Why the Tejas-1A will be a lethal option for the IAF

[knight11]

What about it? Russian media and Western media quoting Russian media, with some Taiwanese media in between talking about how china needs it.

Not only by Russian and Taiwanese media but by Western Media also

If any of the submarines, fighter rumors had been true, we be flying the Su-35 already.

So you are saying China is never interested in Su-35, nor it haven't discuss with the Russians on this regards.

Why do you think China declined T-50 joint development.

When was it offered to China.
Does S-400 is also cleared/offered for China
Does all IPR issue related to Su27--- J16/J11 have been just Rumor.
DO you deny that China have bought blue prints and IPR and 6 Ukraine KH-55 illegaly with Koshun powerplant, which was latter copied in YJ-10.

 

[Akasa]

China's Lethal J-20 vs. Taiwan's F-16: Who Wins? | The National Interest

The J-20’s suite of sensors probably include a new nose-mounted active electronically scanned array AESA radar—currently thought to be under development—and an infra-red search and track (IRST) system, which would allow it to passively track and shoot down aircraft enemy planes.

Writer is Japanese.

The prototype of the J-20's AESA radar was completed by 2009, at which time it had 1856 T/R modules, but it's possible that a newer variant is being built.

 

[Zarvan]

I repeat Not even single Aesa has operationally deployed in Fighters Except on forums

J-15 and J-16 and J-10 C are operational and using AESA radar your denial only shows Indian mindset who hardly accept anything and remain in denial all the times

 

[Vyom]

J-15 and J-16 and J-10 C are operational and using AESA radar your denial only shows Indian mindset who hardly accept anything and remain in denial all the times

Quote Source. You can also repeat that they are ruining on cold fusion reactors. Doesn't mean its true.

 

[NKVD]

J-15 and J-16 and J-10 C are operational and using AESA radar your denial only shows Indian mindset who hardly accept anything and remain in denial all the times

Yeah only on forum's. There is no source or research papers available Except some Photoshop pics in public through sino Defence

Even Russians have highlighted there AESA in MAKS but Chinese made it like ,its a ground shaking tech

 

[GURU DUTT]

Quote Source. You can also repeat that they are ruining on cold fusion reactors. Doesn't mean its true.

hub bul watan pakistanies are so frutated by indian growth and indian obsession for making up for all the lost time in R&D of all dual use techs that pakistanies knowing they can never come to level of india want to caress there bruised ego by acting as cheerleaders for chinese... man thats hight of frustation and hate towards india

 

[Zarvan]

Yeah only on forum's. There is no source or research papers available Except some Photoshop pics in public through sino Defence

Even Russians have highlighted there AESA in MAKS but Chinese made it like something its a ground shaking tech

They are flying with AESA radars and are in mass production and few squadrons deployed your denial like a 4 year old kid won't change it.

 

[Vyom]

hub bul watan pakistanies are so frutated by indian growth and indian obsession for making up for all the lost time in R&D of all dual use techs that pakistanies knowing they can never come to level of india want to caress there bruised ego by acting as cheerleaders for chinese... man thats hight of frustation and hate towards india

There are only 3 Asea radars deployed in fighter nose cones, Rayethon APG series,Thales Aesa and Mitsubishi's APG 2 Aesa. The Israeli Radar that we are getting is essentially Rayethon being sold through Israel. what to say.

West will always have an advantage over others as they have established evolutionary R&D, and will better themselves with each passing day. Even russia is behind the US by two decades in terms of technology, and again in case of money it is far from having the capacity to invest *heavily in R&D* sad but bitter truth.

 

[GURU DUTT]

There are only 3 Asea radars deployed in fighter nose cones, Rayethon APG series,Thales Aesa and Mitsubishi's APG 2 Aesa. The Israeli Radar that we are getting is essentially Rayethon being sold through Israel. what to say.

West will always have an advantage over others as they have established evolutionary R&D, and will better themselves with each passing day. Even russia is behind the US by two decades in terms of technology, and again in case of money it is far from having the capacity to invest *heavily in R&D* sad but bitter truth.

we should buy all wepons and radars that israelies can sell to us and keep doing owr R&D and try to tieup with them to bridge the technological gap even if USA is selling us its wepons whts wrong in it what we need is the best leathel tech and USA has it and ready to sell us i guess we should shed off the past baggage and sart for a new relationship as USA needs us more than we need them and make most of it till we can

 

[nadeemkhan110]

But the problem with India’s HAL Tejas is that it is one of the single worst fighter projects that has ever been conceived of in the history of aviation. Even as it enters service, the aircraft is obsolete and is probably inferior in many respects to the JF-17. The jet has 57 known deficiencies and will probably get a lot of Indian pilots killed if any type of conflict were ever to break out.
A 'Crash Landing': The Slow and Painful Death of India's Air Force | The National Interest Blog

 

[Indian Patriot]

ballistic protection is provided by titanium and carbon composite materials, EW suite is already in tajes.(externally mounted) mid air refueling will be added before introduction, tajes can fire BVR missiles, tajes is single engine jet, all single engine jets have small combat radius and carry less payload. tajes is an air defense jet. not a deep penetration strike jet to have a longer range and payload.

Your post is full of factual errors.

EW suite does not exist in LCA.

Mid air refueling does not exist

LCA cannot fire BVR missiles

F-16 has a better range and payload than LCA.

F-16 is a single engine fighter but it can perform air defense and nuclear strike

F-16 cockpit is more resilient against 7.62 mm rounds

False flagger Muslim , please rename your ID to Ummah patriot.

Typical sanghi response. And keep off religion you little prick.

