Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I totally agree, though things are looking up, states are taking up the economic mantles on their own. States have started competing against each other, which is a good sign. There's much more internal integration now then before.
Actualy Manmohan got most of the credit for 1991 reform and Rao contribution was ignored. Rao move for economic liberalization was politically risky move. He was our deng xiaoping and like Deng got completely sidelined . I am personally very disappointed in Manmohan he being an economist RBI ex governor allowed current account deficit to go more than 6% which lead to our currency crisis in 2013. You cannot expect much from him in political front but allowing CAD to overshoot to such an extent was not expected from him.Rao indeed was critical. But one man that is not given enough credit is Mr. Singh. Mr. Singh was 'silent' and not as 'vocal' as Modi, but by Jove, the man was a policy genius. Tactical and shrewd, by all means.
Its important not to compare to China in terms of policy implementation. The CPC has a tendency of policy reforms that may provide short term gains, but result in long term effects, an example has been their environmental exigency. A result of Mao-era environmental engineering.
Again, one thing that the Indian government can learn from the Chinese are more so operational policy initiatives in context to manufacturing processes. India's industry has not reached potential , and focus is on light service sector, heavy industry has yet to be tapped. Hard industry such as manufacturing is what will produce hundreds of thousands of jobs that will transform Indian civil society on the grassroots level to the national polity level. It may even have an effect on urbanization levels as well as greater infrastructure development to meet urbanization rate.
Percentage wise we will be the fastest
Actualy Manmohan got most of the credit for 1991 reform and Rao contribution was ignored. Rao move for economic liberalization was politically risky move. He was our deng xiaoping and like Deng got completely sidelined . I am personally very disappointed in Manmohan he being an economist RBI ex governor allowed current account deficit to go more than 6% which lead to our currency crisis in 2013. You cannot expect much from him in political front but allowing CAD to overshoot to such an extent was not expected from him.
Manmohan became victim of the Gandhi dynasty, doesn't take away the fact that he was a brilliant economist. There was global economic turmoil during his prime ministership too.
Naturally , bro. India is a continental sized nation ! India, to me, still remains largely untapped !!
A brilliant economist who allowed such massive current account deficit to occur, if he couldn't even control CAD due to political pressure why the hell didn't he resign from his job ?History would have judged him far more kindly.Manmohan became victim of the Gandhi dynasty, doesn't take away the fact that he was a brilliant economist. There was global economic turmoil during his prime ministership too.
Yes, because Bollywood is making a movie on the 'Shupa Powa' rising in every way
so it has to be true !
It's temporary.
There is uneven distribution of goods and services in India so GDP increase in a country like India dont help much to reduce poverty as it don't necessarily guarantee an equitable distribution of incomes
The number of hungry people in India has fallen to by 9.5 per cent to 190.7 million now from 210.8 million two decades ago
It's temporary.