WILL CHINA'S AIRCRAFT CARRIER VARYAG BE AT SEA BEFORE INDIA'S INS VIKRAMADITYA?

[milvipes]

Like he would have the balls for that.

And you wonder why I left WASPland for Mexico.

 

[ZhengHe]

China have the courage to do that? Remember, it was Soviets and Chinese weapons that was defeated by US.

no courage necessary, as demonstrated by the US

 

[CardSharp]

And you wonder why I left WASPland for Mexico.

I like Canada. Canadians are on a whole very nice people +/- a couple of bigots.

btw did you catch any flak as a Chinese person after Zhenli Ye Gon was caught?

coopelas ó cuello!

 

[gambit]

no courage necessary, as demonstrated by the US

Kid, everything require courage, even if it is just taking candy from a baby. The PLA does not have 1/10th the combat experience the US military has, does not have the reach, does not have the combined arms training, in short, the Chinese military does not have the institutional knowledge the US military has. If it comes to a shooting war, a single aircraft carrier will do serious surprise and damages to the PLAN.

 

[IndianArmy]

Kid, everything require courage, even if it is just taking candy from a baby. The PLA does not have 1/10th the combat experience the US military has, does not have the reach, does not have the combined arms training, in short, the Chinese military does not have the institutional knowledge the US military has. If it comes to a shooting war, a single aircraft carrier will do serious surprise and damages to the PLAN.

I am Sorry for Sneaking In, But I seriously dont Consider your Views about there Military and Combat Experience legitimate , They Might be to a moderate degree less Combat proven than the United States for they are not Imperial powers and Fighting to overcome Insecurities of Both theirs and few Other nations...

Under estimating china has not proved good for any nation

 

[duhastmish]

Kid, everything require courage, even if it is just taking candy from a baby. The PLA does not have 1/10th the combat experience the US military has, does not have the reach, does not have the combined arms training, in short, the Chinese military does not have the institutional knowledge the US military has. If it comes to a shooting war, a single aircraft carrier will do serious surprise and damages to the PLAN.

PLAN is weakest force in Chinese defense.

but surely noway - we can under estimate the Chinese. A non democratic state can always surprise us all with its defence.

United states is surely way too much powerful for china. but it will be insane to consider that Chinese deterrence can be taken care united states.

in case of war - china just need to defend itself since they cant really attack and destroy united states.

 

[milvipes]

I like Canada. Canadians are on a whole very nice people +/- a couple of bigots.

btw did you catch any flak as a Chinese person after Zhenli Ye Gon was caught?

coopelas ó cuello!

Didn't feel it.

 

[siegecrossbow]

post deleted

 

[ao333]

Kid, everything require courage, even if it is just taking candy from a baby. The PLA does not have 1/10th the combat experience the US military has, does not have the reach, does not have the combined arms training, in short, the Chinese military does not have the institutional knowledge the US military has. If it comes to a shooting war, a single aircraft carrier will do serious surprise and damages to the PLAN.

Hey buddy, that mentality was what led to the result of the Vietnam War; pun intended.

 

[cross1993]

Maybe only need the money. Let China and USA increase in military spending.
China maintains 2% GDP spent to military.
USA maintains 8% GDP spent to military.
China to spend money at home.
USA to spend money in the world.

 

[gambit]

Maybe only need the money. Let China and USA increase in military spending.
China maintains 2% GDP spent to military.
USA maintains 8% GDP spent to military.
China to spend money at home.
USA to spend money in the world.

Source for that?

 

[CardSharp]

Source for that?

I think he means let China spend 2% and the US 8%, China will keep its money at home for education,welfare, health etc and the US can keep spending its money fighting global wars. I doubt he is saying that China spends 2 and the US 8%.

 

[zombieland]

Isn't India building two more ACs apart from that Russian one ... m not sure though ... and from what i read INS Viraat would still be chugging along for another 10 yrs !!!!

 

[gambit]

I think he means let China spend 2% and the US 8%, China will keep its money at home for education,welfare, health etc and the US can keep spending its money fighting global wars. I doubt he is saying that China spends 2 and the US 8%.

Why are you tap-dancing for the guy?

 

[cross1993]

Source for that?

My memory is wrong.
I am sorry. USA is 5% GDP spent to military, not 8%.
USSR is Average 8% GDP spent to military.


But I think the USA will soon be 8%.
Now, the USA is prepared to reopen F22 production line?