather friend and also lives in the mercy of the United States' funds...and are willing to shift or change friends for money.
Happy trolling
It seems any word against your country is trolling and everything else is not..... What I have written is a fact...whether you like it or not.