 

[Vyom]

we should buy all wepons and radars that israelies can sell to us and keep doing owr R&D and try to tieup with them to bridge the technological gap even if USA is selling us its wepons whts wrong in it what we need is the best leathel tech and USA has it and ready to sell us i guess we should shed off the past baggage and sart for a new relationship as USA needs us more than we need them and make most of it till we can

It not about dependability but about converging interests. USA will not like to see India as a challenger but Historically India has never been a threat to USA. 1971 Bay of Bengal deployment was because of Nixon and Nixon Only not of the US establishment.

USA irrespective of the "President" establishment is a natural ally and PRC is a natural Rival. reason is only two countries have been Democracies from the day they were born as modern Nation States. USA knows it cant hold on to power forever but it will be significant player to have the veto calls in all Global influential organizations, and having India by it sides not as a challenger but at a nation with convergent interests will always be in its benefit.

In words of PKS :
"If India was not the first choice, then why did the US & UK urgently respond to India's pleas for help after 1962? Why did the US allow all the DAE's scientists & engineers to be educated & trained in nuclear physics & nuclear power generation technologies/methods since the 1950s? Why did the US, UK & France not oppose or prevent India's procurement of the 40mW CIRUS PHWR from Canada in the late 1960s? Why did the US decide to teach ADA's rookie solitaire-playing techies both the science & art of developing fly-by-wire flight control systems for the LCA since the late 1980s? Why did it make an official offer to sell the F/A-18A/B Hornet to the Indian Navy way back in 1986? Why did the US allow Indian Navy's techies from WESEE entry into Silicon Valley & learn all about warship-mounted sonars so that they could come back & join the NPOL to develop the APSOH family of sonars? During the entire Cold War era, did even a single techie from either the DRDO or India's armed forces ever secure any kind of entry of this kind into any military R & D establishment of the USSR?"

 

[Indian Patriot]

It's more futuristic than trolls here thinks.

So futuristic that it cannot refuel in mid-air, cannot fire BVR missiles and it has no EW suite.

 

[Vyom]

Going by your posts, you cannot make any nuanced reply and you are just here for the rants. so let me here waste my time and energy in trying to send some sense to the dried turd that functions as the grey matter in your skull.

Your post is full of factual errors.

Your post is full of egotistical errors, which is blind as such it doesn't even seem to know how to use Google.

EW suite does not exist in LCA.

Tejas doesn't have Internally mounted EW suite, Barring Western Planes, no fighters have an internal EW suite. But it has received an external EW suit.

India’s Tejas aircraft receives advanced electronic warfare suite - Airforce Technology

Mid air refueling does not exist

Because Mk1 wasn't supposed to have one ? Have you even read operational requirements of LCA programme. It was decided to have Cobham probe installed in the later version after IOC was achived.

LCA cannot fire BVR missiles

It can Derby and Python BVR missiles.

F-16 has a better range and payload than LCA.

F-16 is a single engine fighter but it can perform air defense and nuclear strike

F-16 cockpit is more resilient against 7.62 mm rounds

F-16 comparison really ? Are the operational requirements of LCA and F-16 are the same? where did that dawn upon yo? seer genius !!

F-16 has produced more than 4500+ aircrafts since 1973, the block 50s have F110-GE-100 engines, they have made 50 block changes and comparing that to a first block of a aircraft is absolute genius. LCA is not a dog Fighting aircraft, it not supposed to carry a Nuclear warhead. and its a point defense aircraft, where did you get the Idea it cannot perform air defense any reasonable citation or have you flown one ?

7.62 mm rounds ? Who fires an AK 47 at a fighter aircraft ? this Genius is simply mind boggling... *salutes & shoots self*

P.S. Change the flag mate... its getting too obvious now.

 

[Indian Patriot]

Hence proved you are a Masada educated bigot , who will live in freedom of a democracy and still rant about majority populace and try to derail every progress made by nation , each and everyone of you traitors should be lined up in front of a firing squad.

Who cares what a sanghi thinks? You losers don't have proper dressing sense and you want to run the country?

Tell me one think munna. Do you even have he guts to stand in front of a Muslim colony in India and tell them to leave or does the thought make you piss in your pants? I have sen cowards like you. They will talk tough on the internet and in real life they are the most meek and docile types.

This thread is about Tejas and not your cowardice. If you want PDF to know how big a coward you are then start a thread in Members forum and don't troll here.

Tejas doesn't have Internally mounted EW suite, Barring Western Planes, no fighters have an internal EW suite. But it has received an external EW suit.

India’s Tejas aircraft receives advanced electronic warfare suite - Airforce Technology

The EW suite on board LCA is a joke and IAF is looking to procure one from abroad.

Tejas lacks the teeth IAF needs - The Times of India

Because Mk1 wasn't supposed to have one ?

Then how can you call LCA a 4th gen aircraft? Did the operational requirements put by IAF mention that the air force would be happy with a 32 year delay on Tejas?

It can Derby and Python BVR missiles.

It CANNOT fire BVR missiles. Your constant lies won't change the truth.

F-16 comparison really ? Are the operational requirements of LCA and F-16 are the same? where did that dawn upon yo? seer genius !!

Were the operational requirements of ALL single-engine fighter the same when you so stupidly remarked that Tajas being a single engine fighter has the same range and payload like any other single engine fighter.

F-35 is a single engine fighter. If I compare LCA and F-35 then you will start crying.

*satutes & shoots self*

Please do that ASAP. India already has a lot of idiots, I don't want my country to suffer more.

P.S. Change the flag mate... its getting too obvious now.

Change your mindset you rabid sanghi. India has no place for bigots like you now.